Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

About key concepts of safety at work in production

View through CrossRef
he article consistently reveals the differences and similarities between concepts such as “ safety at work” and “occupational safety and health”, as well as between personal living and materialized work, between private and hired labor, between the risks of exposure to danger to the worker’s body and the occupational risk of disability. The discussion is based on a detailed analysis of the “simple process of work”, during which, under the influence of “tools,” the “subject of work” turns into a “product of work”. This extremely general approach makes it possible to identify the duality of work, which both acts as a material process and as a socio-economic attitude of the “organizer of production” and the “hired worker.” This approach has been shown to be heuristically fruitful. It allows us to solve one of the cardinal issues of the modern economy and occupational safety and health - to identify a clear criterion for dividing the legality of “labor relations” under an employment contract and “legal relations regarding labor” formalized by civil law contracts. This criterion is the “ownership” of the product of work, and the real transition of the “worker” created by personal living work to the “product of work” at the disposal of either the “hired worker” himself (private labor) or the «organizer of production» (hired labor). It is shown how, depending on the essence of labor (private or hired labor), the organization of protection against dangers and the risk of harm by its effect on the body of the worker changes. In one case, it acts as “safety at work”, and in another - as “occupational safety and health”. The duality of occupational safety and health and its concepts arising from the duality of hired labor, illustrated by examples of Russian-speaking Russian and English-speaking international discourses, is considered. Particular attention is paid to the differences in the material risk of the impact of danger on the body of the worker and the socio-economic “occupational risk” of the loss of their ability to work by hired workers.
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Title: About key concepts of safety at work in production
Description:
he article consistently reveals the differences and similarities between concepts such as “ safety at work” and “occupational safety and health”, as well as between personal living and materialized work, between private and hired labor, between the risks of exposure to danger to the worker’s body and the occupational risk of disability.
The discussion is based on a detailed analysis of the “simple process of work”, during which, under the influence of “tools,” the “subject of work” turns into a “product of work”.
This extremely general approach makes it possible to identify the duality of work, which both acts as a material process and as a socio-economic attitude of the “organizer of production” and the “hired worker.
” This approach has been shown to be heuristically fruitful.
It allows us to solve one of the cardinal issues of the modern economy and occupational safety and health - to identify a clear criterion for dividing the legality of “labor relations” under an employment contract and “legal relations regarding labor” formalized by civil law contracts.
This criterion is the “ownership” of the product of work, and the real transition of the “worker” created by personal living work to the “product of work” at the disposal of either the “hired worker” himself (private labor) or the «organizer of production» (hired labor).
It is shown how, depending on the essence of labor (private or hired labor), the organization of protection against dangers and the risk of harm by its effect on the body of the worker changes.
In one case, it acts as “safety at work”, and in another - as “occupational safety and health”.
The duality of occupational safety and health and its concepts arising from the duality of hired labor, illustrated by examples of Russian-speaking Russian and English-speaking international discourses, is considered.
Particular attention is paid to the differences in the material risk of the impact of danger on the body of the worker and the socio-economic “occupational risk” of the loss of their ability to work by hired workers.

Related Results

Evaluating Effects of Culture and Language on Safety
Evaluating Effects of Culture and Language on Safety
This paper (SPE 54448) was revised for publication from paper SPE 48891, prepared for the 1998 SPE International Conference and Exhibition held in Beijing, 2–6 November. Original m...
Factors Influencing Patient Safety Management Behaviors in Nursing Students
Factors Influencing Patient Safety Management Behaviors in Nursing Students
The objective of this study is to identify the critical thinking Disposition, problem-solving processes, safety motivation, patient safety management knowledge, attitudes towards p...
Impact of Construction Safety Culture and Construction Safety Climate on Safety Behavior and Safety Motivation
Impact of Construction Safety Culture and Construction Safety Climate on Safety Behavior and Safety Motivation
The construction industry is known for its disappointing safety performance. Therefore, rethinking current safety management frameworks is crucial. This study assesses a newly prop...
Host rock-specific preliminary safety concepts for the representative preliminary safety assessments
Host rock-specific preliminary safety concepts for the representative preliminary safety assessments
The Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal (BGE) is responsible for identifying the site with the best-possible safety for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste for ...
Production Surveillance And Optimization With Data Driven Models
Production Surveillance And Optimization With Data Driven Models
Abstract In conventional practice, individual well oil, gas and water production is only measured on a weekly or monthly basis using shared well test facilities. ...
Pursuit of “Absolute Battery Safety, Fear-Free Energy and Mobility” - A Technology Roadmap Toward a Fail-Never Battery Future
Pursuit of “Absolute Battery Safety, Fear-Free Energy and Mobility” - A Technology Roadmap Toward a Fail-Never Battery Future
The Pursuit of “Absolute Battery Safety, Fear-Free Energy, and Mobility”—A ”Technology Roadmap Toward a Fail-Never Battery Future As the electrification of transportation and energ...
An analysis of safety advisor roles and site safety performance
An analysis of safety advisor roles and site safety performance
Purpose – Present findings from a UK study, funded by the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH), on the relationship between safety advisor roles and...

Back to Top