Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Exploring cross-cultural narratives in literary studies: tradition, subjectivity, and strategy: an interview with Xiuyan Fu and Marco Caracciolo
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This interview article explores the dynamic intersections of cross-cultural narratology, focusing on three key dimensions: narrative tradition, narrative subjectivity, and narrative strategy. Through a conversation with two distinguished scholars – Professor Xiuyan Fu and Professor Marco Caracciolo – this discussion bridges Eastern and Western literary narrative traditions, delving into how cultural contexts shape narrative theories, how non-human entities contribute to the construction of narrative subjectivity, and how the concept of slow narrative functions as a narrative strategy in shaping modern literary narrative theory. The selection of these two interviewees is of considerable academic importance. Professor Xiuyan Fu is a leading figure in the field of Chinese narratology, renowned for his in-depth research on the narrative structures of traditional Chinese literature and their contemporary significance. His work not only provides an essential perspective on how cultural traditions shape narrative forms but also highlights the unique contributions of Chinese narratology within global narrative studies. Professor Marco Caracciolo is one of the foremost scholars in cognitive narratology and materiality studies in the West. His research has had a significant impact on narrative experience, embodied cognition, and environmental storytelling. He particularly examines how narrative engages readers’ embodied experiences and how non-human perspectives challenge anthropocentric narratives in the Anthropocene. His work not only expands the boundaries of narratology but also advances academic discussions in posthumanism and ecocriticism, offering new theoretical frameworks for narrative studies in contemporary interdisciplinary literature. By engaging in this dialogue, the interview aims to provide fresh insights into the future development of literary theory, particularly at the intersection of ecocriticism, narratology, and the digital humanities. The perspectives of these two scholars will contribute to these evolving academic fields while offering valuable guidance and reflections for emerging scholars.
Title: Exploring cross-cultural narratives in literary studies: tradition, subjectivity, and strategy: an interview with Xiuyan Fu and Marco Caracciolo
Description:
Abstract
This interview article explores the dynamic intersections of cross-cultural narratology, focusing on three key dimensions: narrative tradition, narrative subjectivity, and narrative strategy.
Through a conversation with two distinguished scholars – Professor Xiuyan Fu and Professor Marco Caracciolo – this discussion bridges Eastern and Western literary narrative traditions, delving into how cultural contexts shape narrative theories, how non-human entities contribute to the construction of narrative subjectivity, and how the concept of slow narrative functions as a narrative strategy in shaping modern literary narrative theory.
The selection of these two interviewees is of considerable academic importance.
Professor Xiuyan Fu is a leading figure in the field of Chinese narratology, renowned for his in-depth research on the narrative structures of traditional Chinese literature and their contemporary significance.
His work not only provides an essential perspective on how cultural traditions shape narrative forms but also highlights the unique contributions of Chinese narratology within global narrative studies.
Professor Marco Caracciolo is one of the foremost scholars in cognitive narratology and materiality studies in the West.
His research has had a significant impact on narrative experience, embodied cognition, and environmental storytelling.
He particularly examines how narrative engages readers’ embodied experiences and how non-human perspectives challenge anthropocentric narratives in the Anthropocene.
His work not only expands the boundaries of narratology but also advances academic discussions in posthumanism and ecocriticism, offering new theoretical frameworks for narrative studies in contemporary interdisciplinary literature.
By engaging in this dialogue, the interview aims to provide fresh insights into the future development of literary theory, particularly at the intersection of ecocriticism, narratology, and the digital humanities.
The perspectives of these two scholars will contribute to these evolving academic fields while offering valuable guidance and reflections for emerging scholars.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Anthropocene, literature, and econarratology: An interview with Marco Caracciolo
Anthropocene, literature, and econarratology: An interview with Marco Caracciolo
Abstract
Marco Caracciolo is Associate Professor of English and Literary Theory at Ghent University in Belgium, where he led the ERC Starting Grant project “Narratin...
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
It was always based on a teenage love story between the two kids. One is a sniffer and one is not. It was designed for Central Australia because we do write these kids off there. N...
Phenomenological approach to human subjectivity in tourism sciences
Phenomenological approach to human subjectivity in tourism sciences
Through a phenomenological approach to human subjectivity, this study seeks to explain the philosophical ideology of phenomenology that is lacking in its methodology. Ideology and ...
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Since his death in 1922, Henry Lawson’s “spirit” has been kept alive by admirers across Australia. Over the last century, Lawson’s reputation in the academy has fluctuated yet fan ...
THE WAY TO LATGALIAN LITERATURE DURING THE 90s OF THE 20TH CENTURY
THE WAY TO LATGALIAN LITERATURE DURING THE 90s OF THE 20TH CENTURY
During the 90s of the 20th century revival of Latgalian literature took place in the Republic of Latvia. It was a gradual process; in 2001 in “History of Latvian Literature" create...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
IntroductionThe American artist Ryan Trecartin makes digital videos that centre on the self-presentations common to video-sharing sites such as YouTube. Named by New Yorker critic ...

