Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Semiological Guerrilla Warfare 2.0: Claudio Paolucci’s Version

View through CrossRef
The article reconstructs the concept of pre-truth and semiological guerrilla warfare 2.0, as presented within the frame work of the European research project Fakespotting by one of the last disciples of U. Eco, the Italian semiotician and professor at the University of Bologna, C. Paolucci. Drawing on the theoretical foundations laid by M. Foucault and B. Latour, Paolucci argues that social representations of truth and falsehood should be understood as derivatives of the relationship between knowledge and power, which, in turn, are contingent upon communication technologies actively engaged in the reconfiguration of the network of social actors. The contemporary technological revolution in the sphere of communications has engendered a new iteration of semiological guerrilla warfare 2.0, which diverges significantly from the model proposed by U. Eco in the latter half of the 1960s. This revised framework posits that the generation of messages that serve as alternatives to the dominant informational mainstream is no longer confined to the output stage of the communicative chain; rather, it is localized at the point of entry, as consumers increasingly assume the role of content producers. Digital communication, predicated upon the algorithmic production of documents, has fostered conditions conducive to the resurgence of the medieval conception of truth as trust – a paradigm rooted in personal experience and manifested in the form of anecdotal facts disseminated by online users. The semiotic structure of such anecdotal facts privileges experience over knowledge. Consequently, it is more precise to refer not to post truth but to pre-truth, wherein the articulation of truth becomes the digital counterpart of the medieval notion of “doing truth” (“facere veritatem”).
Title: Semiological Guerrilla Warfare 2.0: Claudio Paolucci’s Version
Description:
The article reconstructs the concept of pre-truth and semiological guerrilla warfare 2.
0, as presented within the frame work of the European research project Fakespotting by one of the last disciples of U.
Eco, the Italian semiotician and professor at the University of Bologna, C.
Paolucci.
Drawing on the theoretical foundations laid by M.
Foucault and B.
Latour, Paolucci argues that social representations of truth and falsehood should be understood as derivatives of the relationship between knowledge and power, which, in turn, are contingent upon communication technologies actively engaged in the reconfiguration of the network of social actors.
The contemporary technological revolution in the sphere of communications has engendered a new iteration of semiological guerrilla warfare 2.
0, which diverges significantly from the model proposed by U.
Eco in the latter half of the 1960s.
This revised framework posits that the generation of messages that serve as alternatives to the dominant informational mainstream is no longer confined to the output stage of the communicative chain; rather, it is localized at the point of entry, as consumers increasingly assume the role of content producers.
Digital communication, predicated upon the algorithmic production of documents, has fostered conditions conducive to the resurgence of the medieval conception of truth as trust – a paradigm rooted in personal experience and manifested in the form of anecdotal facts disseminated by online users.
The semiotic structure of such anecdotal facts privileges experience over knowledge.
Consequently, it is more precise to refer not to post truth but to pre-truth, wherein the articulation of truth becomes the digital counterpart of the medieval notion of “doing truth” (“facere veritatem”).

Related Results

General characterization of ideological semiology based on Roland Barthes’ semiological theory
General characterization of ideological semiology based on Roland Barthes’ semiological theory
This article presents a semiological analysis of ideology on the basis of R. Barthes’ semiological theory. The subject of the study is ideology as a semiological system. R. Barthes...
Kwame Nkrumah’s Though on Guerrilla Warfare and Revolution
Kwame Nkrumah’s Though on Guerrilla Warfare and Revolution
The Handbook of Revolutionary Warfare (1966) was written by Pan-Africanist, revolutionary, theorizer of the global south, first leader of independent Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah (1909-197...
Ideology as a Sign System: Semiological Analysis
Ideology as a Sign System: Semiological Analysis
Introduction. This article substantiates the possibility of semiological analysis in relation to ideology on the basis of the semiological theory of R. Barthes. The subject of the ...
Hybrid Warfare
Hybrid Warfare
Hybrid warfare has been the bandwagon term to describe modern warfare in academic, policy, and journalist accounts. It describes a wide array of warfare techniques that do not corr...
Tracing the Genesis of Hybrid Warfare
Tracing the Genesis of Hybrid Warfare
The literature on hybrid warfare is relatively new as the term was only coined in 2006 and the subject remains open for new findings and research. The combination of tactics used i...
The Role of the Vision Quest in Teton Sioux Warfare
The Role of the Vision Quest in Teton Sioux Warfare
The vision quest was closely related to Teton Sioux Warfare. The vision quest was a religious act whereby the Indian fasted from two to seven days and, if successful, received a su...
Is the arbitrary symmetrical?
Is the arbitrary symmetrical?
AbstractArbitrariness is commonly seen as a major concept in Saussure’s thought, and it even receives the status of a “principle” in his theory. It is not only the characteristic f...
Review Essays
Review Essays
Book reviewed in this article:HOMOSEXUALITY, QUEER THEORY, AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY: THE LESBIAN AND GAY STUDIES READER Edited by Henry Abe love, Michèle Aina Barale, and David M. Ha...

Back to Top