Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cooperative gender beliefs and cost-benefit trade-offs of gender inequality
View through CrossRef
<p>Cooperative gender beliefs are characterizations of women, men and heterosexual relationships that focus on positive aspects of traditional traits and roles, and heterosexual interdependency, but ultimately rationalize gender inequality. Approaches to cooperative gender beliefs vary by discipline, resulting in different theories and terminology. Terms such as benevolent sexism, gender-specific-meritocracy, and traditional gender beliefs refer to similar clusters of beliefs that are associated with gender inequalities. By specifying the different types, functions, and levels of cooperative gender beliefs, this thesis provides a systematic study that investigates why people would adopt beliefs that perpetuate harmful gender inequalities. This line of study tests evidence for the perspective that cooperative gender beliefs manage trade-offs between the costs and the benefits of living in societies with unequal gender relations. I conceptualize different types of gender beliefs as cooperative, and investigate the extent to which they are linked with trade-offs involved in inequality at the individual level, such as doing unfair amounts of housework, and the societal level, such as being relatively less impacted by gender inequalities. I present three empirical studies. Study 1 explores different types of cooperative gender beliefs and how they are linked to gendered divisions of labour. Study 2 investigates evidence for an evolutionarily informed theory that cooperative gender beliefs function to increase reproductive benefits by assessing residual change in individuals’ fertility rate over two years; and a socio-structural theory that cooperative gender beliefs arise to justify the inequalities encompassed in heterosexual parenthood. Finally, Study 3 distinguishes cooperative gender beliefs endorsed by individuals vs. cooperative gender beliefs endorsed by societies more broadly to understand how these beliefs palliate feelings of injustice, thereby alleviating the negative effects of inequalities on individuals’ subjective wellbeing. Together these studies advance our understanding of how cooperative gender beliefs justify gender inequalities and thus function to offset some of the harm that inequality causes women.</p>
Title: Cooperative gender beliefs and cost-benefit trade-offs of gender inequality
Description:
<p>Cooperative gender beliefs are characterizations of women, men and heterosexual relationships that focus on positive aspects of traditional traits and roles, and heterosexual interdependency, but ultimately rationalize gender inequality.
Approaches to cooperative gender beliefs vary by discipline, resulting in different theories and terminology.
Terms such as benevolent sexism, gender-specific-meritocracy, and traditional gender beliefs refer to similar clusters of beliefs that are associated with gender inequalities.
By specifying the different types, functions, and levels of cooperative gender beliefs, this thesis provides a systematic study that investigates why people would adopt beliefs that perpetuate harmful gender inequalities.
This line of study tests evidence for the perspective that cooperative gender beliefs manage trade-offs between the costs and the benefits of living in societies with unequal gender relations.
I conceptualize different types of gender beliefs as cooperative, and investigate the extent to which they are linked with trade-offs involved in inequality at the individual level, such as doing unfair amounts of housework, and the societal level, such as being relatively less impacted by gender inequalities.
I present three empirical studies.
Study 1 explores different types of cooperative gender beliefs and how they are linked to gendered divisions of labour.
Study 2 investigates evidence for an evolutionarily informed theory that cooperative gender beliefs function to increase reproductive benefits by assessing residual change in individuals’ fertility rate over two years; and a socio-structural theory that cooperative gender beliefs arise to justify the inequalities encompassed in heterosexual parenthood.
Finally, Study 3 distinguishes cooperative gender beliefs endorsed by individuals vs.
cooperative gender beliefs endorsed by societies more broadly to understand how these beliefs palliate feelings of injustice, thereby alleviating the negative effects of inequalities on individuals’ subjective wellbeing.
Together these studies advance our understanding of how cooperative gender beliefs justify gender inequalities and thus function to offset some of the harm that inequality causes women.
</p>.
Related Results
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Analysis of the current situation of agricultural trade development between China and Ukraine
Purpose. As a European granary, Ukraine has rich agricultural resources. China is a country with a large population and has a large demand for food. However, the agricultural trade...
Infrastructure development, informal economy, and gender inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa
Infrastructure development, informal economy, and gender inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa
Infrastructure development policies have been criticised for lacking a deliberate pro-gender and pro-informal sector orientation. Since African economies are dual enclaves, with th...
Drivers of Income Inequality in Ireland and Northern Ireland
Drivers of Income Inequality in Ireland and Northern Ireland
The distribution of income differs in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Historically, Northern Ireland has been marked by lower levels of income and lower income inequality. The Gini c...
Impacts of Petrophysical Cut-Offs in Reservoir Models
Impacts of Petrophysical Cut-Offs in Reservoir Models
Abstract
Petrophysical cut-offs are commonly applied so as to discard non-producing pay, yet, several aspects must be balanced one against the other in the process.
...
Income Inequality and Advanced Democracies
Income Inequality and Advanced Democracies
Over the past several decades, social scientists from a wide range of disciplines have produced a rich body of scholarship addressing the growing phenomenon of income inequality ac...
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
The role and significance of the Bosnian nobility in the historical currents of medieval Bosnia can be reliably traced in the 14th and 15th centuries when various socio-political f...
Balanced Trade
Balanced Trade
How should a principled nation which believes in the benefits of mutually beneficial trade respond to the predations of mercantilist trading partners and imbalanced trade? Many arg...
An Exploratory Study of Mathematics Anxiety in Caribbean Preservice Teachers
An Exploratory Study of Mathematics Anxiety in Caribbean Preservice Teachers
The Problem Correlational studies suggest that gender, attitudes to mathematics, mathematics performance, the number of college mathematics courses taken, and mathematics teacher ...


