Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Brains, Neuroscience, and Animalism: On the Implications of Thinking Brains
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe neuroscience revolution has led many scientists to posit “expansive” or “thinking” brains that instantiate rich psychological properties. As a result, some scientists now even claim you are identical to such a brain. However, Eric Olson has offered new arguments that thinking brains cannot exist due to their intuitively “abominable” implications. After situating the commitment to thinking brains in the wider scientific discussions in which they are posited, I then critically assess Olson's arguments against such entities. Although highlighting an important insight, I show that Olson's objections to the existence of thinking brains fail and that a wider discussion engaging our new empirical findings is actually required in order to resolve the deeper issues.
Title: Brains, Neuroscience, and Animalism: On the Implications of Thinking Brains
Description:
AbstractThe neuroscience revolution has led many scientists to posit “expansive” or “thinking” brains that instantiate rich psychological properties.
As a result, some scientists now even claim you are identical to such a brain.
However, Eric Olson has offered new arguments that thinking brains cannot exist due to their intuitively “abominable” implications.
After situating the commitment to thinking brains in the wider scientific discussions in which they are posited, I then critically assess Olson's arguments against such entities.
Although highlighting an important insight, I show that Olson's objections to the existence of thinking brains fail and that a wider discussion engaging our new empirical findings is actually required in order to resolve the deeper issues.
Related Results
Animalism and Person Essentialism
Animalism and Person Essentialism
Abstract
Animalism is the view that human persons are human animals – biological organisms that belong to the species Homo sapiens. This paper concerns a family of m...
ANIMALISM IS EITHER FALSE OR UNINTERESTING (PERHAPS BOTH)
ANIMALISM IS EITHER FALSE OR UNINTERESTING (PERHAPS BOTH)
Abstract“We are animals.” That’s what animalists say—that’s their slogan. But what animalists mean by their slogan varies. Many animalists are adamant that what they mean—and, inde...
Thought experiments, sentience, and animalism
Thought experiments, sentience, and animalism
AbstractAnimalism is prima facie the most plausible view about what we are; it aligns better with science and common sense, and is metaphysically more parsimonious. Thought experim...
Varieties of Animalism
Varieties of Animalism
AbstractAnimalism in its basic form is the view that we are animals. Whether it is a thesis about anything else – like what the conditions of our persistence through time are or wh...
Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains
Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains
AbstractIn this systematic review, we highlight the differences between the male and female zebrafish brains to understand their differentiation and their use in studying sex-speci...
Generic Animalism
Generic Animalism
The animalist says we are animals. This thesis is commonly understood as the universal generalization that all human persons are human animals. This article proposes an alternative...
WHAT IS ANIMALISM?
WHAT IS ANIMALISM?
AbstractOne increasingly popular approach to personal identity is called ‘animalism.’ Unfortunately, it is unclear just what the doctrine says. In this paper, I criticise several d...