Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The future‐like‐ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism
View through CrossRef
AbstractWhich metaphysical theories are involved—whether presupposed or implied—in Marquis’ future‐like‐ours (FLO) argument against abortion? Vogelstein has recently argued that the supporter of the FLO argument faces a problematic dilemma; in particular, Marquis, the main supporter of the argument, seems to have to either (a) abandon diachronic universalism (DU) or (b) acquiesce and declare that contraception is morally wrong. I argue that the premises of Marquis’ argument can be reasonably combined with a form of unrestricted composition and that the FLO argument is better viewed as including animalism, i.e., the thesis that we are animals.
Title: The future‐like‐ours argument, animalism, and mereological universalism
Description:
AbstractWhich metaphysical theories are involved—whether presupposed or implied—in Marquis’ future‐like‐ours (FLO) argument against abortion? Vogelstein has recently argued that the supporter of the FLO argument faces a problematic dilemma; in particular, Marquis, the main supporter of the argument, seems to have to either (a) abandon diachronic universalism (DU) or (b) acquiesce and declare that contraception is morally wrong.
I argue that the premises of Marquis’ argument can be reasonably combined with a form of unrestricted composition and that the FLO argument is better viewed as including animalism, i.
e.
, the thesis that we are animals.
Related Results
Varieties of Universalism
Varieties of Universalism
Universalism can be religious or secular; within the category of secular universalism, a distinction can be made (especially in China) between universalism focused on ‘universality...
Animalism and Person Essentialism
Animalism and Person Essentialism
Abstract
Animalism is the view that human persons are human animals – biological organisms that belong to the species Homo sapiens. This paper concerns a family of m...
ANIMALISM IS EITHER FALSE OR UNINTERESTING (PERHAPS BOTH)
ANIMALISM IS EITHER FALSE OR UNINTERESTING (PERHAPS BOTH)
Abstract“We are animals.” That’s what animalists say—that’s their slogan. But what animalists mean by their slogan varies. Many animalists are adamant that what they mean—and, inde...
Varieties of Animalism
Varieties of Animalism
AbstractAnimalism in its basic form is the view that we are animals. Whether it is a thesis about anything else – like what the conditions of our persistence through time are or wh...
French universalist disparities: A racial capitalist reading of French universalism
French universalist disparities: A racial capitalist reading of French universalism
This article unveils how the French political ideology of universalism benefits from the perpetual racialization of others. Drawing from various definitions and understandings of r...
Revisiting universalism in the Finnish education system
Revisiting universalism in the Finnish education system
The aim of the article is to revisit the principle of universalism and analyze how it has changed in the legislation on compulsory education by asking: how are different characteri...
Mereological Syntax
Mereological Syntax
An argument for replacing Chomsky’s set-theoretic Merge view of syntax with a theory of syntax based on mereological objects.
Mereology is the study of parthood—w...
Thought experiments, sentience, and animalism
Thought experiments, sentience, and animalism
AbstractAnimalism is prima facie the most plausible view about what we are; it aligns better with science and common sense, and is metaphysically more parsimonious. Thought experim...

