Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Státnost druhé republiky a její tvůrci

View through CrossRef
Doc. PhDr. Jan Rataj, CSc., of the Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, presented an article called “Statehood of the Second Republic and Its Creators”. He is not confined only or mainly to the international position of the “Second Republic” and the relations of curtailed Czecho-Slovakia to Germany in particular. For him the Second Republic is not only a victim of inevitably following stage of pressure from outside. He deals mainly with the placement of powers and working of streams in domestic policy of state and he discusses the internal situation of a curtailed Czecho-Slovakia. He does not pay much attention to what was going on in Slovakia after Munich. He concentrates first of all on the people, directions and streams of the Czech-Moravian scene, for which Munich was either simply victory or at least sufficient satisfaction, a proof showing that they “had always been right in their scepticism to Czechoslovak statehood in general and to Masaryk’s idea of a democratic state in particular”. The author deals with various bearers of these ideas, various – as he calls them – winners in “autumn revolution”. And again, he does not high light the role of Czech fascists, who were later for six years trying to persuade the invaders that they would be more reliable and ardent collaborators than the protectorate government and official administration. The author deals mostly with bearers of the idea of so-called “Saint Wenceslas statehood”. This idea, to which the Second Republic gave birth, was abused by the invaders for the final solution of the Czech Question. The author illustrates this fact by a quotation of Adolf Hitler, who says: “Hácha must be presented as one of the greatest men of the world, if he leaves a testament for Czechs, that will mean their end. His name must be pronounced together with the name of King Wenceslas, so that any coward can refer to him. His successor? Not a real man! We will always get along with cowards more easily than with brave men. Best we will do Czechs in if we influence them through that kind of people, without a break and for a long period of time.” (A. Hitler, Monologues in the Leader’s Main Seat 1941–1944, ed. J. Hrbek, Prague, 1995, p. 186.)
Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press
Title: Státnost druhé republiky a její tvůrci
Description:
Doc.
PhDr.
Jan Rataj, CSc.
, of the Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, presented an article called “Statehood of the Second Republic and Its Creators”.
He is not confined only or mainly to the international position of the “Second Republic” and the relations of curtailed Czecho-Slovakia to Germany in particular.
For him the Second Republic is not only a victim of inevitably following stage of pressure from outside.
He deals mainly with the placement of powers and working of streams in domestic policy of state and he discusses the internal situation of a curtailed Czecho-Slovakia.
He does not pay much attention to what was going on in Slovakia after Munich.
He concentrates first of all on the people, directions and streams of the Czech-Moravian scene, for which Munich was either simply victory or at least sufficient satisfaction, a proof showing that they “had always been right in their scepticism to Czechoslovak statehood in general and to Masaryk’s idea of a democratic state in particular”.
The author deals with various bearers of these ideas, various – as he calls them – winners in “autumn revolution”.
And again, he does not high light the role of Czech fascists, who were later for six years trying to persuade the invaders that they would be more reliable and ardent collaborators than the protectorate government and official administration.
The author deals mostly with bearers of the idea of so-called “Saint Wenceslas statehood”.
This idea, to which the Second Republic gave birth, was abused by the invaders for the final solution of the Czech Question.
The author illustrates this fact by a quotation of Adolf Hitler, who says: “Hácha must be presented as one of the greatest men of the world, if he leaves a testament for Czechs, that will mean their end.
His name must be pronounced together with the name of King Wenceslas, so that any coward can refer to him.
His successor? Not a real man! We will always get along with cowards more easily than with brave men.
Best we will do Czechs in if we influence them through that kind of people, without a break and for a long period of time.
” (A.
Hitler, Monologues in the Leader’s Main Seat 1941–1944, ed.
J.
Hrbek, Prague, 1995, p.
186.
).

Related Results

Teorie sociálního státu v soudobé historiografii
Teorie sociálního státu v soudobé historiografii
Tento článek se zaměřuje na teorii sociálního státu a její využití v historickém výzkumu. První část pojednává o dvou klasických interpretačních přístupech užívaných v sociologii, ...
„Obecné dějiny“, „obsahová filozofie dějin“ a evoluční teorie
„Obecné dějiny“, „obsahová filozofie dějin“ a evoluční teorie
Autor ve svém diskusním příspěvku analyzuje vztah mezi „obecnými dějinami“ a „obsahovou filozofií“ dějin. Spolu s tím odpovídá na otázku, jakou roli hraje v historicko-vědním pozná...
Objektivistická etika Ayn Randové
Objektivistická etika Ayn Randové
Objektivistická filosofie Ayn Randové je i v současnosti myšlenkový směr, k němuž se někteří lidé aktivně hlásí a který zároveň představuje ideovou inspiraci některých směrů politi...
Objektivistická etika Ayn Randové
Objektivistická etika Ayn Randové
Objektivistická filosofie Ayn Randové je i v současnosti myšlenkový směr, k němuž se někteří lidé aktivně hlásí a který zároveň představuje ideovou inspiraci některých směrů politi...
Micha Ullman
Micha Ullman
Tento text si klade za cíl předvést důležitou edukační interpretační praxi,která souvisí s analýzou edukovaného díla, totiž s budováním zdůvodněnéhokontextu pro vybranou strategii....
Odpověď na komentáře
Odpověď na komentáře
Autorka v pojednání odpovídá na čtyři reflexe své knihy Hegelova fenomenologie světa. V první části se věnuje základním pojmům, tak jak je komentuje Pirmin Stekeler, který vyzdvihu...
Odpověď na komentáře
Odpověď na komentáře
Autorka v pojednání odpovídá na čtyři reflexe své knihy Hegelova fenomenologie světa. V první části se věnuje základním pojmům, tak jak je komentuje Pirmin Stekeler, který vyzdvihu...
Dyskretna apologia starości w twórczości Milana Kundery
Dyskretna apologia starości w twórczości Milana Kundery
A discreet apology of old agein the works of Milan KunderaIn the essay, the titular problem of old age is related to the great literary canon, within which the history of novel is ...

Back to Top