Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY (IN TERMS OF STONE EXPULSION) OF TAMSULOSIN VERSUS NIFEDIPINE IN DISTAL URETERIC STONE

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT:INTRODUCTION: In western prosperous countries, a great research has been done on these two medicines in urolithiasis. Extent of disease is varying from developing countries to developed countries, specially due to late identification of diseases, late in examination which enhances the consequences of disease in ureteral stone or in any other disease. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy (in terms of stone expulsion) of tamsulosin versus nifedipine in victims with distal ureteral stone. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All of 86 patients with distal ureteric stone, 20 to 50 years of both genders were included. Patients with proximal ureteric stricture, gross hydronephrosis, previous ureteral surgery and solitary kidney were excluded. After informed, written consent, all selected cases were divided in two groups by lottery method. In group A patients, tamsulosin was given while in group B patients, nifedipine was given. All patients were followed weekly by the researcher till 4 weeks and ultrasonography in both groups was done by the one consultant radiologist for evaluation of efficacy. RESULTS: Mean age was 32.29 ± 6.81 years. Out of these 86 patients, 53 (61.63%) were male and 33 (38.37%) were females with. Mean size of stone was 6.69±1.49 mm. Stone expulsion was seen in 37 (86.05%) patients in group A (tamsulosin group) and 25 (58.14%) patients in group B (nifedipine group) with p-value of 0.004. CONCLUSION: This survey concluded that efficacy (in terms of stone expulsion) of tamsulosin is better as compared to nifedipine in distal ureteric stone
Title: COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY (IN TERMS OF STONE EXPULSION) OF TAMSULOSIN VERSUS NIFEDIPINE IN DISTAL URETERIC STONE
Description:
ABSTRACT:INTRODUCTION: In western prosperous countries, a great research has been done on these two medicines in urolithiasis.
Extent of disease is varying from developing countries to developed countries, specially due to late identification of diseases, late in examination which enhances the consequences of disease in ureteral stone or in any other disease.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy (in terms of stone expulsion) of tamsulosin versus nifedipine in victims with distal ureteral stone.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: All of 86 patients with distal ureteric stone, 20 to 50 years of both genders were included.
Patients with proximal ureteric stricture, gross hydronephrosis, previous ureteral surgery and solitary kidney were excluded.
After informed, written consent, all selected cases were divided in two groups by lottery method.
In group A patients, tamsulosin was given while in group B patients, nifedipine was given.
All patients were followed weekly by the researcher till 4 weeks and ultrasonography in both groups was done by the one consultant radiologist for evaluation of efficacy.
RESULTS: Mean age was 32.
29 ± 6.
81 years.
Out of these 86 patients, 53 (61.
63%) were male and 33 (38.
37%) were females with.
Mean size of stone was 6.
69±1.
49 mm.
Stone expulsion was seen in 37 (86.
05%) patients in group A (tamsulosin group) and 25 (58.
14%) patients in group B (nifedipine group) with p-value of 0.
004.
CONCLUSION: This survey concluded that efficacy (in terms of stone expulsion) of tamsulosin is better as compared to nifedipine in distal ureteric stone.

Related Results

Role of low-dose deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin alone for medical expulsive therapy of ureteric stone
Role of low-dose deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin alone for medical expulsive therapy of ureteric stone
Background: Urolithiasis is a common condition in daily urological practice. Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) is non-invasive approach for removal of ureteric stone. In MET, alpha-b...
Role of low-dose deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin alone for medical expulsive therapy of ureteric stone
Role of low-dose deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin alone for medical expulsive therapy of ureteric stone
Background: Urolithiasis is a common condition in daily urological practice. Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) is non-invasive approach for removal of ureteric stone. In MET, alpha-b...
COMPARISON OF SILODOSIN AND TAMSULOSIN IN THE MEDICAL EXPULSION THERAPY OF MID AND LOWER URETERIC STONES
COMPARISON OF SILODOSIN AND TAMSULOSIN IN THE MEDICAL EXPULSION THERAPY OF MID AND LOWER URETERIC STONES
Background: Medical expulsive therapy (MET), which is widely used to treat ureteric stones, is practiced mainly with alpha-blockers such as silodosin and tamsulosin. However, furth...
Efficacy of Tamsulosin as Compared to Placebo, in Reducing Post Operative Flank Pain during Voiding, in Patients with Ureteric Stent
Efficacy of Tamsulosin as Compared to Placebo, in Reducing Post Operative Flank Pain during Voiding, in Patients with Ureteric Stent
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin in reducing post operative flank pain during voiding, in patients with ureteric stent. Study Design: This is a Randomized co...
Tamsulosin and risk of priapism: A causality assessment using Austin Bradford Hill Criteria
Tamsulosin and risk of priapism: A causality assessment using Austin Bradford Hill Criteria
AbstractTamsulosin hydrochloride, a selective alpha‐adrenergic blocking agent has been previously associated with priapism. Priapism is a medically serious condition that, if not i...

Back to Top