Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PERSPECTIVE ON COVID-19 AND HEALTH CARE SERVICE DURING THE PANDEMIC

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have experienced changes to the routine management of their conditions during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The disease as well IBD treatment frequently require immunosuppressant medications, which could increase their risk of infection. The aim of this study was to determine patients’ experience of the health care service, including the restrictions of hospitals visits made in Norway from Mars 12th 2020. Method From June 18 to September 18 2020, all patients at the IBD outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital in Norway on biological therapy or other immunosuppressant’s were included. A questionnaire including patients concerns regarding their disease, medical therapy and COVID-19, as well as their health care service needs in follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Altogether 506 IBD patients answered a paper-based questionnaire. The mean age was 40.78 (SD 14.71), 289/506 (57%) men, ulcerative colitis 199/506 (39%), Crohn’s disease 307/506 (61%). Sixty-three patients (12.5%) used biological therapy in combination with azathioprine or steroids. Ninety-one (18.2%) were in obligated quarantine with negative test. Five patients (4.9%) tested positive to SARS- CoV-2 of the 98 patients tested, (1.0% of the total sample). One third of the IBD patients perceived they had increased risk for being infected by SARS- CoV-2 because of the immunosuppressive drugs they used. Nonetheless, 496/506 (98.6%) of the patients adhered to continuing their medication. One-hundred and sixty-one (32.3%) voluntarily isolated, and 21/506 (4.2%) was in sick leave being afraid of being infected. Furthermore, 20/506 (4.0%) cancelled their consultation because they were afraid of being infected from SARS- CoV-2 at the hospital. The hospital changed physical consultation to telephone consultation for 75/506 (15.0%) of the patients. Thirty-eight patients (7.6%) reported that they were afraid of going to the hospital because of restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and 18/506 (3.6%) did not feel safe when at hospital. Approximately half of the IBD patients (219/506) were satisfied with the information provided by physician about medical treatment for IBD and Covid-19 while 398/506 (77.3%) were satisfied with the information from health-care providers about restrictions due to COVID-19. There were no statistical differences between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Conclusion IBD patients on biological treatment and immunosuppressives took precautions because of fear of being infected with SARS- CoV-2. At the same time, they adhere to medical treatment regimens and follow-up at the hospital. Most patients were satisfied with the information they received from physicians and other health-care workers. One percent tested positive to SARS-CoV-2.
Title: PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PERSPECTIVE ON COVID-19 AND HEALTH CARE SERVICE DURING THE PANDEMIC
Description:
Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have experienced changes to the routine management of their conditions during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.
The disease as well IBD treatment frequently require immunosuppressant medications, which could increase their risk of infection.
The aim of this study was to determine patients’ experience of the health care service, including the restrictions of hospitals visits made in Norway from Mars 12th 2020.
Method From June 18 to September 18 2020, all patients at the IBD outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital in Norway on biological therapy or other immunosuppressant’s were included.
A questionnaire including patients concerns regarding their disease, medical therapy and COVID-19, as well as their health care service needs in follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results Altogether 506 IBD patients answered a paper-based questionnaire.
The mean age was 40.
78 (SD 14.
71), 289/506 (57%) men, ulcerative colitis 199/506 (39%), Crohn’s disease 307/506 (61%).
Sixty-three patients (12.
5%) used biological therapy in combination with azathioprine or steroids.
Ninety-one (18.
2%) were in obligated quarantine with negative test.
Five patients (4.
9%) tested positive to SARS- CoV-2 of the 98 patients tested, (1.
0% of the total sample).
One third of the IBD patients perceived they had increased risk for being infected by SARS- CoV-2 because of the immunosuppressive drugs they used.
Nonetheless, 496/506 (98.
6%) of the patients adhered to continuing their medication.
One-hundred and sixty-one (32.
3%) voluntarily isolated, and 21/506 (4.
2%) was in sick leave being afraid of being infected.
Furthermore, 20/506 (4.
0%) cancelled their consultation because they were afraid of being infected from SARS- CoV-2 at the hospital.
The hospital changed physical consultation to telephone consultation for 75/506 (15.
0%) of the patients.
Thirty-eight patients (7.
6%) reported that they were afraid of going to the hospital because of restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and 18/506 (3.
6%) did not feel safe when at hospital.
Approximately half of the IBD patients (219/506) were satisfied with the information provided by physician about medical treatment for IBD and Covid-19 while 398/506 (77.
3%) were satisfied with the information from health-care providers about restrictions due to COVID-19.
There were no statistical differences between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.
Conclusion IBD patients on biological treatment and immunosuppressives took precautions because of fear of being infected with SARS- CoV-2.
At the same time, they adhere to medical treatment regimens and follow-up at the hospital.
Most patients were satisfied with the information they received from physicians and other health-care workers.
One percent tested positive to SARS-CoV-2.

Related Results

KECEMASAN SAAT PANDEMI COVID 19: LITERATUR REVIEW Hardiyati, Efri Widianti, Taty Hernawaty Departemen Keperawatan Jiwa Poltekkes Kemenkes Mamuju Sulbar, Universitas Pad...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Cardiac functions and aortic elasticity in children with inflammatory bowel disease: effect of age at disease onset
Cardiac functions and aortic elasticity in children with inflammatory bowel disease: effect of age at disease onset
AbstractAim:Childhood onset inflammatory bowel disease is more aggressive and has rapidly progressive clinical course than adult inflammatory bowel disease. Early-onset inflammator...
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Abstract: Background: ECF most frequently follows a complication of abdominal surgery, although a smaller number occur spontaneously in association with conditia Background: Entero...
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
The pandemic Covid-19 currently demands teachers to be able to use technology in teaching and learning process. But in reality there are still many teachers who have not been able ...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

Back to Top