Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bad Faith in Film Spectatorship

View through CrossRef
This article seeks to develop an under-appreciated aspect of spectator activity: the way in which viewers make use of film to enter or sustain a project of bad faith. Based on Jean-Paul Sartre's account of bad faith in Being and Nothingness (1943), the article explains the aspects of bad faith that are pertinent to viewer activity, then explores the way viewers can make use of filmic depictions to facilitate self-denial. For example, spectators may emphasize the fact that persons are depicted in narrow terms as corroboration for their belief that human nature is just as its depicted, thereby denying that we have the freedom to be otherwise. Or spectators may deny the relevance of problematic aspects of themselves when they find it depicted in characters who are admirable in other ways. I then consider whether films themselves can be described as being in bad faith. While technically they cannot, I identify ways that a film may encourage or discourage bad faith in viewers. I also examine how the immersive aspect of film enables viewers to turn attention away from themselves while they engage in self-denial. The case for this approach to viewer activity and film analysis is supplemented by a distinction between traits that do apply to film, e.g., being racist, sexist, or homophobic, and the resources it gives persons to be in bad faith about these social attitudes. I argue that a film can have traits like these while not encouraging bad faith and vice versa, demonstrating the unique perspective offered by approaching film and spectator activity in terms of bad faith.
Edinburgh University Press
Title: Bad Faith in Film Spectatorship
Description:
This article seeks to develop an under-appreciated aspect of spectator activity: the way in which viewers make use of film to enter or sustain a project of bad faith.
Based on Jean-Paul Sartre's account of bad faith in Being and Nothingness (1943), the article explains the aspects of bad faith that are pertinent to viewer activity, then explores the way viewers can make use of filmic depictions to facilitate self-denial.
For example, spectators may emphasize the fact that persons are depicted in narrow terms as corroboration for their belief that human nature is just as its depicted, thereby denying that we have the freedom to be otherwise.
Or spectators may deny the relevance of problematic aspects of themselves when they find it depicted in characters who are admirable in other ways.
I then consider whether films themselves can be described as being in bad faith.
While technically they cannot, I identify ways that a film may encourage or discourage bad faith in viewers.
I also examine how the immersive aspect of film enables viewers to turn attention away from themselves while they engage in self-denial.
The case for this approach to viewer activity and film analysis is supplemented by a distinction between traits that do apply to film, e.
g.
, being racist, sexist, or homophobic, and the resources it gives persons to be in bad faith about these social attitudes.
I argue that a film can have traits like these while not encouraging bad faith and vice versa, demonstrating the unique perspective offered by approaching film and spectator activity in terms of bad faith.

Related Results

What’s Bad about Friendship with Bad People?
What’s Bad about Friendship with Bad People?
AbstractIs there something bad about being friends with seriously bad people? Intuitively, it seems so, but it is hard to see why this should be. This is especially the case since ...
“Faith so as to Remove Mountains”
“Faith so as to Remove Mountains”
The presence of πίστις in the list of spiritual gifts in1 Cor 12:8-10 is problematic. Should not faith be the common basis of the charisms and not a particular gift? What means “fa...
On bad groups, bad fields, and pseudoplanes
On bad groups, bad fields, and pseudoplanes
Cherlin introduced the concept of bad groups (of finite Morley rank) in [Ch1]. The existence of such groups is an open question. If they exist, they will contradict the Cherlin-Zil...
Type two cuts, bad cuts and very bad cut
Type two cuts, bad cuts and very bad cut
AbstractType two cuts, bad cuts and very bad cuts are introduced in [10] for studying the relationship between Loeb measure and U-topology of a hyperfinite time line in an ω1-satur...
Statues, History, and Identity: How Bad Public History Statues Wrong
Statues, History, and Identity: How Bad Public History Statues Wrong
AbstractThere has recently been a focus on the question of statue removalism. This concerns what to do with public history statues that honor or otherwise celebrate ethically bad h...
Humanities
Humanities
James E. Côté and Anton L. Allahar, Lowering Higher Education: The Rise of Corporate Universities and the Fall of Liberal Education, reviewed by glen a. jones Daniel Coleman and S...
Romantic Film-Philosophy and the Notion of Philosophical Film Criticism
Romantic Film-Philosophy and the Notion of Philosophical Film Criticism
A common critique directed at many philosophical readings of films is that they fall short of paying careful attention to film aesthetics. The film-philosopher Robert Sinnerbrink, ...
How to deliver bad news to me? Suggestions for preparing Muslim patients before breaking bad news
How to deliver bad news to me? Suggestions for preparing Muslim patients before breaking bad news
There are several models for delivering bad news, the most important and widely used being the SPIKES protocol. Cultural differences in breaking bad news in different societies wit...

Back to Top