Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Study on the Difference in Aging Characteristics of Sensitive and Non‐Sensitive Skin

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACTBackgroundAccording to Euromonitor and T Mall data statistics from 2017 to 2022, the Chinese market for sensitive skin (SS) skincare is growing by 20% every year, and anti‐aging concept cosmetics for sensitive skin are becoming popular. There are few studies on the difference in aging between sensitive and non‐sensitive skin.ObjectivesThis study is to determine whether sensitive skin ages faster than non‐sensitive skin.MethodEighty subjects aged 25–50 years each from sensitive and non‐sensitive skin participated in this clinical trial. trans‐epidermal water loss (TEWL), CIE‐L* a*b* values, gloss, hydration, sebum content, dermis density, elasticity, wrinkles, smoothness, artificial intelligence (AI)‐estimated skin age, and pores were evaluated in subjects with sensitive and non‐sensitive skin.ResultsIn the 25‐ to 29‐year‐old group, the pore score and nasolabial fold count of non‐sensitive skin were significantly lower than those of sensitive skin (p < 0.05), but the transparency was significantly higher than that of sensitive skin (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between groups in the MAE value between AI skin age and chronological age, and the AI‐estimated skin age of sensitive skin is significantly older than that of non‐sensitive skin (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between sensitive and non‐sensitive skin in other parameters (p > 0.05). In the 30‐ to 34‐year‐old group, the TEWL value and a* value of non‐sensitive skin are significantly lower than those of sensitive skin, but the L* value and glossiness are significantly higher than those of sensitive skin (p < 0.05). There is no statistical difference in other parameters between sensitive and non‐sensitive skin (p > 0.05). In the 35‐ to 50‐year‐old group, sensitive skin demonstrated better performance only in crow's feet compared to non‐sensitive skin, with no significant differences observed in other parameters between the groups. (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe phenomenon of premature aging in sensitive skin is more obvious, but as age increases, the difference in aging is not obvious. Early anti‐aging care for sensitive skin is necessary.
Title: A Study on the Difference in Aging Characteristics of Sensitive and Non‐Sensitive Skin
Description:
ABSTRACTBackgroundAccording to Euromonitor and T Mall data statistics from 2017 to 2022, the Chinese market for sensitive skin (SS) skincare is growing by 20% every year, and anti‐aging concept cosmetics for sensitive skin are becoming popular.
There are few studies on the difference in aging between sensitive and non‐sensitive skin.
ObjectivesThis study is to determine whether sensitive skin ages faster than non‐sensitive skin.
MethodEighty subjects aged 25–50 years each from sensitive and non‐sensitive skin participated in this clinical trial.
trans‐epidermal water loss (TEWL), CIE‐L* a*b* values, gloss, hydration, sebum content, dermis density, elasticity, wrinkles, smoothness, artificial intelligence (AI)‐estimated skin age, and pores were evaluated in subjects with sensitive and non‐sensitive skin.
ResultsIn the 25‐ to 29‐year‐old group, the pore score and nasolabial fold count of non‐sensitive skin were significantly lower than those of sensitive skin (p < 0.
05), but the transparency was significantly higher than that of sensitive skin (p < 0.
05).
There was a significant difference between groups in the MAE value between AI skin age and chronological age, and the AI‐estimated skin age of sensitive skin is significantly older than that of non‐sensitive skin (p < 0.
05).
There were no significant differences between sensitive and non‐sensitive skin in other parameters (p > 0.
05).
In the 30‐ to 34‐year‐old group, the TEWL value and a* value of non‐sensitive skin are significantly lower than those of sensitive skin, but the L* value and glossiness are significantly higher than those of sensitive skin (p < 0.
05).
There is no statistical difference in other parameters between sensitive and non‐sensitive skin (p > 0.
05).
In the 35‐ to 50‐year‐old group, sensitive skin demonstrated better performance only in crow's feet compared to non‐sensitive skin, with no significant differences observed in other parameters between the groups.
(p > 0.
05).
ConclusionThe phenomenon of premature aging in sensitive skin is more obvious, but as age increases, the difference in aging is not obvious.
Early anti‐aging care for sensitive skin is necessary.

Related Results

Successful Aging
Successful Aging
The emerging concept of successful aging is based on evidence that in healthy individual when they get aged, there are  considerable variations in physiological functions alteratio...
Successful Aging
Successful Aging
The emerging concept of successful aging is based on evidence that in healthy individual when they get aged, there are  considerable variations in physiological functions alterati...
EPD Electronic Pathogen Detection v1
EPD Electronic Pathogen Detection v1
Electronic pathogen detection (EPD) is a non - invasive, rapid, affordable, point- of- care test, for Covid 19 resulting from infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus. EPD scanning techno...
Effects of Oral Supplementation of TrichovitalsTM on Human Skin, Hair and Nail Physiology
Effects of Oral Supplementation of TrichovitalsTM on Human Skin, Hair and Nail Physiology
In this study, Microcore’s oral supplements of TrichovitalsTM contains Collagen type (I,III,V,X), elastin, ellagic acid, Sabbery b glucogallin, Biotin, Curcumin C3 reduct ODN and M...
Effects of Oral Supplementation of Muttaijow complexTM on Human Skin, Hair and Nail Physiology
Effects of Oral Supplementation of Muttaijow complexTM on Human Skin, Hair and Nail Physiology
In this study, Microcore’s oral supplements of Muttaijow ComplexTM obtained from the egg shell that contains naturally occurring collagen Type (I, V, X), Elastin (Desmosine and iso...
Epigenetics insights from perceived facial aging
Epigenetics insights from perceived facial aging
AbstractFacial aging is the most visible manifestation of aging. People desire to look younger than others of the same chronological age. Hence, perceived age is often used as a vi...
Ovarian Aging and Reproduction
Ovarian Aging and Reproduction
The ovary plays a very significant role in aging. The regenerative capacity of stem cells is the key factor to promote healthy aging, and the stem cell viability would decline shar...
Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of Cast Beta-Type Titanium Alloy by Aging Treatment
Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of Cast Beta-Type Titanium Alloy by Aging Treatment
Beta type Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr alloy (TNTZ) is one of the titanium alloys which have gained much attention in dental applications. Dental precision casting is predominant for fabrica...

Back to Top