Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Impossibility of Kantian Immortality
View through CrossRef
When we discuss Kant's views on immortality we are walking in the by-ways of Kantian exegesis. Kant's views on immortality are interesting in themselves, but even within the Kantian framework, they do not affect other topics of importance. It is true that Kant felt that the possibility of immortality was necessary for certain moral manoeuvres to be possible, but he thought that the existence of God was even more essential, so that particular battle is lost regardless. On the other hand, some at least of Kant's views are shared by other people, and if he is wrong, not just over points of detail, but in a thoroughgoing way, that might be worth pointing out, and notjust as a matter of exegesis. And, I shall try to show, Kant is not only wrong, but necessarily wrong. Not only is his version of immortality impossible, but any version resembling his is also impossible. I shall discuss the topic under three main headings: first, I shall mention the views which led Kant to his doctrine of immortality; secondly, I shall try to bring out some of the important points which his doctrine involves; and, finally, I shall indulge briefly in what I hope will be the - by then - fairly superfluous task of showing why such a doctrine won't, after all do.
Title: The Impossibility of Kantian Immortality
Description:
When we discuss Kant's views on immortality we are walking in the by-ways of Kantian exegesis.
Kant's views on immortality are interesting in themselves, but even within the Kantian framework, they do not affect other topics of importance.
It is true that Kant felt that the possibility of immortality was necessary for certain moral manoeuvres to be possible, but he thought that the existence of God was even more essential, so that particular battle is lost regardless.
On the other hand, some at least of Kant's views are shared by other people, and if he is wrong, not just over points of detail, but in a thoroughgoing way, that might be worth pointing out, and notjust as a matter of exegesis.
And, I shall try to show, Kant is not only wrong, but necessarily wrong.
Not only is his version of immortality impossible, but any version resembling his is also impossible.
I shall discuss the topic under three main headings: first, I shall mention the views which led Kant to his doctrine of immortality; secondly, I shall try to bring out some of the important points which his doctrine involves; and, finally, I shall indulge briefly in what I hope will be the - by then - fairly superfluous task of showing why such a doctrine won't, after all do.
Related Results
UNDER AN UNSTARRY SKY: KANTIAN ETHICS AND RADICAL EVIL
UNDER AN UNSTARRY SKY: KANTIAN ETHICS AND RADICAL EVIL
Kantian ethics and concept concerning “radical evil” represent one of the most interesting facets of moral reflection of German philosopher. Using anthropological and philosophical...
Form and Freedom: The Kantian Ethos of Musical Formalism
Form and Freedom: The Kantian Ethos of Musical Formalism
Musical formalism is often portrayed as the enemy of artistic freedom. Its main representative, Eduard Hanslick, is seen as a purist who, by emphasizing musical rules, aims at rest...
SLAVES, GLADIATORS, AND DEATH: KANTIAN LIBERALISM AND THE MORAL LIMITS OF CONSENT
SLAVES, GLADIATORS, AND DEATH: KANTIAN LIBERALISM AND THE MORAL LIMITS OF CONSENT
ABSTRACTIrving Kristol invoked the example of voluntary gladiatorial contests to show that liberalism's commitment to personal autonomy cannot override majoritarian standards of mo...
Music in Balance
Music in Balance
This essay argues that musicological interpretations of Immanuel Kant’s music aesthetics tend to misread his stance as a defense of artistic formalism and autonomy—traits that, alt...
Natural Histories of Form
Natural Histories of Form
Arguing that aesthetic preference generates the historical forms of human racial and gender difference in The Descent of Man, Charles Darwin offers an alternative account of aesthe...
The Logic of Secular Sense in Cendrars’ Epic Trilogy
The Logic of Secular Sense in Cendrars’ Epic Trilogy
Abstract
Engaging with Graham Ward’s contention that literature can never be entirely secular, I argue that some pieces of literature can, in fact, tell us a great d...
The Human Version 2.0
The Human Version 2.0
This article investigates new ethnography on AI development relating to imaginaries of technoscientific forms of immortality. As a Think Piece in Analytics, it engages in a somewha...
The Human Version 2.0
The Human Version 2.0
Abstract
This article investigates new ethnography on AI development relating to imaginaries of technoscientific forms of immortality. As a Think Piece in Analytics, it engages in ...