Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Implementing a One Health approach is complex. It demands engaging different sectors and actors in the promotion and protection of human, animal and environmental health. A key challenge for successfully implementing the One Health approach are knowledge translation processes among scientists and policy-makers.
Methods
An online survey reached 104 experts from 23 European countries, working at national agencies or institutes, universities, ministries, non-governmental organisations (World Health Organization, World Organisation for Animal Health), and European Union (EU) agencies. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to describe experts’ perceptions.
Results
This study indicated a lack of networks among scientists and between scientists and policy-makers. Relations of scientists and policy-makers were perceived as challenging due to different interests and priorities, leading to difficulties in reaching political attention for One Health topics. It also highlighted a favoured attention to some One Health topics (e.g. antimicrobial resistance) as opposed to others (e.g. environmental issues). Important international actors to push One Health policies forward were the Quadripartite organisations and EU agencies. National actors (government agencies, national research institutes, universities) were on average perceived to be more important than international actors due to their roles and influences. Factors influencing the knowledge translation process were the different languages spoken by scientists as well as politicians, and an equivocal understanding of the One Health approach.
Conclusion
The study shows the importance of leadership to establish interdisciplinary networks and to problematise One Health issues with clear scope and targets. This will help to link knowledge to needs and capabilities of policy-makers. Establishing strong relationships among national and international actors can encourage networks and raise awareness of the One Health approach to policy-makers. Lastly, promoting research communication skills of scientists can provide a valuable tool to reach policy-makers to enhance attention to One Health topics.
Title: Translating One Health knowledge across different institutional and political contexts in Europe
Description:
Abstract
Background
Implementing a One Health approach is complex.
It demands engaging different sectors and actors in the promotion and protection of human, animal and environmental health.
A key challenge for successfully implementing the One Health approach are knowledge translation processes among scientists and policy-makers.
Methods
An online survey reached 104 experts from 23 European countries, working at national agencies or institutes, universities, ministries, non-governmental organisations (World Health Organization, World Organisation for Animal Health), and European Union (EU) agencies.
Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to describe experts’ perceptions.
Results
This study indicated a lack of networks among scientists and between scientists and policy-makers.
Relations of scientists and policy-makers were perceived as challenging due to different interests and priorities, leading to difficulties in reaching political attention for One Health topics.
It also highlighted a favoured attention to some One Health topics (e.
g.
antimicrobial resistance) as opposed to others (e.
g.
environmental issues).
Important international actors to push One Health policies forward were the Quadripartite organisations and EU agencies.
National actors (government agencies, national research institutes, universities) were on average perceived to be more important than international actors due to their roles and influences.
Factors influencing the knowledge translation process were the different languages spoken by scientists as well as politicians, and an equivocal understanding of the One Health approach.
Conclusion
The study shows the importance of leadership to establish interdisciplinary networks and to problematise One Health issues with clear scope and targets.
This will help to link knowledge to needs and capabilities of policy-makers.
Establishing strong relationships among national and international actors can encourage networks and raise awareness of the One Health approach to policy-makers.
Lastly, promoting research communication skills of scientists can provide a valuable tool to reach policy-makers to enhance attention to One Health topics.
Related Results
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Institutional varieties and entrepreneurship: an empirical analysis
Institutional varieties and entrepreneurship: an empirical analysis
A growing body of literature on comparative international entrepreneurship has focussed on exploring the factors that explain differences in entrepreneurial activity across countri...
Giovanni Paolo II e l’Europa
Giovanni Paolo II e l’Europa
John Paul II and Europe
In his article entitled ‘Una frontiera per l’Europa: dove?’ (The boundary of Europe: where is it located?), published in Vita e Pensiero (October 197...
Social innovation in extreme institutional contexts: the case of Palestine
Social innovation in extreme institutional contexts: the case of Palestine
PurposeThis paper focuses on social innovation dynamics in extreme contexts where institutional volatility is deeply rooted and enduring. In other words, the authors focus their di...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials
Harmonization and streamlining of research oversight for pragmatic clinical trials
The oversight of research involving human participants is a complex process that requires institutional review board review as well as multiple non-institutional review board insti...
Institutional innovations for improved water security in smallholder irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape Provinces, South Africa
Institutional innovations for improved water security in smallholder irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape Provinces, South Africa
Smallholder irrigation schemes are regarded as a key strategy to eliminate poverty and increase food security in rural areas in South Africa. While the South African government has...

