Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Root and leaf litter diversity below‐ground shape soil carbon stabilization and priming through altered decomposition dynamics

View through CrossRef
Abstract Root and leaf turnover is a major contributor to soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and storage. However, while roots of multiple species occur in soils, and leaves are often incorporated to soil by bioturbation processes, it remains unknown how litter mixing in soils influences litter decomposition processes. Particularly, it is unknown how the soil may interact with (e.g. buffer or amplify) the expected redistribution of litter compounds between mixed litters (e.g. nitrogen [N] and tannins), with consequences for litter decomposition and the resulting carbon (C) fluxes controlling the SOC balance. To address this issue, we studied the (almost complete) decomposition of 13 C labelled single leaf and root litters and 15 realistic litter mixtures incorporated into soil in the laboratory. We studied litter mass loss and litter N concentration as litters decomposed, tracked litter 13 C into the mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) and particulate organic matter (POM) fractions of the SOC, and quantified litter influence on native SOC mineralization (i.e. priming). We expected nutrient (in particular N) transfer between litters with dissimilar initial nutrient content to (1) stimulate C loss in mixed litters, although this effect would be potentially hampered by litter tannins, to (2) enhance SOC formation, and (3) limit SOC mineralization. As hypothesized, litter diversity increased litter decomposition rates, yet not due to N transfer and immobilization in decomposing litters. Also unexpectedly, litter tannins dissimilarity enhanced decomposition rates. Plant litter diversity enhanced soil MAOM‐C formation, but had a negligible impact on overall SOC stocks. This occurred because SOC formation and priming mixture effects in the MAOM fraction were counterbalanced by those in the POM fraction. In mixed litters, the dissimilarity in litter manganese (Mn) was responsible for non‐additive MAOM‐C gains and POM‐C losses, suggesting Mn transfer between litters that foster lignin degradation and incorporation into soil MAOM. Litter dissimilarity in Mn also reduced MAOM‐C and increased POM‐C priming. Overall, we demonstrate that diversity effects, potentially implying nutrient transfer between litters, can occur below‐ground among root litters, as well as biologically incorporated leaf litters. It further shows that different nutrients are implicated in diversity effects controlling litter decomposition rate and soil C storage. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Title: Root and leaf litter diversity below‐ground shape soil carbon stabilization and priming through altered decomposition dynamics
Description:
Abstract Root and leaf turnover is a major contributor to soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and storage.
However, while roots of multiple species occur in soils, and leaves are often incorporated to soil by bioturbation processes, it remains unknown how litter mixing in soils influences litter decomposition processes.
Particularly, it is unknown how the soil may interact with (e.
g.
buffer or amplify) the expected redistribution of litter compounds between mixed litters (e.
g.
nitrogen [N] and tannins), with consequences for litter decomposition and the resulting carbon (C) fluxes controlling the SOC balance.
To address this issue, we studied the (almost complete) decomposition of 13 C labelled single leaf and root litters and 15 realistic litter mixtures incorporated into soil in the laboratory.
We studied litter mass loss and litter N concentration as litters decomposed, tracked litter 13 C into the mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) and particulate organic matter (POM) fractions of the SOC, and quantified litter influence on native SOC mineralization (i.
e.
priming).
We expected nutrient (in particular N) transfer between litters with dissimilar initial nutrient content to (1) stimulate C loss in mixed litters, although this effect would be potentially hampered by litter tannins, to (2) enhance SOC formation, and (3) limit SOC mineralization.
As hypothesized, litter diversity increased litter decomposition rates, yet not due to N transfer and immobilization in decomposing litters.
Also unexpectedly, litter tannins dissimilarity enhanced decomposition rates.
Plant litter diversity enhanced soil MAOM‐C formation, but had a negligible impact on overall SOC stocks.
This occurred because SOC formation and priming mixture effects in the MAOM fraction were counterbalanced by those in the POM fraction.
In mixed litters, the dissimilarity in litter manganese (Mn) was responsible for non‐additive MAOM‐C gains and POM‐C losses, suggesting Mn transfer between litters that foster lignin degradation and incorporation into soil MAOM.
Litter dissimilarity in Mn also reduced MAOM‐C and increased POM‐C priming.
Overall, we demonstrate that diversity effects, potentially implying nutrient transfer between litters, can occur below‐ground among root litters, as well as biologically incorporated leaf litters.
It further shows that different nutrients are implicated in diversity effects controlling litter decomposition rate and soil C storage.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Related Results

Home‐field advantages of litter decomposition increase with increasing N deposition rates: a litter and soil perspective
Home‐field advantages of litter decomposition increase with increasing N deposition rates: a litter and soil perspective
SummaryDifferences in litter quality and in soil microbial community composition can influence the litter decomposition and ‘home‐field advantage’ (HFA). However, our knowledge abo...
Higher Soil Mesofauna Abundance and Microbial Activities Drive Litter Decomposition in Subtropical Forests
Higher Soil Mesofauna Abundance and Microbial Activities Drive Litter Decomposition in Subtropical Forests
Soil fauna play an important role in litter decomposition and affect the “home-field advantage” (HFA) of litter decomposition. However, how this effect is modulated by the microenv...
Increased decomposition of root-derived biomass by warming in a temperate forest soil is depth-dependent
Increased decomposition of root-derived biomass by warming in a temperate forest soil is depth-dependent
Increased decomposition of root-derived biomass by warming in a temperate forest soil is depth-dependent Sun B, Zosso, C.U., Wiesenberg GLB, Pegoraro E., Torn MS, Schmidt ...
Nitrogen and Microelements Co-Drive the Decomposition of Typical Grass Litter in the Loess Plateau, China
Nitrogen and Microelements Co-Drive the Decomposition of Typical Grass Litter in the Loess Plateau, China
In grassland ecosystems, the decomposition of litter serves as a vital conduit for nutrient transfer between plants and soil. The aim of this study was to depict the dynamic proces...
Tree species richness affects litter production and decomposition rates in a tropical biodiversity experiment
Tree species richness affects litter production and decomposition rates in a tropical biodiversity experiment
We report data on leaf litter production and decomposition from a manipulative biodiversity experiment with trees in tropical Panama, which has been designed to explore the relatio...
Mixed-Species Plantation of Pinus massoniana Lamb. and Quercus variabilis Bl. and High Soil Nutrient Increase Litter Decomposition Rate
Mixed-Species Plantation of Pinus massoniana Lamb. and Quercus variabilis Bl. and High Soil Nutrient Increase Litter Decomposition Rate
Changes in land use and forest planting have led to substantial changes in soil fertility and leaf litter input. The effects of mixed planting on the leaf litter decomposition rate...
Mechanisms of soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands
Mechanisms of soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands
Abstract. We investigated the fate of root and litter derived carbon into soil organic matter and dissolved organic matter in soil profiles, in order to explain unexpected positive...

Back to Top