Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Epilogue

View through CrossRef
Did Alex Arnold kill Betty Gail Brown? I have been asked that question hundreds of times and have never found it easy to answer. My difficulty with the question began almost as soon as I saw Arnold for the first time, in a jail cell in Lexington two or three days after he had confessed to the killing and been charged with murder. Although Arnold was not at the time hallucinating about mind-reading machines or talking to creatures on the walls of his jail cell, he was quite obviously still suffering mental impairments. He had lost his access to alcohol a little more than a week earlier and had been sitting alone in jail for most of that period; he seemed to have passed through the worst of his withdrawal symptoms, but was not even close to a total escape from the consequences of at least ten years of drunkenness. He had lost the “good feelings” he gained from drinking (elevated mood, self-confidence, and nonexistent inhibitions) and had found in their place high anxiety, low energy, some disorientation, and a crystal-clear desire to be left alone. It was under these conditions, speaking very softly and seeming almost to be talking to himself, that he said, “I killed her.” Had he made this statement under normal circumstances, in a clean and clear state of mind, it would have been easy to believe that the state had found the killer of Betty Gail Brown. But the circumstances under which the statement was made were far from normal, although they were much closer to normal that those that prevailed a few days earlier when he signed the confession that led to his prosecution for murder....
University Press of Kentucky
Title: Epilogue
Description:
Did Alex Arnold kill Betty Gail Brown? I have been asked that question hundreds of times and have never found it easy to answer.
My difficulty with the question began almost as soon as I saw Arnold for the first time, in a jail cell in Lexington two or three days after he had confessed to the killing and been charged with murder.
Although Arnold was not at the time hallucinating about mind-reading machines or talking to creatures on the walls of his jail cell, he was quite obviously still suffering mental impairments.
He had lost his access to alcohol a little more than a week earlier and had been sitting alone in jail for most of that period; he seemed to have passed through the worst of his withdrawal symptoms, but was not even close to a total escape from the consequences of at least ten years of drunkenness.
He had lost the “good feelings” he gained from drinking (elevated mood, self-confidence, and nonexistent inhibitions) and had found in their place high anxiety, low energy, some disorientation, and a crystal-clear desire to be left alone.
It was under these conditions, speaking very softly and seeming almost to be talking to himself, that he said, “I killed her.
” Had he made this statement under normal circumstances, in a clean and clear state of mind, it would have been easy to believe that the state had found the killer of Betty Gail Brown.
But the circumstances under which the statement was made were far from normal, although they were much closer to normal that those that prevailed a few days earlier when he signed the confession that led to his prosecution for murder.

Related Results

Epilogue
Epilogue
This epilogue looks at the modern bureaucratic state. It considers what it means for a state's regulatory scheme to be comprised of such a range of free-roaming and diverse actors ...
Epilogue
Epilogue
The epilogue discusses the possibility of a true ‘aesthetics of place’. It shows that in some of the films of Chantal Akerman, Avi Mograbi (Part 1 & 2), the houses are not resi...
Epilogue: Epilog
Epilogue: Epilog
The Epilogue begins by describing the ambiguity of the meaning of human trafficking (HT) before offering a review of the 4P's that represent the primary responses to combatting HT....
Epilogue
Epilogue
The epilogue reviews the key passages in the history of economists’ ideas, discussions, and research on the measurability of utility between 1870 and 1985 and points to three main ...
Epilogue
Epilogue
AbstractThe epilogue discusses some of the most revealing findings in this book, ranging from spectacular sketches found underneath some of his most famous paintings to a surprisin...
Epilogue
Epilogue
Abstract The Epilogue quickly rehearses the major theses of the book. By exploring the practices of Clement’s exegesis, regardless of our estimation of the success o...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The epilogue demonstrates how the struggle for civil rights continued well beyond the 1970s. It also mentions how the crusade left a lasting impression on politics in the commonwea...
After Sovereignty?
After Sovereignty?
The book’s epilogue clarifies the theoretical and political concerns that motivated Catastrophic Historicism’s interventions into the fields of the theory of history and Puerto Ric...

Back to Top