Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Making No Compromise

View through CrossRef
This is the first book-length account of the lives and editorial careers of Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap, the women who founded the avant-garde journal the Little Review in Chicago in 1914. Born in the nineteenth-century Midwest, Anderson and Heap grew up to be iconoclastic rebels, living openly as lesbians, and advocating causes from anarchy to feminism and free love. Their lives and work shattered cultural, social, and sexual norms. As their paths crisscrossed Chicago, New York, Paris, and Europe; two World wars; and a parade of the most celebrated artists of their time, they transformed themselves and their journal into major forces for shifting perspectives on literature and art. Imagism, Dada, surrealism, and Machine Age aesthetics were among the radical trends the Little Review promoted and introduced to US audiences. Anderson and Heap published the early work of the “men of 1914”—Ezra Pound, James Joyce, William Butler Yeats, and T. S. Eliot—and promoted women writers such as Djuna Barnes, May Sinclair, Dorothy Richardson, Mina Loy, Mary Butts, and the inimitable Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven. In the mid-1920s, Anderson and Heap became adherents of George I. Gurdjieff, a Russian mystic, and in 1929 ceased publication of the Little Review. This book examines the roles of radical politics, sexuality, modernism, and spirituality and suggests that Anderson and Heap's interest in esoteric questions was evident from the early days of the Little Review. The book tells the story of two women who played an important role in shaping modernism.
Cornell University Press
Title: Making No Compromise
Description:
This is the first book-length account of the lives and editorial careers of Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap, the women who founded the avant-garde journal the Little Review in Chicago in 1914.
Born in the nineteenth-century Midwest, Anderson and Heap grew up to be iconoclastic rebels, living openly as lesbians, and advocating causes from anarchy to feminism and free love.
Their lives and work shattered cultural, social, and sexual norms.
As their paths crisscrossed Chicago, New York, Paris, and Europe; two World wars; and a parade of the most celebrated artists of their time, they transformed themselves and their journal into major forces for shifting perspectives on literature and art.
Imagism, Dada, surrealism, and Machine Age aesthetics were among the radical trends the Little Review promoted and introduced to US audiences.
Anderson and Heap published the early work of the “men of 1914”—Ezra Pound, James Joyce, William Butler Yeats, and T.
S.
Eliot—and promoted women writers such as Djuna Barnes, May Sinclair, Dorothy Richardson, Mina Loy, Mary Butts, and the inimitable Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven.
In the mid-1920s, Anderson and Heap became adherents of George I.
Gurdjieff, a Russian mystic, and in 1929 ceased publication of the Little Review.
This book examines the roles of radical politics, sexuality, modernism, and spirituality and suggests that Anderson and Heap's interest in esoteric questions was evident from the early days of the Little Review.
The book tells the story of two women who played an important role in shaping modernism.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
The co-existence of the compromise and reversed compromise effects
The co-existence of the compromise and reversed compromise effects
Abstract Three studies (n = 964, CloudResearch) are presented that clarify the conditions that determine the direction of the compromise effect in decisions under risk. Stu...
Compromise in Political Theory
Compromise in Political Theory
This review article provides a topic-centered overview of the state of compromise in political theory, where compromise is increasingly discussed as a promising approach to dealing...
Dynamic information aggregation decision-making methods based on variable precision rough set and grey clustering
Dynamic information aggregation decision-making methods based on variable precision rough set and grey clustering
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to construct a dynamic information aggregation decision-making model based on variable precision rough set. ...
Data-Driven Decision Making in the Community College Context
Data-Driven Decision Making in the Community College Context
This case study explored how data-driven decision making occurred within institutional planning activities at a California community college. The problem statement for this researc...
Doctrine ideas about law-making and its policy
Doctrine ideas about law-making and its policy
In the article, the author reveals the features of the current state of scientific understanding of the phenomenon of law-making. It was noted that law-making occupies a special pl...
Public and corporate norm-making as self-evident norm-making activities
Public and corporate norm-making as self-evident norm-making activities
For a long time, legal science considered public authorities as the only subject of norm-making activity. In particular, the subject of legal regulation of the Law of Ukraine «On L...
Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise
Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise
Does ongoing exposure to political violence prompt subject groups to support or oppose compromise in situations of intractable conflict? If so, what is the mechanism underlying the...

Back to Top