Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Spatial‐Mark‐Resight Model to Estimate Raccoon Abundance in Yosemite Valley, California

View through CrossRef
AbstractPrior to 2017 there was a lack of information regarding the abundance and density of raccoons (Procyon lotor) living in Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California. However, increased awareness of zoonotic disease raised concerns that human‐raccoon interactions in Yosemite Valley could pose a risk of disease transmission. Additionally, biologists needed to know if raccoons would threaten the success of an endangered species reintroduction program for the California red‐legged frog (Rana draytonii). Our project had several objectives: to obtain a population estimate of raccoons in the Yosemite Valley; to evaluate whether a zoonotic disease risk regardingBaylisascaris procyonisexisted; to learn more about the extent of raccoon nuisance behavior; and to consider the risk raccoons may pose to the conservation of the California red‐legged frog. We estimated a density of 1.89 (interquartile rate = 1.02–3.14) raccoons/km2and a population estimate of 40 individuals (SD ± 11.5), during Summer and Fall 2017. Three of 6 raccoons sampled showed evidence ofB. procyonisinfection, indicating a zoonotic risk for visitors to the park. There were 38 recorded incidents of raccoon nuisance behavior. Due to the low estimated raccoon density, we do not expect their presence to be a limiting factor for the California red‐legged frog reintroduction program; however, we do suggest that future release sites be located away from known raccoon use areas. We encourage continued attention to wildlife‐proof storage of food and garbage, visitor education regarding zoonotic disease risks, management actions aimed at ending anthropogenic feeding, and prompt clean‐up of latrine sites found near eating or play areas. © 2021 The Authors.Wildlife Society Bulletinpublished by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society.
Title: Spatial‐Mark‐Resight Model to Estimate Raccoon Abundance in Yosemite Valley, California
Description:
AbstractPrior to 2017 there was a lack of information regarding the abundance and density of raccoons (Procyon lotor) living in Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California.
However, increased awareness of zoonotic disease raised concerns that human‐raccoon interactions in Yosemite Valley could pose a risk of disease transmission.
Additionally, biologists needed to know if raccoons would threaten the success of an endangered species reintroduction program for the California red‐legged frog (Rana draytonii).
Our project had several objectives: to obtain a population estimate of raccoons in the Yosemite Valley; to evaluate whether a zoonotic disease risk regardingBaylisascaris procyonisexisted; to learn more about the extent of raccoon nuisance behavior; and to consider the risk raccoons may pose to the conservation of the California red‐legged frog.
We estimated a density of 1.
89 (interquartile rate = 1.
02–3.
14) raccoons/km2and a population estimate of 40 individuals (SD ± 11.
5), during Summer and Fall 2017.
Three of 6 raccoons sampled showed evidence ofB.
procyonisinfection, indicating a zoonotic risk for visitors to the park.
There were 38 recorded incidents of raccoon nuisance behavior.
Due to the low estimated raccoon density, we do not expect their presence to be a limiting factor for the California red‐legged frog reintroduction program; however, we do suggest that future release sites be located away from known raccoon use areas.
We encourage continued attention to wildlife‐proof storage of food and garbage, visitor education regarding zoonotic disease risks, management actions aimed at ending anthropogenic feeding, and prompt clean‐up of latrine sites found near eating or play areas.
© 2021 The Authors.
Wildlife Society Bulletinpublished by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society.

Related Results

Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
AbstractMonitoring big game populations is necessary for making well‐informed management decisions. In the eastern Sierra Nevada in California, USA, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)...
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
ABSTRACT Wildlife managers often need to estimate population abundance to make well‐informed decisions. However, obtaining such estimates can...
Camera traps and mark‐resight models: The value of ancillary data for evaluating assumptions
Camera traps and mark‐resight models: The value of ancillary data for evaluating assumptions
ABSTRACTUnbiased estimators of abundance and density are fundamental to the study of animal ecology and critical for making sound management decisions. Capture–recapture models are...
A spatial mark–resight model augmented with telemetry data
A spatial mark–resight model augmented with telemetry data
Abundance and population density are fundamental pieces of information for population ecology and species conservation, but they are difficult to estimate for rare and elusive spec...
The first report of Tritrichomonas foetus and Tetratrichomonas buttreyi in Raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in China
The first report of Tritrichomonas foetus and Tetratrichomonas buttreyi in Raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in China
Abstract Background In recent years, the trichomonosis in raccoon dogs in China had occurred frequently. Pentatrichomonas hominis had been described in raccoon dogs in Chin...
Use of capture–recapture models with mark‐resight data to estimate abundance of Aleutian cackling geese
Use of capture–recapture models with mark‐resight data to estimate abundance of Aleutian cackling geese
ABSTRACTThe Aleutian cackling goose (Branta hutchinsii leucopareia) was listed as endangered in 1967, downgraded to threatened in 1990, and removed from protection under the endang...
Generalized spatial mark–resight models with an application to grizzly bears
Generalized spatial mark–resight models with an application to grizzly bears
AbstractThe high cost associated with capture–recapture studies presents a major challenge when monitoring and managing wildlife populations. Recently developed spatial mark–resigh...

Back to Top