Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Incident reports involving hospital administrative staff: analysis of data from the Japan Council for Quality Healthcare nationwide database

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background: Task shifting and task sharing in healthcare are rapidly becoming more common as the shortage of physicians increases. However, research has not yet examined the changing roles of hospital administrative staff. This study clarified: (1) the adverse incidents caused by hospital administrative staff, and the direct and indirect impact of these incidents on patient care; and (2) the incidents that directly involved hospital administrative staff. Methods: This study used case report data from the Japan Council for Quality Healthcare collected from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2019, including a total of 30,823 reports. In April 2020, only the 88 self-reported incidents by hospital administrative staff were downloaded, excluding incidents reported by those in medical and co-medical occupations. Data from three reports implicating pharmacists were rejected and the quantitative and textual data from the remaining 85 case reports were analyzed in terms of whether they impacted patient care directly or indirectly.Results: Thirty-nine reports (45.9%) involved direct impact on patient care, while 46 (54.1%) involved indirect impact on patient care. Most incidents that directly impacted patient care involved administrative staff writing prescriptions on behalf of a doctor (n=24, 61.5%); followed by errors related to system administration, information, and documentation (n=7, 17.9%). Most reported errors that indirectly affected patient care were related to system administration, information, and documentation used by administrative staff (n=22, 47.8%), or to reception (n=9, 19.6%). Almost all errors occurred during weekdays. Most frequent incidents involved outpatients (n=23, 27.1%), or occurred next to examination/operation rooms (n=12, 14.1%). Further, a total of 14 cases (16.5%) involved patient misidentification. Conclusions: Incidents involving hospital administrative staff, the most common of which are medication errors from incorrect prescriptions, can lead to severe consequences for patients. Given that administrative staff now form a part of medical treatment teams, improvements in patient care may require further submission and review of incident reports involving administrative staff.
Title: Incident reports involving hospital administrative staff: analysis of data from the Japan Council for Quality Healthcare nationwide database
Description:
Abstract Background: Task shifting and task sharing in healthcare are rapidly becoming more common as the shortage of physicians increases.
However, research has not yet examined the changing roles of hospital administrative staff.
This study clarified: (1) the adverse incidents caused by hospital administrative staff, and the direct and indirect impact of these incidents on patient care; and (2) the incidents that directly involved hospital administrative staff.
Methods: This study used case report data from the Japan Council for Quality Healthcare collected from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2019, including a total of 30,823 reports.
In April 2020, only the 88 self-reported incidents by hospital administrative staff were downloaded, excluding incidents reported by those in medical and co-medical occupations.
Data from three reports implicating pharmacists were rejected and the quantitative and textual data from the remaining 85 case reports were analyzed in terms of whether they impacted patient care directly or indirectly.
Results: Thirty-nine reports (45.
9%) involved direct impact on patient care, while 46 (54.
1%) involved indirect impact on patient care.
Most incidents that directly impacted patient care involved administrative staff writing prescriptions on behalf of a doctor (n=24, 61.
5%); followed by errors related to system administration, information, and documentation (n=7, 17.
9%).
Most reported errors that indirectly affected patient care were related to system administration, information, and documentation used by administrative staff (n=22, 47.
8%), or to reception (n=9, 19.
6%).
Almost all errors occurred during weekdays.
Most frequent incidents involved outpatients (n=23, 27.
1%), or occurred next to examination/operation rooms (n=12, 14.
1%).
Further, a total of 14 cases (16.
5%) involved patient misidentification.
Conclusions: Incidents involving hospital administrative staff, the most common of which are medication errors from incorrect prescriptions, can lead to severe consequences for patients.
Given that administrative staff now form a part of medical treatment teams, improvements in patient care may require further submission and review of incident reports involving administrative staff.

Related Results

Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract Introduction Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
Zero to hero
Zero to hero
Western images of Japan tell a seemingly incongruous story of love, sex and marriage – one full of contradictions and conflicting moral codes. We sometimes hear intriguing stories ...

Back to Top