Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A case study of translator’s preface in Yok Edici

View through CrossRef
Translation and publication of foreign literature have at times resulted in obscenity court cases (e.g. the Aphrodite [1940] and Tropic of Cancer [1988] cases) against Turkish translators and publishers since the first decades of the Turkish Republic.  The recent obscenity court cases against the Turkish translators and publishers of William S. Burroughs’ The Soft Machine and Chuck Palahniuk’s Snuff (2011) were interpreted as instances of censorship. Taking this as a starting point, this article conducts a case study of Ahmet Ergenç’s translator’s preface for Exterminator!, a book by Burroughs which contains obscenity and was published in Turkey after the aforementioned court cases. The aims of this case study is to investigate the purpose of and reasons behind Ergenç’s preface and to determine whether Ergenç’s preface was influenced by the court cases and the censorial conditions under which Turkish translators work. To do so, Ergenç’s preface is studied in the light of Genette’s (1997) understanding of allographic and authorial prefaces and an interview is conducted with Ergenç. As a result, it is discussed that Ergenç aimed at informing readers unfamiliar with Burroughs about his style, which consists of fragmented narrative and obscene words, to prevent misinterpretations of them as translation mistakes on the part of the reader. As to the question of the influence of censorship on Ergenç’s preface, results of the analysis of the preface and the interview are conflicting. The article concludes that Ergenç denies any authorial responsibility for fragmentation and obscenity in Exterminator! and uses his preface to embrace invisibility as a translator while also gaining visibility at the same time through it.
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi
Title: A case study of translator’s preface in Yok Edici
Description:
Translation and publication of foreign literature have at times resulted in obscenity court cases (e.
g.
the Aphrodite [1940] and Tropic of Cancer [1988] cases) against Turkish translators and publishers since the first decades of the Turkish Republic.
  The recent obscenity court cases against the Turkish translators and publishers of William S.
Burroughs’ The Soft Machine and Chuck Palahniuk’s Snuff (2011) were interpreted as instances of censorship.
Taking this as a starting point, this article conducts a case study of Ahmet Ergenç’s translator’s preface for Exterminator!, a book by Burroughs which contains obscenity and was published in Turkey after the aforementioned court cases.
The aims of this case study is to investigate the purpose of and reasons behind Ergenç’s preface and to determine whether Ergenç’s preface was influenced by the court cases and the censorial conditions under which Turkish translators work.
To do so, Ergenç’s preface is studied in the light of Genette’s (1997) understanding of allographic and authorial prefaces and an interview is conducted with Ergenç.
As a result, it is discussed that Ergenç aimed at informing readers unfamiliar with Burroughs about his style, which consists of fragmented narrative and obscene words, to prevent misinterpretations of them as translation mistakes on the part of the reader.
As to the question of the influence of censorship on Ergenç’s preface, results of the analysis of the preface and the interview are conflicting.
The article concludes that Ergenç denies any authorial responsibility for fragmentation and obscenity in Exterminator! and uses his preface to embrace invisibility as a translator while also gaining visibility at the same time through it.

Related Results

ESKİ TÜRKÇEDE YOK, YOKSUZ, YOKSUZ BOL-, YOKSUZ KIL- ÜZERİNE
ESKİ TÜRKÇEDE YOK, YOKSUZ, YOKSUZ BOL-, YOKSUZ KIL- ÜZERİNE
Eski Türkçe devresinde isim cümlelerinin yokluk şekillerinde sıkça karşılaştığımız yok sözü bu devrede hiçbir bağa ihtiyaç duymadan yüklem olabildiği gibi yok+bol-, yok+er-, yok+kı...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Tõlkepoeetikast teksti ja keele taustal / On the Poetics of Translation
Tõlkepoeetikast teksti ja keele taustal / On the Poetics of Translation
Teesid: Artikkel käsitleb tõlkeprotsessi ilukirjandusliku teksti tõlkimisel, kus keeleline ja sotsiaalkultuuri­line informatsioon on allutatud kunstilisele struktuurile. Et tekst e...
Translation motivation and foreword by Charles Baudelaire "Edgar Poe, sa vie et ses œuvres" to the edition of E. A. Poe's texts
Translation motivation and foreword by Charles Baudelaire "Edgar Poe, sa vie et ses œuvres" to the edition of E. A. Poe's texts
Charles Baudelaire is primarily known as a French poet, the author of the internationally acclaimed poetry collection "Flowers of Evil" ("Les Fleurs du Mal"). However, he is also k...
Edward Hopper’ın Resimlerinde Yok-Yerler
Edward Hopper’ın Resimlerinde Yok-Yerler
Bu araştırmada geçiş, iletişim ve tüketim için geçici bir alan olan yok-yer kavramı Edward Hopper’ın resimlerinde mekân-insan ilişkisi bağlamında ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada Hopper r...
Tiny datablock in saving Hadoop distributed file system wasted memory
Tiny datablock in saving Hadoop distributed file system wasted memory
<p>Hadoop distributed file system (HDFS) is the file system whereby Hadoop is use it to store all the upcoming data inside it. Since it been declared, HDFS is consuming a hug...

Back to Top