Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

XXV. A Defence of the early Antiquity of the Bayeux Tapestry. By Thomas Amyot, Esq. F.S.A. in a Letter addressed to Henry Ellis, Esq. F.R.S. Secretary

View through CrossRef
In the observations which I addressed to you on the historical fact supposed to be established by the Bayeux Tapestry, I purposely abstained from investigating the age of that venerable and interesting relick. Such an attempt, indeed, would have been foreign to the object of my inquiry, believing as I then did, and as I still do, that, to whatever period this work may be ascribed, it cannot justly be considered as furnishing any evidence whatever of Harold's mission to the court of Normandy. But as the whole subject of the Tapestry is now fairly before us, most ably illustrated both by the pencil and the pen of Mr. Stothard, jun. I am tempted to avail myself of the opportunity thus afforded me of adverting to the question which has been so long at issue. This may perhaps seem the less necessary, when I profess myself to be abundantly satisfied with the proofs adduced by Mr. Stothard in support of the tradition which makes the Tapestry coeval with the events it celebrates.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: XXV. A Defence of the early Antiquity of the Bayeux Tapestry. By Thomas Amyot, Esq. F.S.A. in a Letter addressed to Henry Ellis, Esq. F.R.S. Secretary
Description:
In the observations which I addressed to you on the historical fact supposed to be established by the Bayeux Tapestry, I purposely abstained from investigating the age of that venerable and interesting relick.
Such an attempt, indeed, would have been foreign to the object of my inquiry, believing as I then did, and as I still do, that, to whatever period this work may be ascribed, it cannot justly be considered as furnishing any evidence whatever of Harold's mission to the court of Normandy.
But as the whole subject of the Tapestry is now fairly before us, most ably illustrated both by the pencil and the pen of Mr.
Stothard, jun.
I am tempted to avail myself of the opportunity thus afforded me of adverting to the question which has been so long at issue.
This may perhaps seem the less necessary, when I profess myself to be abundantly satisfied with the proofs adduced by Mr.
Stothard in support of the tradition which makes the Tapestry coeval with the events it celebrates.

Related Results

Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Since his death in 1922, Henry Lawson’s “spirit” has been kept alive by admirers across Australia. Over the last century, Lawson’s reputation in the academy has fluctuated yet fan ...
From Bath to Cambridge: The Early Life and Education of Robert Leslie Ellis
From Bath to Cambridge: The Early Life and Education of Robert Leslie Ellis
AbstractRobert Leslie Ellis was born in Bath on 25 August 1817. His father, Francis Ellis (1772–1842), had held a position in the Admiralty, but resigned when he became the princip...
XXIV. Some Observations on the Bayeux Tapestry. By Mr. Charles Stothard, in a Letter addressed to Samuel Lysons, Esq. V.P. F.R.S.
XXIV. Some Observations on the Bayeux Tapestry. By Mr. Charles Stothard, in a Letter addressed to Samuel Lysons, Esq. V.P. F.R.S.
On finishing and delivering to the Society of Antiquaries the Drawings which complete the series from the Bayeux Tapestry, I think it necessary to address you on the subject, for t...
Exploring State-Defence Industry Relations in Swedish Defence Policy, 2009–2022
Exploring State-Defence Industry Relations in Swedish Defence Policy, 2009–2022
The return to geopolitics in the formulation and execution of defence policy brings with it a need for the study of state-defence industry relations (SDIR) and insights into how go...

Back to Top