Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Centering Ability and Canal Transportation of TruNatomy Files with Different File Systems

View through CrossRef
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the centering ability and canal transportation of the ProTaper Next, One Curve, and TruNatomy instruments in curved root canals. Methods: Forty-five curved mesiobuccal canals of human mandibular molar teeth were selected, randomly divided into 3 groups, and prepared using the ProTaper Next, One Curve, and TruNatomy files. Cone Beam Computed Tomography images of the cross-sectional planes at 1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apical foramen were determined before and after the preparation. For each specified millimeter canal transportation and centering ability were measured. Statistical analysis was performed and compared all groups. Results: No significant differences were observed between the groups or root canal levels in both canal transportation and centering ability (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The TruNatomy system demonstrated comparable results with both predecessor ProTaper Next and One Curve single-file systems.
Title: Comparison of Centering Ability and Canal Transportation of TruNatomy Files with Different File Systems
Description:
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the centering ability and canal transportation of the ProTaper Next, One Curve, and TruNatomy instruments in curved root canals.
Methods: Forty-five curved mesiobuccal canals of human mandibular molar teeth were selected, randomly divided into 3 groups, and prepared using the ProTaper Next, One Curve, and TruNatomy files.
Cone Beam Computed Tomography images of the cross-sectional planes at 1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apical foramen were determined before and after the preparation.
For each specified millimeter canal transportation and centering ability were measured.
Statistical analysis was performed and compared all groups.
Results: No significant differences were observed between the groups or root canal levels in both canal transportation and centering ability (p > 0.
05).
Conclusion: The TruNatomy system demonstrated comparable results with both predecessor ProTaper Next and One Curve single-file systems.

Related Results

Test file
Test file
Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file....
Centering ability of waveone gold and protaper next rotary file systems in stimulated resin root canals
Centering ability of waveone gold and protaper next rotary file systems in stimulated resin root canals
Background: The combination of NiTi alloy with rotary instrument is a turning point in clinical endodontics that helps to keep the original shape of the canal, reduce the errors su...
Morpho-functionality of the toothed whale external ear canal
Morpho-functionality of the toothed whale external ear canal
While marine, anthropogenic noise pollution is a scientific and societal matter of concern, there is limited knowledge on how sea animals, particularly cetaceans, perceive their en...
Creating Secure File Systems in Open-Source Operating Systems
Creating Secure File Systems in Open-Source Operating Systems
The relevance of this study is determined by insecure data storage on personal computers, as it is the main operating system that performs authentication and file access control. B...
Pediatric Rotary Files: Evolution to Revolution
Pediatric Rotary Files: Evolution to Revolution
The main goal of pulp therapy in primary dentition is to preserve the primary tooth thus protecting future normal occlusion.  Routinely,  pulp  debridement  and  canal  shaping  ar...

Back to Top