Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Responsibility

View through CrossRef
To be responsible for something is to be answerable for it. We have prospective responsibilities, things it is up to us to attend to: these may attach to particular roles (the responsibilities of, for instance, parents or doctors), or be responsibilities we have as moral agents, or as human beings. We have retrospective responsibilities, for what we have done or failed to do, for the effects of our actions or omissions. Such responsibilities are often (but not always) moral or legal responsibilities. The scope of our retrospective moral responsibilities is controversial. We are responsible for the intended results of our actions, but how far we are responsible for their foreseen effects, or for harms that we do not prevent when we could, depends on how we should define our prospective responsibilities, that is, on how far we should regard such foreseen effects, or such preventable harms, as our business. To say that I am responsible for some foreseen effect, or for a harm which I did not prevent, is to say that I should have attended to that effect or to that harm in deciding how to act; our retrospective responsibilities are partly determined by our prospective responsibilities. I am responsible for something only if it is within my control. It is sometimes argued that I am therefore not responsible for that whose occurrence is a matter of luck; but it is not clear that we can or should try to make responsibility wholly independent of matters of luck. We have responsibilities not merely as individuals, but also as members of organizations (organizations themselves have responsibilities in so far as they can be seen as agents). This raises the question of how far we are responsible for the actions of groups or organizations to which we belong.
Title: Responsibility
Description:
To be responsible for something is to be answerable for it.
We have prospective responsibilities, things it is up to us to attend to: these may attach to particular roles (the responsibilities of, for instance, parents or doctors), or be responsibilities we have as moral agents, or as human beings.
We have retrospective responsibilities, for what we have done or failed to do, for the effects of our actions or omissions.
Such responsibilities are often (but not always) moral or legal responsibilities.
The scope of our retrospective moral responsibilities is controversial.
We are responsible for the intended results of our actions, but how far we are responsible for their foreseen effects, or for harms that we do not prevent when we could, depends on how we should define our prospective responsibilities, that is, on how far we should regard such foreseen effects, or such preventable harms, as our business.
To say that I am responsible for some foreseen effect, or for a harm which I did not prevent, is to say that I should have attended to that effect or to that harm in deciding how to act; our retrospective responsibilities are partly determined by our prospective responsibilities.
I am responsible for something only if it is within my control.
It is sometimes argued that I am therefore not responsible for that whose occurrence is a matter of luck; but it is not clear that we can or should try to make responsibility wholly independent of matters of luck.
We have responsibilities not merely as individuals, but also as members of organizations (organizations themselves have responsibilities in so far as they can be seen as agents).
This raises the question of how far we are responsible for the actions of groups or organizations to which we belong.

Related Results

Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
A theoretical responsibility and accountability framework for CSR and global responsibility
A theoretical responsibility and accountability framework for CSR and global responsibility
PurposeResponsibility and accountability are central to much of what managers do, but in the literature these complex social science concepts are confused. The paper aims to bring ...
Because Neglect Isn't Cute: Tuxedo Stan's Campaign for a Humane World
Because Neglect Isn't Cute: Tuxedo Stan's Campaign for a Humane World
On 10 September 2012, a cat named Tuxedo Stan launched his campaign for mayor of the Halifax Regional Municipality in Nova Scotia, Canada (“Tuxedo Stan for Mayor”). Backed by his h...
IMPACT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON THE CORPORATE BRAND OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED SERVICE BUSINESSES IN CAN THO CITY
IMPACT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON THE CORPORATE BRAND OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED SERVICE BUSINESSES IN CAN THO CITY
The study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the impact of corporate social responsibility on the brand image of small and medium-sized enterprises operating in the city of C...
Once again about Administrative Responsibility
Once again about Administrative Responsibility
The institution of administrative responsibility is one of the key ones in administrative law. However, in order for it to become so, it took quite a long time, the legal support ...
STRATEGIC ACCOUNTING AND ANALYSIS BY RESPONSIBILITY CENTER
STRATEGIC ACCOUNTING AND ANALYSIS BY RESPONSIBILITY CENTER
The scientific article presents the results of scientific research into the problems of organizing strategic accounting and analysis by responsibility centers, accounting, control ...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...

Back to Top