Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Role of Axial Stress in Pipeline Integrity Management

View through CrossRef
Abstract In pipeline integrity management, axial stress solely can be a detrimental condition, and it may play an important role in assessment of other threats. Current practice for the assessment of integrity features such as external metal loss, deformation and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) are based on methods validated by burst testing that primarily consider hoop stress to be the maximum principal stress which governs. Observations during recent integrity management practice, however, indicate that axial stress plays an important role in pipeline failures when interacting with integrity features under certain circumstances, and should be carefully considered in integrity engineering assessment. Multiple real-life case studies are described to illustrate the importance of proper consideration of axial stress in integrity management, including: 1) axial compressive stress induced global buckling, 2) yielding of small radius fitting under axial stress, 3) ductile overloading due to axial tensile stress interacting with circumferentially oriented corrosion feature, 4) axial tensile stress and its relationship with formation of circumferential stress corrosion cracking. The details of the case studies, results and findings are summarized in this paper. Determining axial stress for integrity assessment can be critical, depending on site-specific conditions and nature of the loading. In this paper, a multi-level method for calculating axial stress based on finite element analysis (FEA) using various elements and techniques, combined with bending strain measured by in-line inspection (ILI) is described. In addition, a simplified approach for interacting threat analysis with continuum FEA and a simplified assessment based on empirical equations are proposed and discussed.
Title: Role of Axial Stress in Pipeline Integrity Management
Description:
Abstract In pipeline integrity management, axial stress solely can be a detrimental condition, and it may play an important role in assessment of other threats.
Current practice for the assessment of integrity features such as external metal loss, deformation and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) are based on methods validated by burst testing that primarily consider hoop stress to be the maximum principal stress which governs.
Observations during recent integrity management practice, however, indicate that axial stress plays an important role in pipeline failures when interacting with integrity features under certain circumstances, and should be carefully considered in integrity engineering assessment.
Multiple real-life case studies are described to illustrate the importance of proper consideration of axial stress in integrity management, including: 1) axial compressive stress induced global buckling, 2) yielding of small radius fitting under axial stress, 3) ductile overloading due to axial tensile stress interacting with circumferentially oriented corrosion feature, 4) axial tensile stress and its relationship with formation of circumferential stress corrosion cracking.
The details of the case studies, results and findings are summarized in this paper.
Determining axial stress for integrity assessment can be critical, depending on site-specific conditions and nature of the loading.
In this paper, a multi-level method for calculating axial stress based on finite element analysis (FEA) using various elements and techniques, combined with bending strain measured by in-line inspection (ILI) is described.
In addition, a simplified approach for interacting threat analysis with continuum FEA and a simplified assessment based on empirical equations are proposed and discussed.

Related Results

Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Abstract The paper describes the installation analysis for the Matterhorn field pipeline replacement, located in water depths between 800-ft to 1200-ft in the Gul...
Developing guidelines for research institutions
Developing guidelines for research institutions
As introduced in Chapter 1, in this thesis, I developed guidelines to research institutions on how to foster research integrity. I did this by exploring how research institutions c...
Pipeline Resistance
Pipeline Resistance
Pipeline resistance is where an often abstract and wonky climate movement meets the bravery and boldness of Indigenous and other frontline defenders of land and water who inspire d...
A Fluid-pipe-soil Approach to Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines
A Fluid-pipe-soil Approach to Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines
Abstract The conventional approach to submarine pipeline stability design considers interactions between water and pipeline (fluid-pipe) and pipeline and seabed (...
Seismic Vulnerability of the Subsea Pipeline
Seismic Vulnerability of the Subsea Pipeline
Abstract Unburied marine pipeline vulnerability under seismic impact, a new approach of investigation, and conclusion / recommendations for certain analyzed cases...
Actualització consistent de bases de dades deductives
Actualització consistent de bases de dades deductives
En aquesta tesi, proposem un nou mètode per a l'actualització consistent de bases de dades deductives. Donada una petició d'actualització, aquest mètode tradueix de forma automàtic...
Stress Analysis of the Effect of Additional Load on the Butt Weld of Suspended Pipeline With Variable Wall Thickness
Stress Analysis of the Effect of Additional Load on the Butt Weld of Suspended Pipeline With Variable Wall Thickness
Under the special geological environment of the buried pipe, the ground is lost at the bottom of the pipe, which is created by various kinds of external factors. The pipe in the su...

Back to Top