Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Analysis of the National Energy Board Pipeline Integrity Performance Measures Data
View through CrossRef
The National Energy Board’s (NEB or the Board) top priorities are the safety of people and protection of the environment. NEB-regulated pipelines have a very good safety record; however, the NEB noticed an increased trend in some types of incidents. Therefore, after considerable stakeholder consultation, in March 2012 the NEB started requiring NEB-regulated companies to report annually on new pipeline performance measures. These performance measures were developed and introduced to promote continual improvement in the management of pipelines by allowing companies to compare their results with industry aggregate numbers. In addition, these metric results allow the NEB to both evaluate and demonstrate that pipeline companies are effective in managing pipeline safety and protection of the environment.
The NEB requires all regulated companies to report on incidents, such as releases of substances and serious injuries. Pipeline performance measures data provides the Board additional information such as lagging and leading indicators. These lagging indicators provide an historical view of company performance while the leading indicators provide forward looking data of potential future events. The NEB is of the view that an amalgamation of leading, lagging and qualitative measures can provide an overview of company effectiveness in meeting foundational management system program objectives.
This paper examines four years of reported integrity related performance and integrity inspection data to evaluate trends in activities taken by companies to maintain safe pipelines. This paper will briefly discuss the challenges encountered when developing the measures, obtaining consistent data and evaluation of the data to identify trends.
The paper will conclude by summarizing select results of the integrity performance measures and integrity inspection information data and discuss any potential future actions related to the pipeline performance integrity measures.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Title: Analysis of the National Energy Board Pipeline Integrity Performance Measures Data
Description:
The National Energy Board’s (NEB or the Board) top priorities are the safety of people and protection of the environment.
NEB-regulated pipelines have a very good safety record; however, the NEB noticed an increased trend in some types of incidents.
Therefore, after considerable stakeholder consultation, in March 2012 the NEB started requiring NEB-regulated companies to report annually on new pipeline performance measures.
These performance measures were developed and introduced to promote continual improvement in the management of pipelines by allowing companies to compare their results with industry aggregate numbers.
In addition, these metric results allow the NEB to both evaluate and demonstrate that pipeline companies are effective in managing pipeline safety and protection of the environment.
The NEB requires all regulated companies to report on incidents, such as releases of substances and serious injuries.
Pipeline performance measures data provides the Board additional information such as lagging and leading indicators.
These lagging indicators provide an historical view of company performance while the leading indicators provide forward looking data of potential future events.
The NEB is of the view that an amalgamation of leading, lagging and qualitative measures can provide an overview of company effectiveness in meeting foundational management system program objectives.
This paper examines four years of reported integrity related performance and integrity inspection data to evaluate trends in activities taken by companies to maintain safe pipelines.
This paper will briefly discuss the challenges encountered when developing the measures, obtaining consistent data and evaluation of the data to identify trends.
The paper will conclude by summarizing select results of the integrity performance measures and integrity inspection information data and discuss any potential future actions related to the pipeline performance integrity measures.
Related Results
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Abstract
The paper describes the installation analysis for the Matterhorn field pipeline replacement, located in water depths between 800-ft to 1200-ft in the Gul...
Developing guidelines for research institutions
Developing guidelines for research institutions
As introduced in Chapter 1, in this thesis, I developed guidelines to research institutions on how to foster research integrity. I did this by exploring how research institutions c...
Pipeline Resistance
Pipeline Resistance
Pipeline resistance is where an often abstract and wonky climate movement meets the bravery and boldness of Indigenous and other frontline defenders of land and water who inspire d...
A Fluid-pipe-soil Approach to Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines
A Fluid-pipe-soil Approach to Stability Design of Submarine Pipelines
Abstract
The conventional approach to submarine pipeline stability design considers interactions between water and pipeline (fluid-pipe) and pipeline and seabed (...
Seismic Vulnerability of the Subsea Pipeline
Seismic Vulnerability of the Subsea Pipeline
Abstract
Unburied marine pipeline vulnerability under seismic impact, a new approach of investigation, and conclusion / recommendations for certain analyzed cases...
Well Integrity Data Assessment WIDA Implementation through Integrating Established Well Data Systems to Increase Safe Operability for Wells with a History of Interdependence Integrity Issues
Well Integrity Data Assessment WIDA Implementation through Integrating Established Well Data Systems to Increase Safe Operability for Wells with a History of Interdependence Integrity Issues
Abstract
ADCO is accountable to operate a well stock with integrity, technical and operational challenges. It is the responsibility of ADCO to devise a system or met...
Critique of Offshore Pipelay Criteria and Its Effect on Pipeline Design
Critique of Offshore Pipelay Criteria and Its Effect on Pipeline Design
ABSTRACT
The pipelay criteria currently used for pipeline design is based mainly on submarine static pipelay analysis results. The criteria recommended in the cod...
Modified FMEA quality risk management technique for cross-country petroleum pipeline using GIS
Modified FMEA quality risk management technique for cross-country petroleum pipeline using GIS
PurposeThe aim of this study is to employ the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for risk management in cross-country pipelines, coupled with the utilization of Geographic Inf...

