Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The “logic” of diagrams in the Spherics of Theodosios

View through CrossRef
This paper provides a semiotic reading of the relationship between the text and the diagram in Theodosios’ Spherics , focusing on Sph. II.4 and II.5. This analysis provides a detailed explanation of what the inferences in the text imply for the mathematical objects and for the diagram, and argues that these are independent. It argues that the objects, and in particular the letters that name them, function in semiotically different ways in the text and in the diagram, but that the role of the objects in the text is meant to be mathematically and logically prior. It then argues that many places in which the diagram seems to contain information that is not included in the text are best explained by errors of the editing process or of the transmission; but that there do remain a few places that require direct inferences from the diagram.
Title: The “logic” of diagrams in the Spherics of Theodosios
Description:
This paper provides a semiotic reading of the relationship between the text and the diagram in Theodosios’ Spherics , focusing on Sph.
II.
4 and II.
5.
This analysis provides a detailed explanation of what the inferences in the text imply for the mathematical objects and for the diagram, and argues that these are independent.
It argues that the objects, and in particular the letters that name them, function in semiotically different ways in the text and in the diagram, but that the role of the objects in the text is meant to be mathematically and logically prior.
It then argues that many places in which the diagram seems to contain information that is not included in the text are best explained by errors of the editing process or of the transmission; but that there do remain a few places that require direct inferences from the diagram.

Related Results

The literary work of Theodosios of Hilandar: Chronological framework
The literary work of Theodosios of Hilandar: Chronological framework
The period in which Theodosios lived and worked has been one of the more controversial issues raised in the academic circles about this medieval author. Scientific opinions varied ...
The manuscript diagrams of Theodosios’ Spherics
The manuscript diagrams of Theodosios’ Spherics
This paper is a study of the visual characteristics of the medieval manuscript diagrams found in Theodosios’ Spherics. It provides a new taxonomy of eight types of diagrams found i...
Rationality and Logic
Rationality and Logic
An argument that logic is intrinsically psychological and human psychology is intrinsically logical, and that the connection between human rationality and logic is both constitutiv...
Greek and Roman Logic
Greek and Roman Logic
In ancient philosophy, there is no discipline called “logic” in the contemporary sense of “the study of formally valid arguments.” Rather, once a subfield of philosophy comes to be...
Drawing schematic diagrams
Drawing schematic diagrams
Schematic diagrams are invaluable in Earth Science in the communication of concepts in both publications and teaching. These diagrams can also be used during fieldwork to help deve...
Introduction
Introduction
This special issue moves beyond an understanding of diagrams as mere inscriptions of objects and processes, proposing instead to re-evaluate diagrammatic reasoning as the work that...
“We deny to the Jews and to the pagani, the right to practice legal advocacy and to serve in the state service.”
“We deny to the Jews and to the pagani, the right to practice legal advocacy and to serve in the state service.”
Competition between the empresses intensified. Eudokia’s uncle Asklepiodotos implemented a law protecting Jewish synagogues. Simeon the Stylite allegedly objected, Theodosios relen...
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
In the 1980s, Pollock’s work on default reasons started the quest in the AI community for a formal system of defeasible argumentation. The main goal of this paper is to provide a l...

Back to Top