Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Karl Barth and Comparative Theology
View through CrossRef
In a world in which interreligious engagement is both more dangerous and more imperative than ever, and in which the category of “religion” itself has come under increasing scrutiny, the discipline of comparative theology has reemerged as a fruitful strategy that enables one to avoid the most egregious problems of the category of “religion” and to foster encounter between different traditions with attention to particularity. At the same time, in the past few years, scholars of Karl Barth have begun to bring this major twentieth-century Protestant theologian into conversation with religious pluralism. This volume seeks to bring these two scholarly developments together. Featuring contributions from a variety of scholars including Francis Clooney, Mark Heim, Paul Knitter, Anantanand Rambachan, and Randi Rashkover, the volume builds on recent engagements with Barth in the area of theologies of religion and opens a new conversation between Barth’s theology and comparative theology. The opening essay summarizes the intra-Christian conversation about how Barth’s theology can helpfully inform theology of religious pluralism. The bulk of the volume that follows features comparative theological experiments, bringing Barth’s theology into conversation with theological claims from other religious traditions for the purpose of modeling deep learning across religious borders from a Barthian perspective. For each tradition addressed in this volume, two Barth-influenced theologians offer focused engagements of Barth with themes and figures from another religious tradition, with a response from a theologian from that tradition itself. Scant attention has been given to Barth as a conversation partner in the discipline of comparative theology, and we seek to open up new trajectories for comparative theology with this unlikely interlocutor.
Fordham University Press
Title: Karl Barth and Comparative Theology
Description:
In a world in which interreligious engagement is both more dangerous and more imperative than ever, and in which the category of “religion” itself has come under increasing scrutiny, the discipline of comparative theology has reemerged as a fruitful strategy that enables one to avoid the most egregious problems of the category of “religion” and to foster encounter between different traditions with attention to particularity.
At the same time, in the past few years, scholars of Karl Barth have begun to bring this major twentieth-century Protestant theologian into conversation with religious pluralism.
This volume seeks to bring these two scholarly developments together.
Featuring contributions from a variety of scholars including Francis Clooney, Mark Heim, Paul Knitter, Anantanand Rambachan, and Randi Rashkover, the volume builds on recent engagements with Barth in the area of theologies of religion and opens a new conversation between Barth’s theology and comparative theology.
The opening essay summarizes the intra-Christian conversation about how Barth’s theology can helpfully inform theology of religious pluralism.
The bulk of the volume that follows features comparative theological experiments, bringing Barth’s theology into conversation with theological claims from other religious traditions for the purpose of modeling deep learning across religious borders from a Barthian perspective.
For each tradition addressed in this volume, two Barth-influenced theologians offer focused engagements of Barth with themes and figures from another religious tradition, with a response from a theologian from that tradition itself.
Scant attention has been given to Barth as a conversation partner in the discipline of comparative theology, and we seek to open up new trajectories for comparative theology with this unlikely interlocutor.
Related Results
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
AbstractOliver Crisp argues that Karl Barth is incoherent on the question of universal salvation. Making use of a modal distinction between contingent and necessary universalism, C...
Exploring the Intersection
Exploring the Intersection
This study examines process theology from the perspective of Karl Barth’s theology, aiming to identify the similarities and differences between the two. A literature review was con...
Gereja sebagai Saksi Kristus di Ruang Publik
Gereja sebagai Saksi Kristus di Ruang Publik
Abstrak:
Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk membahas kontribusi Barth pada teologi publik. Tesis penulis adalah bahwa meskipun Barth tidak mengkonstruksi sebuah karya teologi publik ...
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
AbstractThis review examines twelve conservative evangelical responses to David Gibson and Daniel Strange's Engaging with Barth. Witten in a charitable spirit that gives deference ...
Barth and Roman Catholicism
Barth and Roman Catholicism
This chapter provides an interpretative lens for understanding Karl Barth’s dialogue with Roman Catholicism. The central argument is that Barth’s engagement with Roman Catholic the...
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
This concluding chapter to the collection of experiments with Karl Barth and comparative theology explores the two great moments in Barth’s relationship to religions: critique of a...
Barth’s Theology of Religion and Dōgen’s Nondualism
Barth’s Theology of Religion and Dōgen’s Nondualism
James Farwell begins by challenging the now-common classification of Barth’s theology of religions as “exclusivism,” calling his position rather a “kerygmatically generated inverse...

