Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract P2-12-05: Exploring the experience of relatives with whom genetic test results are communicated
View through CrossRef
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the psychosocial impact of genetic testing, both on the individual who has been tested and on family members who could benefit from knowing the test results. The responsibility for informing relatives of genetic test results falls on the proband, the first family member being tested. While there is limited data about the reaction of relatives with whom genetic test results are shared, there is some evidence that open, positive family relationships increase the likelihood of disclosure of test results while emotional distance, family conflict, and loss of contact decrease the likelihood of disclosure. We explored the communication process between probands undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1/2 and their first degree relatives with whom they shared results. Four hundred twenty two women were randomized to a communication skills-building intervention or a wellness control session. Overall, probands shared their test result with 80% of eligible relatives. As part of this study, relatives were surveyed by phone regarding factors associated with the communication process, and their ability to understand and cope with the information provided to them by the proband. This study focuses on 438 relatives (of 253 probands) who reported that test results were shared. The percent of relatives with whom genetic test results were shared did not differ by study group. However, there were significant differences across gender and generation. Female relatives were more likely to receive genetic test results (p = 0.0001), and adult children were more likely to receive genetic test results than either parents or siblings (p = 0.0006). Both positive and true negative test results were more likely to be communicated to relatives than indeterminate or inconclusive results. Comparing the actual test result of the proband with that reported by the relative, we found that 26% of relatives cited an incorrect test result, and this number did not differ by study group. Positive test results were the most likely to be correctly understood by the relatives (90%), while inconclusive test results were the least likely to be correctly understood (60%) (p = 0.005). When asked about their reaction to receipt of test results, 32% of relatives reported difficulty in understanding the test result, and 27% were upset with the information they received. Of those relatives whose proband received a positive test result, only 52% reported intention to pursue testing for themselves. Similarly, only 36% of relatives whose proband received true negative test results intended to pursue testing, implying the relatives did not fully understand the significance of these informative results for their own risk These findings indicate that sharing of genetic test results by probands to their adult first degree relatives is variable, that the information shared is often not well understood, and that there is significant distress associated with the sharing of test results on the part of the relatives. These findings suggest that relying on the probands to share their test results with their relatives is fraught with limitations which may compromise the value of the information for the relatives.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-12-05.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract P2-12-05: Exploring the experience of relatives with whom genetic test results are communicated
Description:
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the psychosocial impact of genetic testing, both on the individual who has been tested and on family members who could benefit from knowing the test results.
The responsibility for informing relatives of genetic test results falls on the proband, the first family member being tested.
While there is limited data about the reaction of relatives with whom genetic test results are shared, there is some evidence that open, positive family relationships increase the likelihood of disclosure of test results while emotional distance, family conflict, and loss of contact decrease the likelihood of disclosure.
We explored the communication process between probands undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1/2 and their first degree relatives with whom they shared results.
Four hundred twenty two women were randomized to a communication skills-building intervention or a wellness control session.
Overall, probands shared their test result with 80% of eligible relatives.
As part of this study, relatives were surveyed by phone regarding factors associated with the communication process, and their ability to understand and cope with the information provided to them by the proband.
This study focuses on 438 relatives (of 253 probands) who reported that test results were shared.
The percent of relatives with whom genetic test results were shared did not differ by study group.
However, there were significant differences across gender and generation.
Female relatives were more likely to receive genetic test results (p = 0.
0001), and adult children were more likely to receive genetic test results than either parents or siblings (p = 0.
0006).
Both positive and true negative test results were more likely to be communicated to relatives than indeterminate or inconclusive results.
Comparing the actual test result of the proband with that reported by the relative, we found that 26% of relatives cited an incorrect test result, and this number did not differ by study group.
Positive test results were the most likely to be correctly understood by the relatives (90%), while inconclusive test results were the least likely to be correctly understood (60%) (p = 0.
005).
When asked about their reaction to receipt of test results, 32% of relatives reported difficulty in understanding the test result, and 27% were upset with the information they received.
Of those relatives whose proband received a positive test result, only 52% reported intention to pursue testing for themselves.
Similarly, only 36% of relatives whose proband received true negative test results intended to pursue testing, implying the relatives did not fully understand the significance of these informative results for their own risk These findings indicate that sharing of genetic test results by probands to their adult first degree relatives is variable, that the information shared is often not well understood, and that there is significant distress associated with the sharing of test results on the part of the relatives.
These findings suggest that relying on the probands to share their test results with their relatives is fraught with limitations which may compromise the value of the information for the relatives.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-12-05.
Related Results
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
Standing next to but not being part of
Standing next to but not being part of
The overall aim of this thesis was to explore support for relatives from healthcare professionals, before and after a patient’s death, when general palliative care is provided at h...
Abstract 1003: Cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in Algerian population: pathways to precision medicine
Abstract 1003: Cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes in Algerian population: pathways to precision medicine
Background:
Cascade genetic testing helps to identify at risk relatives within hereditary cancer syndromes families with a known germline pathogenic variant in ca...
Neurocognitive Vulnerability Indicators in Psychosis
Neurocognitive Vulnerability Indicators in Psychosis
Background:Cognitive impairments are considered a component of the extended clinical syndrome of schizophrenia. the aim of the current project was to investigate putative cognitive...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
With Fearful Eyes: Exploring Relatives' Experiences With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
With Fearful Eyes: Exploring Relatives' Experiences With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Background
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) imposes significant consequences for a family, but little is known about relatives' experiences.
...
BIOMEDICAL ISSUES NECESSITATING LEGAL REGULATION OF GENETICS
BIOMEDICAL ISSUES NECESSITATING LEGAL REGULATION OF GENETICS
The article explores the various biomedical issues surrounding genetics that necessitate legal regulation. Genetics is a rapidly advancing field that holds immense potential for re...
Factors Affecting Collaboration of Intern Nurses With Patient Relatives in Psychiatry Clinic: A Qualitative Study
Factors Affecting Collaboration of Intern Nurses With Patient Relatives in Psychiatry Clinic: A Qualitative Study
ABSTRACTBackgroundPsychiatric nursing internship practice aims to deliver nursing care to the individual with a mental disorder and his/her family and to fulfil all steps of the nu...

