Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Geodetic Investigation of the 30 October 2020 Mw 6.9 Samos-Izmir Earthquake
View through CrossRef
<p>The earthquake with a magnitude of Mw 6.9 (according to Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute-KOERI) occurred 8 km north of Samos Island at a depth of 16 km, on 30.10.2020, at 11:51:24 UTC. It took place on the north-dipping normal fault zone of approximately 40 km length in the sea between Samos Island of Greece and Ku&#351;adas&#305; Bay of Turkey. After the mainshock, a tsunami with the height exceeding 1 meter occurred in Seferihisar region, south of Izmir, and north side of Samos Island. In this study, a geodetic investigation of the Samos-Izmir earthquake using GNSS and SAR techniques was carried out. Within the scope of this study, 1Hz observations of Turkey National Continuous GNSS Network-Active (TUSAGA-Aktif) stations in the earthquake zone, were used, and it was aimed to reveal the co-seismic deformation caused by the earthquake. In addition to GNSS data, the InSAR process has been performed by using ESA Sentinel-1 SAR data, and the vertical deformations were clarified with the unwrapped interferogram. The GNSS data were processed using web-based online processing services according to the relative and absolute positioning techniques as static and kinematic modes. In conclusion, considering the absolute and relative static processing of pre- and post-earthquake GNSS data, the maximum horizontal deformations were observed at CESM and IZMI GNSS stations located in the north of the fault. Due to the earthquake, these points moved to the north direction and the maximum horizontal deformations were found as 5.5 cm and 3.5 cm, respectively. According to the kinematic processing of the GNSS data, instantaneous horizontal movements of 12 cm and 4 cm towards the north were observed at the same stations, respectively, at the time of the earthquake. On the contrary, DIDI and AYD1 GNSS stations, which are located in the south of the fault, moved to the south-east direction and the magnitude of horizontal deformations were smaller. Considering the InSAR results, it was seen a 10 cm uplift in the west of the island of Samos and a 10 cm subsidence at the northernmost part. Besides this, a 5 cm subsidence was observed in Izmir territory, the north side of the fault, by means of the interferogram.</p>
Title: Geodetic Investigation of the 30 October 2020 Mw 6.9 Samos-Izmir Earthquake
Description:
<p>The earthquake with a magnitude of Mw 6.
9 (according to Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute-KOERI) occurred 8 km north of Samos Island at a depth of 16 km, on 30.
10.
2020, at 11:51:24 UTC.
It took place on the north-dipping normal fault zone of approximately 40 km length in the sea between Samos Island of Greece and Ku&#351;adas&#305; Bay of Turkey.
After the mainshock, a tsunami with the height exceeding 1 meter occurred in Seferihisar region, south of Izmir, and north side of Samos Island.
In this study, a geodetic investigation of the Samos-Izmir earthquake using GNSS and SAR techniques was carried out.
Within the scope of this study, 1Hz observations of Turkey National Continuous GNSS Network-Active (TUSAGA-Aktif) stations in the earthquake zone, were used, and it was aimed to reveal the co-seismic deformation caused by the earthquake.
In addition to GNSS data, the InSAR process has been performed by using ESA Sentinel-1 SAR data, and the vertical deformations were clarified with the unwrapped interferogram.
The GNSS data were processed using web-based online processing services according to the relative and absolute positioning techniques as static and kinematic modes.
In conclusion, considering the absolute and relative static processing of pre- and post-earthquake GNSS data, the maximum horizontal deformations were observed at CESM and IZMI GNSS stations located in the north of the fault.
Due to the earthquake, these points moved to the north direction and the maximum horizontal deformations were found as 5.
5 cm and 3.
5 cm, respectively.
According to the kinematic processing of the GNSS data, instantaneous horizontal movements of 12 cm and 4 cm towards the north were observed at the same stations, respectively, at the time of the earthquake.
On the contrary, DIDI and AYD1 GNSS stations, which are located in the south of the fault, moved to the south-east direction and the magnitude of horizontal deformations were smaller.
Considering the InSAR results, it was seen a 10 cm uplift in the west of the island of Samos and a 10 cm subsidence at the northernmost part.
Besides this, a 5 cm subsidence was observed in Izmir territory, the north side of the fault, by means of the interferogram.
</p>.
Related Results
The upper connected edge geodetic number of a graph
The upper connected edge geodetic number of a graph
For a non-trivial connected graph G, a set S ? V (G) is called an edge
geodetic set of G if every edge of G is contained in a geodesic joining some
pair of vertices in S. The...
1929 Dünya Ekonomik Krizi döneminde hukuki açıdan İzmir Limanı
1929 Dünya Ekonomik Krizi döneminde hukuki açıdan İzmir Limanı
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Atatürk Dönemi’nde İzmir Limanı’nın devlet idaresi altına alınmasında rol oynayan hukuki ve ekonomik etkenleri incelemek ve değerlendirmektir. Çalışmada ayrıca...
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Abstract – Objective: To analyze retrospectively 419 patients after the Wenchuan earthquake and 46 after Yushu earthquake with maxillofacial fractures so as to provide reference o...
Study the Geospace impact and the re-occurrence of pre-earthquake signals in the atmosphere: Preliminary analysis for the 2024 M 7.0 Cape Mendocino, CA and 2025 M 7.1 Southern Tibetan Plateau Earthquakes.
Study the Geospace impact and the re-occurrence of pre-earthquake signals in the atmosphere: Preliminary analysis for the 2024 M 7.0 Cape Mendocino, CA and 2025 M 7.1 Southern Tibetan Plateau Earthquakes.
This study explores the processes of generating pre-earthquake abnormalities in the atmosphere/ionosphere associated with significant seismicity. We analyzed two major earthquakes ...
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Tectonic earthquake swarms exhibit a distinct temporal and spatial pattern compared to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Unlike the latter ones, where the earthquake sequence typical...
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Abstract
Consulting the Catalogue of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), for the period 1904–2016 to detect the occurrence of potentially damaging earthquakes we ...
Effect of Qinghai Madoi MS7.4 earthquake on Coulomb stress and earthquake probability increment of adjacent faults
Effect of Qinghai Madoi MS7.4 earthquake on Coulomb stress and earthquake probability increment of adjacent faults
On May 22, 2021, a MS7.4 earthquake occurred in Madoi County, Guoluo Prefecture, Qinghai Province. The epicenter was located at 98.34°E and 34.59°N (Officially de...
Pattern of strong earthquakes
Pattern of strong earthquakes
Abstract
The idea that one earthquake is associated with the occurrence of another earthquake is not new. In this study, we focus our attention on the relationships between...

