Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

MB1–MB2 Canal Orifice Distance in Maxillary First and Second Molars:

View through CrossRef
Aim: To evaluate the distance between the mesiobuccal canal orifices (MB1 and MB2) in maxillary first and second molars in a Rajasthan population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: CBCT scans of maxillary first and second molars were evaluated in the axial plane at the level of the pulpal floor. The linear distance between the centers of the MB1 and MB2 canal orifices was measured using dedicated CBCT software. Measurements were statistically analyzed and comparisons were made between first and second molars and between genders. Results: The mean MB1–MB2 distance was 1.58 ± 0.72 mm in maxillary first molars and 1.97 ± 0.74 mm in maxillary second molars. The difference between first and second molars was statistically significant (p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between males and females (p = 0.923). Conclusion: Knowledge of MB1–MB2 inter-orifice distances in maxillary molars may assist clinicians in more predictable location of the MB2 canal and improve endodontic treatment outcomes.  
Title: MB1–MB2 Canal Orifice Distance in Maxillary First and Second Molars:
Description:
Aim: To evaluate the distance between the mesiobuccal canal orifices (MB1 and MB2) in maxillary first and second molars in a Rajasthan population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods: CBCT scans of maxillary first and second molars were evaluated in the axial plane at the level of the pulpal floor.
The linear distance between the centers of the MB1 and MB2 canal orifices was measured using dedicated CBCT software.
Measurements were statistically analyzed and comparisons were made between first and second molars and between genders.
Results: The mean MB1–MB2 distance was 1.
58 ± 0.
72 mm in maxillary first molars and 1.
97 ± 0.
74 mm in maxillary second molars.
The difference between first and second molars was statistically significant (p = 0.
001).
No statistically significant difference was observed between males and females (p = 0.
923).
Conclusion: Knowledge of MB1–MB2 inter-orifice distances in maxillary molars may assist clinicians in more predictable location of the MB2 canal and improve endodontic treatment outcomes.
 .

Related Results

Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction based on assay for subforms of creatine kinase-MB.
Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction based on assay for subforms of creatine kinase-MB.
Thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has produced the need for an accurate early diagnostic marker. We previously developed and assessed an assa...
The Examination of Root Morphology of the Maxillary First and Second Molars Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
The Examination of Root Morphology of the Maxillary First and Second Molars Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Introduction: Maxillary molars usually have three roots, four canals and the extra canal often exists in the mesiobuccal root. This study aimed to investigate the root morphology o...
Creatine kinase MB isoforms: sensitive markers of ischemic myocardial damage
Creatine kinase MB isoforms: sensitive markers of ischemic myocardial damage
Abstract We investigated the use of creatine kinase (CK) MB isoforms as a marker of myocardial cell injury in a preliminary study of 16 patients with chronic stable ...
Maxillary first molar agenesis and other dental anomalies
Maxillary first molar agenesis and other dental anomalies
Abstract Objective: To explore the association of maxillary first molar agenesis with other dental anomalies in Japanese orthodontic patients. ...
Assessment of the Relationship between Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Maxillary Sinus Using Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography
Assessment of the Relationship between Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Maxillary Sinus Using Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography
Introduction . Because of the close contact between maxillary sinus and maxillary posterior teeth, procedural errors such as perforation of the sinus may occur ...
C-shaped Canal System in Maxillary Molars Evaluated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in an Argentine subpopulation
C-shaped Canal System in Maxillary Molars Evaluated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in an Argentine subpopulation
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presence of maxillary first and second molars with a C-shaped canal system in an Argentine subpopulation, and to classify them. Mat...
Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the root canal morphology of primary molars
Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the root canal morphology of primary molars
Abstract Background: This study aimed to assess the root canal morphology of primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: This cross-sectional study ...

Back to Top