Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

La Doctrina de la Creación del Mundo en Algazel / The Doctrine of the Creation of the World in Algazel

View through CrossRef
Algazel considered dangerous the doctrine of the eternity of the world such as it was defended by the philosopheres, as well as harmfull for the islamic religion and even the drowning of the Islam. That is why he refuted it to a great extent in his book Tahâfut al-falâsifa. In his opinion the idea of an eternal creation is both absurd and contradictory.His Tahâfut gathers as many arguments as he could find to prove that God created the world along the time and that the philosophers denied in fact the divine creation. This proof does not take place in the Tahâfut, where the persian theologe just insists on the meakness of the proof of the philosophers and the inconsistency thereof. He does it in others works such as the Ihyâ, where he proves the existence of God by the creation of the world along the time. This is the endavour of the present article, which intends to bring us near his true doctrine about the origin of the world. At the same time, the persian theologue does not neglect the fierce criticisme to the statement of the philosophers about an eternal world.
Title: La Doctrina de la Creación del Mundo en Algazel / The Doctrine of the Creation of the World in Algazel
Description:
Algazel considered dangerous the doctrine of the eternity of the world such as it was defended by the philosopheres, as well as harmfull for the islamic religion and even the drowning of the Islam.
That is why he refuted it to a great extent in his book Tahâfut al-falâsifa.
In his opinion the idea of an eternal creation is both absurd and contradictory.
His Tahâfut gathers as many arguments as he could find to prove that God created the world along the time and that the philosophers denied in fact the divine creation.
This proof does not take place in the Tahâfut, where the persian theologe just insists on the meakness of the proof of the philosophers and the inconsistency thereof.
He does it in others works such as the Ihyâ, where he proves the existence of God by the creation of the world along the time.
This is the endavour of the present article, which intends to bring us near his true doctrine about the origin of the world.
At the same time, the persian theologue does not neglect the fierce criticisme to the statement of the philosophers about an eternal world.

Related Results

Artistic Invention as Tradition in the Portrait Painting of Late-Colonial Lima
Artistic Invention as Tradition in the Portrait Painting of Late-Colonial Lima
José Joaquín Bermejo, Cristóbal de Aguilar, Cristóbal de Lozano y Pedro Díaz no son nombres muy conocidos fuera del Perú. Sin embargo, estos artistas son algunos de los pintores má...
Book reviews - Crítica de libros - Crítica de livros (Historia Agraria, 76)
Book reviews - Crítica de libros - Crítica de livros (Historia Agraria, 76)
Book reviews - Crítica de libros - Crítica de livros Niek Koning. Food Security, Agricultural Policies and Economic Growth: Longterm. Dynamics in the Past, Present and Future. Lond...
On the distinction between creation and conservation: a partial defence of continuous creation
On the distinction between creation and conservation: a partial defence of continuous creation
AbstractThe traditional view of divine conservation holds that it is simply a continuation of the initial act of creation. In this essay, I defend the continuous-creation tradition...
Malthus, Jesus, and Darwin
Malthus, Jesus, and Darwin
Malthus' theological ideas were most clearly presented in the final two chapters of the first edition (1798) of his Essay on the Principle of Population. They can be classified und...
El eclipse del trabajo y los riesgos para la democracia y la constitución republicana
El eclipse del trabajo y los riesgos para la democracia y la constitución republicana
Este trabajo es una defensa, desde la perspectiva de un sindicalista, del constitucionalismo de signo ferrajoliano en relación con los derechos sociales en general y los derechos d...
Sobre el riesgo de confundir el lenguaje cósmico de Kandinsky con el lenguaje divino del obispo Berkeley
Sobre el riesgo de confundir el lenguaje cósmico de Kandinsky con el lenguaje divino del obispo Berkeley
Según Philippe Sers, Wassily Kandinsky y George Berkeley coincidieron al contemplar el mundo como un lenguaje que nos habla de lo espiritual que hay en el fondo del alma humana. Si...

Back to Top