Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES IN MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURE MANAGEMENT RECONSTRUCTION PLATES VERSUS DUAL MINIPLATES FIXATION

View through CrossRef
Background and aims: The angle created by the positioning of the ramus and mandibular body is known as the mandibular angle.  An angle fracture is characterized by a triangular region that is enclosed by the masseter muscle's anterior border and an oblique line that runs from the mandibular third molar region to the masseter muscle's posterior inferior attachment.  This study examined the results and side effects of utilizing reconstruction plates against double miniplate fixation for treating mandibular angle fractures. Materials and methods: The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Military Hospital in Sana'a, Yemen, carried out the study between 2020 and 2024, diagnosing mandibular angle fractures in two equal groups. Reconstruction plates were used for 20 patients in Group A, and double miniplate fixation was used for another 20 patients in Group B. Following surgery, the two groups had radiographic and clinical evaluations for mandibular deviation, hematoma, infection, limited mouth opening, surgical site edema, plate exposure, plate stability, and malocclusion.  Results: The study found that 15% of patients treated with reconstruction plates experienced bone exposure, 10% experienced impaired stability, 30% reported plate-site edema, and 15% reported nerve injury, compared to the 10% treated with two miniplates. The study found that the use of two miniplates was better at reducing deviation opening in patients treated with two miniplates, with a difference of 15% and a p-value of 0.07. Conclusion: The study found that fixation using two miniplates is the most effective and reliable treatment strategy for mandibular angle fractures, with lower complication rates and minimal infection rates. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal approach for fixing these fractures.                   Peer Review History: Received 7 April 2025;   Reviewed 10 May 2025; Accepted 21 June; Available online 15 July 2025 Academic Editor: Dr. Amany Mohamed Alboghdadly, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, amanyalboghdadly@gmail.com  Reviewers: Dr. A.A. Mgbahurike, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria, amaka_mgbahurike@yahoo.com Dr. Adebayo Gege Grace Iyabo, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, funbimbola@gmail.com
Title: COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES IN MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURE MANAGEMENT RECONSTRUCTION PLATES VERSUS DUAL MINIPLATES FIXATION
Description:
Background and aims: The angle created by the positioning of the ramus and mandibular body is known as the mandibular angle.
  An angle fracture is characterized by a triangular region that is enclosed by the masseter muscle's anterior border and an oblique line that runs from the mandibular third molar region to the masseter muscle's posterior inferior attachment.
  This study examined the results and side effects of utilizing reconstruction plates against double miniplate fixation for treating mandibular angle fractures.
Materials and methods: The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Military Hospital in Sana'a, Yemen, carried out the study between 2020 and 2024, diagnosing mandibular angle fractures in two equal groups.
Reconstruction plates were used for 20 patients in Group A, and double miniplate fixation was used for another 20 patients in Group B.
Following surgery, the two groups had radiographic and clinical evaluations for mandibular deviation, hematoma, infection, limited mouth opening, surgical site edema, plate exposure, plate stability, and malocclusion.
 Results: The study found that 15% of patients treated with reconstruction plates experienced bone exposure, 10% experienced impaired stability, 30% reported plate-site edema, and 15% reported nerve injury, compared to the 10% treated with two miniplates.
The study found that the use of two miniplates was better at reducing deviation opening in patients treated with two miniplates, with a difference of 15% and a p-value of 0.
07.
Conclusion: The study found that fixation using two miniplates is the most effective and reliable treatment strategy for mandibular angle fractures, with lower complication rates and minimal infection rates.
Further studies are needed to determine the optimal approach for fixing these fractures.
                  Peer Review History: Received 7 April 2025;   Reviewed 10 May 2025; Accepted 21 June; Available online 15 July 2025 Academic Editor: Dr.
Amany Mohamed Alboghdadly, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, amanyalboghdadly@gmail.
com  Reviewers: Dr.
A.
A.
Mgbahurike, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria, amaka_mgbahurike@yahoo.
com Dr.
Adebayo Gege Grace Iyabo, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, funbimbola@gmail.
com.

Related Results

Comparison of Outcome of Conventional Miniplates Versus 3-D Miniplates for Reduction of Mandibular Fractures
Comparison of Outcome of Conventional Miniplates Versus 3-D Miniplates for Reduction of Mandibular Fractures
Background: Mandibular fracture, also known as fracture of the jaw, is a sudden discontinuity through the mandibular bone. In the treatment of un-favorable mandibular angle fractur...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Fracture Modelling Using Seismic Based Fracture Intensity Volume, a Case Study in Middle East
Fracture Modelling Using Seismic Based Fracture Intensity Volume, a Case Study in Middle East
Abstract In this paper, a case study in a fractured carbonate reservoir is presented to demonstrate the approach of fracture modeling using fracture intensity vol...
Impact of mandibular third molars on angle fractures: A retrospective study
Impact of mandibular third molars on angle fractures: A retrospective study
AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies have shown that the position and presence of mandibular third molars is associated with a high risk of mandibular angle fractures. The aim of thi...
Locking Versus Non-Locking Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures in Above 35 Years Age Patients
Locking Versus Non-Locking Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures in Above 35 Years Age Patients
Objective: To compare the frequency of short term post-operative infection of locking plates versus non-locking plate in mandibular fractures in patients above 35 years of age. Met...
Quantifying the Sensitivity of Dielectric Dispersion Data to Fracture Properties in Fractured Rocks
Quantifying the Sensitivity of Dielectric Dispersion Data to Fracture Properties in Fractured Rocks
Evaluation of fluid storage and flow capacity of a fractured rock system needs a comprehensive characterization of all the fracture properties. These properties include the fractur...
The Pierre Robin Mandible is Hypoplastic and Morphologically Abnormal
The Pierre Robin Mandible is Hypoplastic and Morphologically Abnormal
Background: For Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) patients, there is incomplete characterization of 3D differences and effects of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) on...
Osteometric Measures of Mandible on Its Various Aspects in South Indian Dry Skull
Osteometric Measures of Mandible on Its Various Aspects in South Indian Dry Skull
Introduction: Mandible is the single bone articulated with cranium forming a temporomandibular joint and it contributes to the lower jaw containing teeth. The mandible is composed ...

Back to Top