Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Catchment characterization: current descriptors, knowledge gaps and future opportunities
View through CrossRef
An ability to describe hydrologically relevant differences between places is at the core of our science. A common way to characterize hydrological catchments is to use descriptors that summarize important physical aspects of the system, often by aggregating heterogeneous geospatial data into a single number. Such descriptors aim to capture various facets of catchment functioning and structure, identify similarity or dissimilarity, and transfer information among them. However, so far there is no agreement on how catchment descriptors should be selected, aggregated and evaluated. Even worse, little is known about the existence of potential biases in the current practices to characterize catchments. In this systematic review, we analyze 742 research articles published between 1967 and 2021 to provide a categorized overview of current and historical practices of catchment characterization (i.e., data sources, aggregation and evaluation methods) in hydrological science and related disciplines. We uncover the existence of substantial biases in catchment characterization: (1) only 16% of the analyzed studies are in dry environments, even though such environments cover 42% of global land surface; (2) only 30% of studies use subsurface features for catchment characterization; (3) only 4% and 9% of descriptors are aggregated in spatially- and vertically-differentiated way respectively, while the absolute majority of descriptors are simple averages and do not account for hydrologically-relevant variabilities of features within catchments; (4) 25% of analyzed studies do not evaluate the usefulness and none of the analyzed studies quantify the uncertainties of catchment descriptors. We demonstrate the potential effects of these biases on our ability to effectively characterize catchments and identify functional similarity of catchment behavior with illustrative examples. Finally, we suggest possible ways to derive more robust, comprehensive and hydrologically meaningful catchment descriptors.
California Digital Library (CDL)
Title: Catchment characterization: current descriptors, knowledge gaps and future opportunities
Description:
An ability to describe hydrologically relevant differences between places is at the core of our science.
A common way to characterize hydrological catchments is to use descriptors that summarize important physical aspects of the system, often by aggregating heterogeneous geospatial data into a single number.
Such descriptors aim to capture various facets of catchment functioning and structure, identify similarity or dissimilarity, and transfer information among them.
However, so far there is no agreement on how catchment descriptors should be selected, aggregated and evaluated.
Even worse, little is known about the existence of potential biases in the current practices to characterize catchments.
In this systematic review, we analyze 742 research articles published between 1967 and 2021 to provide a categorized overview of current and historical practices of catchment characterization (i.
e.
, data sources, aggregation and evaluation methods) in hydrological science and related disciplines.
We uncover the existence of substantial biases in catchment characterization: (1) only 16% of the analyzed studies are in dry environments, even though such environments cover 42% of global land surface; (2) only 30% of studies use subsurface features for catchment characterization; (3) only 4% and 9% of descriptors are aggregated in spatially- and vertically-differentiated way respectively, while the absolute majority of descriptors are simple averages and do not account for hydrologically-relevant variabilities of features within catchments; (4) 25% of analyzed studies do not evaluate the usefulness and none of the analyzed studies quantify the uncertainties of catchment descriptors.
We demonstrate the potential effects of these biases on our ability to effectively characterize catchments and identify functional similarity of catchment behavior with illustrative examples.
Finally, we suggest possible ways to derive more robust, comprehensive and hydrologically meaningful catchment descriptors.
Related Results
Current practices in catchment characterization: data sources, aggregation approaches, derived descriptors and their value
Current practices in catchment characterization: data sources, aggregation approaches, derived descriptors and their value
<p>A common way to characterize catchments is to use catchment descriptors that summarize important physical aspects of a given catchment, often by aggregating large ...
Characterizing Groundwater Quality, Recharge and Distribution under Anthropogenic conditions
Characterizing Groundwater Quality, Recharge and Distribution under Anthropogenic conditions
Awareness concerning sustainable groundwater management is gaining traction and calls for adequate understanding of the complexities of natural and anthropogenic processes and how ...
Improving and parameterising nitrogen and phosphorus modelling for application of LUCI in New Zealand
Improving and parameterising nitrogen and phosphorus modelling for application of LUCI in New Zealand
<p>Over the last 50 years freshwater and marine environments have become severely impaired due to contamination from pathogens, heavy metals, sediment, industrial chemicals a...
Understanding heat exposure through morphological descriptors of intra-urban heterogeneity
Understanding heat exposure through morphological descriptors of intra-urban heterogeneity
Thermal variability in urban environments significantly influences heat exposure patterns and the selection of climate adaptation measures. Different morphological descriptors are ...
Geo-informatics based Morphometric Analysis of a Reservoir Catchment in Shivalik Foothills of North-West India
Geo-informatics based Morphometric Analysis of a Reservoir Catchment in Shivalik Foothills of North-West India
The present study examined 35 morphometric parameters related to stream/drainage network, catchment geometry, and relief aspects for hydrological characterization of the Thana Dam ...
Soil Erodibility Analysis and Mapping in Gilgel Gibe-I Catchment, Omo-Gibe River Basin, Ethiopia
Soil Erodibility Analysis and Mapping in Gilgel Gibe-I Catchment, Omo-Gibe River Basin, Ethiopia
The soil erosion factor, erodibility, measures the susceptibility of soil particles to transport and detachment by erosive agents. Soil erosion and sedimentation models use soil pr...
Catchment vegetation and erosion controls soil carbon cycling in SE Australia during two Glacial-Interglacial complexes
Catchment vegetation and erosion controls soil carbon cycling in SE Australia during two Glacial-Interglacial complexes
<p>Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) represents with up to 80% the largest part of the terrestrial&#8217;s carbon pool. However, it is still highly debated if soil-ca...
Chemical bond overlap descriptors from multiconfiguration wavefunctions
Chemical bond overlap descriptors from multiconfiguration wavefunctions
Chemical bonds are fundamental in chemistry, serving as the foundation for understanding molecular properties. Over time, various theories and descriptors have evolved to character...

