Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing?
View through CrossRef
Context Goals set by countries and corporate entities in response to the Paris climate agreement (COP21) have put a focus on livestock producers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe). However, methods to reduce emissions in livestock enterprises are limited. One option to reduce the balance of GHGe produced on farms is to sequester carbon in soils and trees within the farm boundary. Aims To assess the effectiveness of carbon sequestration in maintaining net zero emissions on a grazing enterprise (Jigsaw Farms). A previous study indicated that a single property in this enterprise (Hensley Park) achieved net zero status in 2014. Methods Net emissions produced by the enterprise across two properties (Melville Forrest and Hensley Park) were estimated by calculating on-farm and pre-farm emissions, using the IPCC-approved method, SB-GAFv2.3, FullCAM, and soil data provided by Jigsaw Farms. Emissions and vegetation sequestration results were validated through field data and farm records. Key results From 2010 to 2014, Jigsaw Farm’s Hensley Park property sequestered more carbon in trees and soils than the equivalent GHGe produced. Trees, on average, provided 89% of the sequestration and soils provided 11%. After this, an increase in GHGe from higher animal numbers and declining sequestration rates meant the enterprise was no longer net zero. Emissions in 2021 were 10,870 t carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-e), while vegetation sequestered 6704 t CO2-e. Data was insufficient to assess soil carbon sequestration. Although net emissions increased, the emissions intensity of products was halved due to sequestration. Conclusions Although increased woody vegetation on-farm enabled achievement of net zero emissions, maintaining this position using only sequestration has proven challenging. Other on-farm benefits of trees and shrubs, such as shade and shelter for animals from climatic extremes, conservation and aesthetic benefits, are important in decisions to integrate trees. Implications The level of emission reduction achieved by trees can be increased, and the period of emissions reduction extended, by expanding tree plantings, staging plantings over time, using faster-growing species or, in the longer term, harvesting trees for timber and accounting for carbon stored in long-lived products. However, relying on sequestration alone cannot indefinitely meet net zero emission objectives.
CSIRO Publishing
Title: Can soil and tree carbon sequestration maintain zero net emissions grazing?
Description:
Context Goals set by countries and corporate entities in response to the Paris climate agreement (COP21) have put a focus on livestock producers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe).
However, methods to reduce emissions in livestock enterprises are limited.
One option to reduce the balance of GHGe produced on farms is to sequester carbon in soils and trees within the farm boundary.
Aims To assess the effectiveness of carbon sequestration in maintaining net zero emissions on a grazing enterprise (Jigsaw Farms).
A previous study indicated that a single property in this enterprise (Hensley Park) achieved net zero status in 2014.
Methods Net emissions produced by the enterprise across two properties (Melville Forrest and Hensley Park) were estimated by calculating on-farm and pre-farm emissions, using the IPCC-approved method, SB-GAFv2.
3, FullCAM, and soil data provided by Jigsaw Farms.
Emissions and vegetation sequestration results were validated through field data and farm records.
Key results From 2010 to 2014, Jigsaw Farm’s Hensley Park property sequestered more carbon in trees and soils than the equivalent GHGe produced.
Trees, on average, provided 89% of the sequestration and soils provided 11%.
After this, an increase in GHGe from higher animal numbers and declining sequestration rates meant the enterprise was no longer net zero.
Emissions in 2021 were 10,870 t carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-e), while vegetation sequestered 6704 t CO2-e.
Data was insufficient to assess soil carbon sequestration.
Although net emissions increased, the emissions intensity of products was halved due to sequestration.
Conclusions Although increased woody vegetation on-farm enabled achievement of net zero emissions, maintaining this position using only sequestration has proven challenging.
Other on-farm benefits of trees and shrubs, such as shade and shelter for animals from climatic extremes, conservation and aesthetic benefits, are important in decisions to integrate trees.
Implications The level of emission reduction achieved by trees can be increased, and the period of emissions reduction extended, by expanding tree plantings, staging plantings over time, using faster-growing species or, in the longer term, harvesting trees for timber and accounting for carbon stored in long-lived products.
However, relying on sequestration alone cannot indefinitely meet net zero emission objectives.
Related Results
Carbon Sequestration and Soil Restoration Potential of Grazing Lands under Exclosure Management in a Semi-Arid Environment of Northern Ethiopia
Carbon Sequestration and Soil Restoration Potential of Grazing Lands under Exclosure Management in a Semi-Arid Environment of Northern Ethiopia
Exclosures are used to regenerate native vegetation as a way to reduce soil erosion, increase rain water infiltration and provide fodder and woody biomass in degraded grazing lands....
Recent Legal Developments in Carbon Sequestration
Recent Legal Developments in Carbon Sequestration
Abstract
Carbon sequestration is the process of capturing carbon dioxide ("CO2") emissions, which would otherwise be released into the atmosphere, and permanently st...
Simulating Grazing Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics in Semi-arid Rangelands (Southern Iran)
Simulating Grazing Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics in Semi-arid Rangelands (Southern Iran)
Abstract
Grazing is one of the main causes of rangeland degradation worldwide, due to the effects of overgrazing on vegetation cover and biodiversity. But few data are avai...
Responses of fungal communities at different soil depths to grazing intensity in a desert steppe
Responses of fungal communities at different soil depths to grazing intensity in a desert steppe
Grazing can alter the physicochemical properties of soil and quickly influence the composition of microbial communities. However, the effects of grazing intensity on fungal communi...
Simulating carbon sequestration using cellular automata and land use assessment for Karaj, Iran
Simulating carbon sequestration using cellular automata and land use assessment for Karaj, Iran
Abstract. Carbon sequestration has been proposed as a means of slowing the atmospheric and marine accumulation of greenhouse gases. This study used observed and simulated land use/...
Can cows and fish co-exist?
Can cows and fish co-exist?
Our paper provides an ecological perspective on the interrelationship between livestock grazing and riparian areas through a review of topical literature. We also describe the Albe...
The Role of Plant Functional Diversity in Regulating Soil Organic Carbon Stocks under Different Grazing Intensities in Temperate Grassland, China
The Role of Plant Functional Diversity in Regulating Soil Organic Carbon Stocks under Different Grazing Intensities in Temperate Grassland, China
Grazing is very common in the grassland ecosystem, and it has a significant impact on the C stocks and cycle. One of the most important drivers of soil C stocks is functional diver...
Prediction of Carbon Emissions in Guizhou Province-Based on Different Neural Network Models
Prediction of Carbon Emissions in Guizhou Province-Based on Different Neural Network Models
Abstract
Global warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions has become a major challenge facing people all over the world. The study of regional human activities and...

