Javascript must be enabled to continue!
YouTube Videos on Lateral Epicondylitis Often Lack High‐Quality, Reliable Information
View through CrossRef
Purpose
To measure the quality and reliability of information from YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis (LE).
Methods
The first 50 videos obtained from a YouTube search for "lateral epicondylitis" were evaluated. Video reliability was assessed using the
Journal of the American Medical Association
(JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0‐5). The videos’ reliability and quality was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0‐4), and the Lateral Epicondylitis Specific Score (LESS). Analysis of variance was used to examine differences in reliability and quality across content types and uploaders. Multivariate stepwise regressions were conducted to understand how specific video characteristics influence JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores.
Results
The 50 videos had a total viewership of 15,491,927, with an average of 309,838 views per video (range 1,492‐2,814,670). Most videos focused on disease‐specific information (40%). Nonphysician medical professionals created most of the content (56%), followed by physicians (28%). The mean JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores were 2.69 (±.59) of 4.0, 2.64 (±.87) of 5.0, and 4.91 (±1.0) of 7.0, respectively. Analysis showed that academic sources had greater LESS scores (
P
= .035); physicians had higher JAMA benchmark criteria scores than non‐physicians (
P
= .025); nonphysicians had greater GQS than commercials (
P
= .031); and nonphysicians had greater VPI than physicians (
P
= .020). Linear regression analysis showed longer duration videos correlated with greater GCS scores (β: 0.656,
P
< .001) and greater LESS (β: 0.614,
P
< .001), whereas commercial content types had with lower GCS (standardized beta ‐0.280,
P
= .045).
Conclusions
Although YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis have millions of views, the information covered had low to moderate quality and reliability as measured by JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS.
Clinical Relevance
Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition that patients may research online. As the content on YouTube is continually increasing and its popularity remains high, it is important to continually investigate the quality of information available on this platform.
Title: YouTube Videos on Lateral Epicondylitis Often Lack High‐Quality, Reliable Information
Description:
Purpose
To measure the quality and reliability of information from YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis (LE).
Methods
The first 50 videos obtained from a YouTube search for "lateral epicondylitis" were evaluated.
Video reliability was assessed using the
Journal of the American Medical Association
(JAMA) benchmark criteria (range 0‐5).
The videos’ reliability and quality was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0‐4), and the Lateral Epicondylitis Specific Score (LESS).
Analysis of variance was used to examine differences in reliability and quality across content types and uploaders.
Multivariate stepwise regressions were conducted to understand how specific video characteristics influence JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores.
Results
The 50 videos had a total viewership of 15,491,927, with an average of 309,838 views per video (range 1,492‐2,814,670).
Most videos focused on disease‐specific information (40%).
Nonphysician medical professionals created most of the content (56%), followed by physicians (28%).
The mean JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS scores were 2.
69 (±.
59) of 4.
0, 2.
64 (±.
87) of 5.
0, and 4.
91 (±1.
0) of 7.
0, respectively.
Analysis showed that academic sources had greater LESS scores (
P
= .
035); physicians had higher JAMA benchmark criteria scores than non‐physicians (
P
= .
025); nonphysicians had greater GQS than commercials (
P
= .
031); and nonphysicians had greater VPI than physicians (
P
= .
020).
Linear regression analysis showed longer duration videos correlated with greater GCS scores (β: 0.
656,
P
< .
001) and greater LESS (β: 0.
614,
P
< .
001), whereas commercial content types had with lower GCS (standardized beta ‐0.
280,
P
= .
045).
Conclusions
Although YouTube videos related to lateral epicondylitis have millions of views, the information covered had low to moderate quality and reliability as measured by JAMA benchmark criteria, GQS, and LESS.
Clinical Relevance
Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition that patients may research online.
As the content on YouTube is continually increasing and its popularity remains high, it is important to continually investigate the quality of information available on this platform.
Related Results
Social Media Use in Neurology: An Analysis of Alzheimer's Information on TikTok with Emphasis on Role of Healthcare Professionals
Social Media Use in Neurology: An Analysis of Alzheimer's Information on TikTok with Emphasis on Role of Healthcare Professionals
Abstract
Introduction
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative cause of dementia. Social media has become a major source of information for patients and famili...
Being Jacob: Young Children, Automedial Subjectivity, and Child Social Media Influencers
Being Jacob: Young Children, Automedial Subjectivity, and Child Social Media Influencers
Introduction Children are not only born digital, they are fashioned toward a lifestyle that needs them to be digital all the time (Palfrey and Gasser). They click, tap, save, circu...
Comparison of conservative treatment of lateral epicondylitis with wrist splint and epicondylitis band: Assessing patient compliance and clinical outcomes
Short (Running) Title: Compliance with orthoses in lateral epicondylitis
Comparison of conservative treatment of lateral epicondylitis with wrist splint and epicondylitis band: Assessing patient compliance and clinical outcomes
Short (Running) Title: Compliance with orthoses in lateral epicondylitis
Objective: Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as "tennis elbow," is a prevalent condition affecting middle-aged individuals. The lack of a universally accepted treatment protoco...
Analyzing Quality of YouTube Videos about Premature Ovarian Failure in the Past Decade
Analyzing Quality of YouTube Videos about Premature Ovarian Failure in the Past Decade
Abstract
Background
To determine the quality of YouTube videos about premature ovarian failure (POF), and variations in quality of professional YouTube videos about POF.
M...
Optimalisasi Media Sosial Youtube sebagai Media Berwirausaha
Optimalisasi Media Sosial Youtube sebagai Media Berwirausaha
YouTube is a website that allows people to upload and exchange videos. YouTube is an effective social media platform for companies to introduce their products through video content...
Quais os comentários negativos e estratégias de enfrentamento mais comuns e eficazes na plataforma digital Youtube?
Quais os comentários negativos e estratégias de enfrentamento mais comuns e eficazes na plataforma digital Youtube?
O presente estudo tem como objetivo compreender qual a tipologia de comentário negativo mais comum nos comentários referentes a vídeos postados na plataforma YouTube, bem como as t...
Epicondylitis Band or Corticosteroid Injection for Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment?
Epicondylitis Band or Corticosteroid Injection for Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment?
Objectives:
Comparison of the short and medium-term results of the epicondylitis brace with corticosteroid and local anesthetic injections for lateral epicondyl...
In Vitro Effect of Triamcinolone and Platelet-rich Plasma on Lateral Epicondylitis-derived Cells
In Vitro Effect of Triamcinolone and Platelet-rich Plasma on Lateral Epicondylitis-derived Cells
Abstract
Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a common musculoskeletal condition. However, the treatment of LE is still controversial. The present study evaluated the ...

