Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
View through CrossRef
ObjectiveTo understand the association between medical negligence claims and doctors’ sex, age, specialty, working hours, work location, personality, social supports, family circumstances, self-rated health, self-rated life satisfaction and presence of recent injury or illness.Design and settingProspective cohort study of Australian doctors.Participants12 134 doctors who completed the Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey between 2013 and 2019.Primary outcome measureDoctors named as a defendant in a medical negligence claim in the preceding 12 months.Results649 (5.35%) doctors reported being named in a medical negligence claim during the study period. In addition to previously identified demographic factors (sex, age and specialty), we identified the following vocational and psychosocial risk factors for claims: working full time (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.94) or overtime hours (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.23), working in a regional centre (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.08), increasing job demands (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.30), low self-rated life satisfaction (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.91) and recent serious personal injury or illness (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.72). Having an agreeable personality was mildly protective (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.00). When stratified according to sex, we found that working in a regional area, low self-rated life satisfaction and not achieving work–life balance predicted medical negligence claims in male, but not female, doctors. However, working more than part-time hours and having a recent personal injury or illness predicted medical negligence claims in female, but not male, doctors. Increasing age predicted claims more strongly in male doctors. Personality type predicted claims in both male and female doctors.ConclusionsModifiable risk factors contribute to an increased risk of medical negligence claims among doctors in Australia. Creating more supportive work environments and targeting interventions that improve doctors’ health and well-being could reduce the risk of medical negligence claims and contribute to improved patient safety.
Title: Vocational and psychosocial predictors of medical negligence claims among Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
Description:
ObjectiveTo understand the association between medical negligence claims and doctors’ sex, age, specialty, working hours, work location, personality, social supports, family circumstances, self-rated health, self-rated life satisfaction and presence of recent injury or illness.
Design and settingProspective cohort study of Australian doctors.
Participants12 134 doctors who completed the Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life survey between 2013 and 2019.
Primary outcome measureDoctors named as a defendant in a medical negligence claim in the preceding 12 months.
Results649 (5.
35%) doctors reported being named in a medical negligence claim during the study period.
In addition to previously identified demographic factors (sex, age and specialty), we identified the following vocational and psychosocial risk factors for claims: working full time (OR=1.
48, 95% CI 1.
13 to 1.
94) or overtime hours (OR 1.
70, 95% CI 1.
29 to 2.
23), working in a regional centre (OR 1.
69, 95% CI 1.
37 to 2.
08), increasing job demands (OR 1.
16, 95% CI 1.
04 to 1.
30), low self-rated life satisfaction (OR 1.
43, 95% CI 1.
08 to 1.
91) and recent serious personal injury or illness (OR 1.
40, 95% CI 1.
13 to 1.
72).
Having an agreeable personality was mildly protective (OR 0.
91, 95% CI 0.
83 to 1.
00).
When stratified according to sex, we found that working in a regional area, low self-rated life satisfaction and not achieving work–life balance predicted medical negligence claims in male, but not female, doctors.
However, working more than part-time hours and having a recent personal injury or illness predicted medical negligence claims in female, but not male, doctors.
Increasing age predicted claims more strongly in male doctors.
Personality type predicted claims in both male and female doctors.
ConclusionsModifiable risk factors contribute to an increased risk of medical negligence claims among doctors in Australia.
Creating more supportive work environments and targeting interventions that improve doctors’ health and well-being could reduce the risk of medical negligence claims and contribute to improved patient safety.
Related Results
Vocational and business training to improve women's labour market outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Vocational and business training to improve women's labour market outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the impact of vocational and business training targeted at women in low- and middle-income countries. The review summarises evidence from t...
Medical negligence claims and the health and life satisfaction of Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
Medical negligence claims and the health and life satisfaction of Australian doctors: a prospective cohort analysis of the MABEL survey
ObjectiveTo assess the association between medical negligence claims and doctors’ self-rated health and life satisfaction.DesignProspective cohort study.ParticipantsRegistered doct...
Trooping the (School) Colour
Trooping the (School) Colour
Introduction
Throughout the early and mid-twentieth century, cadet training was a feature of many secondary schools and educational establishments across Australia, with countless ...
Cohort studies
Cohort studies
A cohort study is one in which the outcome (usually disease status) is ascertained for groups of individuals defined on the basis of their exposure. At the time exposure status is ...
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
Reclaiming the Wasteland: Samson and Delilah and the Historical Perception and Construction of Indigenous Knowledges in Australian Cinema
It was always based on a teenage love story between the two kids. One is a sniffer and one is not. It was designed for Central Australia because we do write these kids off there. N...
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
Climate Change and Children
Australian children are uniquely situated in a vast landscape that varies drastically across locations. Spanning multiple climatic zones—from cool tempe...
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE: CURRENT SCENARIO IN INDIA
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE: CURRENT SCENARIO IN INDIA
Medical profession, one of the noblest professions, but not immune to negligence due to lack of reasonable degree of care and skill or willful negligence, which causes injury or de...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

