Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pediatric Scar Management Using Tangential Excision With Intralesional Injections and Laser-Assisted 5-Fluorouracil Delivery

View through CrossRef
Background Pediatric hypertrophic and keloid scars have traditionally been treated via intralesional steroid injections. The advent of modalities such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and tangential excision present opportunities for improved therapy; however, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) safety and efficacy in the pediatric population are not well established. The aim of this study is to compare the risk and efficacy of 5-FU in pediatric scar management. Methods A multi-institution retrospective study from 2012 to 2023 was designed with identification of 108 patients aged ≤17, undergoing CO2 laser-assisted 5-FU delivery, or tangential excision with immediate or delayed 5-FU/triamcinolone injections. Modified Scar Rating Scale assessed individual scar outcomes comparing the following groups: 5-FU alone versus triamcinolone use; tangential excision with immediate versus delayed injections; and number of injections above/below the median of 4 episodes of injections. Mann-Whitney U test determined significance. Fisher exact test compared complication and recurrence rates. Results Total scar quality scores improved (P < 0.05) with tangential excision plus <4 injections (n = 44; Δ = −0.581) and tangential excision with 5-FU only (n = 39; Δ = −0.775). Tangential excision with 5-FU alone decreased height (P < 0.05; Δ = −0.5878) compared to tangential excision with triamcinolone use (n = 46). Color match improved (P < 0.05) with tangential excision plus <4 injections (Δ = −0.449) and tangential excision with delayed injections (n = 29; Δ = −0.380). Tangential excision with any 5-FU use (n = 62) had higher complication rates (4.84%) than tangential excision with triamcinolone only (n = 30; 0%) or tangential excision with 5-FU only (n = 37; 5.41%), but complication rates did not significantly differ. CO2 laser-assisted 5-FU (n = 16) complication rates (6.25%) did not significantly differ from tangential excision with 5-FU or triamcinolone. No systemic complications were identified. Recurrence rates between all groups did not differ significantly. Conclusions Tangential excision with 5-FU monotherapy demonstrated lower scar height and improved overall scar quality, further solidifying the benefits of 5-FU. CO2 laser-assisted 5-FU delivery had similar complication rates as the other studied modalities. This pediatric study had no systemic complications and overall similar complication rates compared to adult studies. This study demonstrates the utility of 5-FU in pediatric scar therapy and provides data regarding novel approaches to difficult pediatric scar management.
Title: Pediatric Scar Management Using Tangential Excision With Intralesional Injections and Laser-Assisted 5-Fluorouracil Delivery
Description:
Background Pediatric hypertrophic and keloid scars have traditionally been treated via intralesional steroid injections.
The advent of modalities such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and tangential excision present opportunities for improved therapy; however, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) safety and efficacy in the pediatric population are not well established.
The aim of this study is to compare the risk and efficacy of 5-FU in pediatric scar management.
Methods A multi-institution retrospective study from 2012 to 2023 was designed with identification of 108 patients aged ≤17, undergoing CO2 laser-assisted 5-FU delivery, or tangential excision with immediate or delayed 5-FU/triamcinolone injections.
Modified Scar Rating Scale assessed individual scar outcomes comparing the following groups: 5-FU alone versus triamcinolone use; tangential excision with immediate versus delayed injections; and number of injections above/below the median of 4 episodes of injections.
Mann-Whitney U test determined significance.
Fisher exact test compared complication and recurrence rates.
Results Total scar quality scores improved (P < 0.
05) with tangential excision plus <4 injections (n = 44; Δ = −0.
581) and tangential excision with 5-FU only (n = 39; Δ = −0.
775).
Tangential excision with 5-FU alone decreased height (P < 0.
05; Δ = −0.
5878) compared to tangential excision with triamcinolone use (n = 46).
Color match improved (P < 0.
05) with tangential excision plus <4 injections (Δ = −0.
449) and tangential excision with delayed injections (n = 29; Δ = −0.
380).
Tangential excision with any 5-FU use (n = 62) had higher complication rates (4.
84%) than tangential excision with triamcinolone only (n = 30; 0%) or tangential excision with 5-FU only (n = 37; 5.
41%), but complication rates did not significantly differ.
CO2 laser-assisted 5-FU (n = 16) complication rates (6.
25%) did not significantly differ from tangential excision with 5-FU or triamcinolone.
No systemic complications were identified.
Recurrence rates between all groups did not differ significantly.
Conclusions Tangential excision with 5-FU monotherapy demonstrated lower scar height and improved overall scar quality, further solidifying the benefits of 5-FU.
CO2 laser-assisted 5-FU delivery had similar complication rates as the other studied modalities.
This pediatric study had no systemic complications and overall similar complication rates compared to adult studies.
This study demonstrates the utility of 5-FU in pediatric scar therapy and provides data regarding novel approaches to difficult pediatric scar management.

Related Results

Surgical Scar Endometriosis: A Painful Scar
Surgical Scar Endometriosis: A Painful Scar
Introduction: A variant of extrapelvic endometriosis known as "surgical scar endometriosis" is defined by the development of functional endometrial glands and stroma close to the s...
Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) Scar Scale (JSS) for Assessing Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) Scar Scale (JSS) for Assessing Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
AbstractThe Vancouver scar scale, the Manchester scar scale, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) are all very well-known scar evaluation methods. These tools...
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
BACKGROUND: A workforce analysis was conducted to predict whether the projected future supply of pediatric anesthesiologists is balanced with the requirements of the in...
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
BACKGROUND: The geographic relationship between pediatric anesthesiologists and the pediatric population has potentially important clinical and policy implications. In ...
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF UTERINE SCAR TENDERNESS AND THIRD TRIMESTER SONOGRAPHIC SCAR THINNING IN PREDICTING SCAR COMPLICATIONS
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF UTERINE SCAR TENDERNESS AND THIRD TRIMESTER SONOGRAPHIC SCAR THINNING IN PREDICTING SCAR COMPLICATIONS
Objective: To determine the clinical significance of uterine scar tenderness and sonographic scar thinning in predicting strength of scar in patients with lower segment cesarean se...
Insights into the involvement of noncoding RNAs in 5-fluorouracil drug resistance
Insights into the involvement of noncoding RNAs in 5-fluorouracil drug resistance
5-Fluorouracil is a classic chemotherapeutic drug that is widely used to treat various cancers. However, patients often exhibit primary or acquired drug resistance during treatment...
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Presentation and Management of Cervical Thoracic Duct Cyst: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract Introduction Thoracic duct cysts are an uncommon phenomenon, especially within the cervical region. Due to its limited reported cases, very little is known about its etiol...

Back to Top