Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Rock Mechanics Approach for Compressibility Determination: an Important Input for Petroleum Reservoir Simulation

View through CrossRef
The main method to predict and manage petroleum reservoirs is numerical simulation in which, traditionally, the only geomechanical parameter is rock compressibility. Usually it is adopted one single and constant value for the whole model. During exploitation, though, reservoir-rock deforms, causing porosity and permeability variation. While the first effect may not be well predicted by rock compressibility, the second is simply kept constant. Besides that, each facies has its own stress-strain behavior. Even though reservoir simulation models are very sensitive to compressibility values, it is not treated with the proper relevance: it is usually used as a matching parameter and, when special petrophysical experiments are not available, it is a common practice to use porosity and facies based correlations to determine reservoir compressibility. The compressibility may be used to represent geomechanics in three different forms: (i) in conventional reservoir simulation, in a simplified way of representing geomechanics; (ii) in pseudo-coupling, in which the rock compressibility behavior may be taken to reservoir simulation through tables that correlate pore pressure to porosity and permeability multipliers and (iii) in two-way coupling simulation, in which the compressibility may be one of the coupling parameters. The aim of this work is to show the importance of rock compressibility in reservoir simulation and to propose a better way of representing it in numerical models based on laboratory experiments.
Title: A Rock Mechanics Approach for Compressibility Determination: an Important Input for Petroleum Reservoir Simulation
Description:
The main method to predict and manage petroleum reservoirs is numerical simulation in which, traditionally, the only geomechanical parameter is rock compressibility.
Usually it is adopted one single and constant value for the whole model.
During exploitation, though, reservoir-rock deforms, causing porosity and permeability variation.
While the first effect may not be well predicted by rock compressibility, the second is simply kept constant.
Besides that, each facies has its own stress-strain behavior.
Even though reservoir simulation models are very sensitive to compressibility values, it is not treated with the proper relevance: it is usually used as a matching parameter and, when special petrophysical experiments are not available, it is a common practice to use porosity and facies based correlations to determine reservoir compressibility.
The compressibility may be used to represent geomechanics in three different forms: (i) in conventional reservoir simulation, in a simplified way of representing geomechanics; (ii) in pseudo-coupling, in which the rock compressibility behavior may be taken to reservoir simulation through tables that correlate pore pressure to porosity and permeability multipliers and (iii) in two-way coupling simulation, in which the compressibility may be one of the coupling parameters.
The aim of this work is to show the importance of rock compressibility in reservoir simulation and to propose a better way of representing it in numerical models based on laboratory experiments.

Related Results

Reliability-based design (RBD) of shallow foundations on rock masses
Reliability-based design (RBD) of shallow foundations on rock masses
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] The reliability-based design (RBD) approach that separately accounts for variability and uncertainty in load(...
Petroleum Reservoir Simulation Coupling Flow and Deformation
Petroleum Reservoir Simulation Coupling Flow and Deformation
Abstract The paper presents a discussion on the issues related to the interaction between rock deformation and multiphase fluid flow behaviour in hydrocarbon rese...
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference. Abstract 1 Int...
Petroleum Education in the People’s Republic of China
Petroleum Education in the People’s Republic of China
Abstract Petroleum education in China is, like petroleum production itself, a development of relatively recent years. In 1949, when the annual crude oil output was 1...
Risk Assessment of Oil Fields Using Proxy Models: A Case Study
Risk Assessment of Oil Fields Using Proxy Models: A Case Study
Abstract Reservoir studies commonly consider many scenarios, cases and realizations. However, reservoir simulation can be expensive. Statistical design has been u...
In Situ Permeability-porosity Relationship In Clean Formations
In Situ Permeability-porosity Relationship In Clean Formations
Abstract The results of several investigations showed that rock properties under in-situ stress conditions can be significantly different from those measured at n...
Risk Assessment of Oil Fields Using Proxy Models: A Case Study
Risk Assessment of Oil Fields Using Proxy Models: A Case Study
Abstract Reservoir studies commonly consider many scenarios, cases, and realizations. However, reservoir simulation can be expensive. Statistical design has been ...

Back to Top