Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Civilizational identity of Russia and culture. Part 1
View through CrossRef
This article raises and discusses the need to substantiate a holistic view of collective identity. This formulation of the question is a reaction to the use of the concept of “identity” in various senses in modern scientific literature. Some scholars distinguish ethnic identity, others cultural identity, and others national or transnational identity. But we should also talk about individual, collective and subcultural identity. But these varieties of collective identity are in a difficult relationship. And besides, they are all components of the so-called civilizational identity. But is their synthesis always possible? The author proves that the identity integrity of peoples is the most common system-forming level at which all varieties of collective identity form a hierarchical structural unity. Synthesis, which is so necessary for the functioning of civilization, is possible only at this level. The subject of the research in the article is the formation of the civilizational identity of Russia in history. Proving this idea, the author argues that the formation of collective identity in Russia goes through several stages, which implies its consideration not in short, but in long time stretches. To clarify the different periods in the formation of identity in Russia, the author turns to L. Gumilev’s ethnological concept. However, tracing the history of the formation of collective identity involves not only identifying its temporal, but also spatial coordinates. The author illustrates this position with the desire to expand the space that has taken place in Russia since the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries. The history of the Russian advance towards the North and the Far East fits into this phase. According to the author, the psychology of people of this time indicates that the collective identity of Russians in this period for the first time acquired clear forms of manifestation, which determined the collective identity of Russia in the following centuries. A further presentation of the research findings will be offered in Part 2.
Title: Civilizational identity of Russia and culture. Part 1
Description:
This article raises and discusses the need to substantiate a holistic view of collective identity.
This formulation of the question is a reaction to the use of the concept of “identity” in various senses in modern scientific literature.
Some scholars distinguish ethnic identity, others cultural identity, and others national or transnational identity.
But we should also talk about individual, collective and subcultural identity.
But these varieties of collective identity are in a difficult relationship.
And besides, they are all components of the so-called civilizational identity.
But is their synthesis always possible? The author proves that the identity integrity of peoples is the most common system-forming level at which all varieties of collective identity form a hierarchical structural unity.
Synthesis, which is so necessary for the functioning of civilization, is possible only at this level.
The subject of the research in the article is the formation of the civilizational identity of Russia in history.
Proving this idea, the author argues that the formation of collective identity in Russia goes through several stages, which implies its consideration not in short, but in long time stretches.
To clarify the different periods in the formation of identity in Russia, the author turns to L.
Gumilev’s ethnological concept.
However, tracing the history of the formation of collective identity involves not only identifying its temporal, but also spatial coordinates.
The author illustrates this position with the desire to expand the space that has taken place in Russia since the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries.
The history of the Russian advance towards the North and the Far East fits into this phase.
According to the author, the psychology of people of this time indicates that the collective identity of Russians in this period for the first time acquired clear forms of manifestation, which determined the collective identity of Russia in the following centuries.
A further presentation of the research findings will be offered in Part 2.
Related Results
Western Civilization and Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic Partnership
Western Civilization and Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic Partnership
The article deals with Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic geopolitical vector in a modern geopolitical situation. The authors argue that a link between national interests and geopolitical vec...
Civilizational identity of Russia and culture. Part 2
Civilizational identity of Russia and culture. Part 2
This article is the second part of the publication: Хренов Н. А. Цивилизационная идентичность России и культура. Часть первая // Манускрипт. 2025. Т. 18. Вып. 3. This part continue...
Hierarchy of identities In modern humanitarian discourse
Hierarchy of identities In modern humanitarian discourse
The article examines the problems of terminological confusion in matters of identity and their impact on the social and political atmosphere in societies. The purpose of the articl...
Analiza prikaza afrikanerskog identiteta u povijesnim romanima Karela Schoemana iz postkolonijalne perspektive
Analiza prikaza afrikanerskog identiteta u povijesnim romanima Karela Schoemana iz postkolonijalne perspektive
This dissertation analyzes the narrative strategies in five novels by the South African author Karel Schoeman, specifically the way in which they undermine key historiographical st...
Zheng Xiaoyun`s Theory of Cultural Identity
Zheng Xiaoyun`s Theory of Cultural Identity
This article is an analysis of the theory of cultural identity by Zheng Xiaoyun, a distinguished Chinese philosopher. His theory of cultural identity presented here gives a new per...
Mõtestades materiaalset kultuuri / Making sense of the material culture
Mõtestades materiaalset kultuuri / Making sense of the material culture
People live amidst objects, things, articles, items, artefacts, materials, substances, and stuff – described in social sciences and humanities as material culture, which denotes bo...
Plovdiv – the civilizational model for multicultural coexistence
Plovdiv – the civilizational model for multicultural coexistence
This poster summarizes the main objectives, methods, and results of the fundamental science project Plovdiv - from a multilingual and multicultural center of Eastern Rоumelia to th...
Tijelo u opusu Janka Polića Kamova
Tijelo u opusu Janka Polića Kamova
The doctoral disertation is dedicated to the concept of the body in the works of Janko Polić Kamov. The body is approached as a signifier system on the basis of which numerous and ...


