Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Psychiatric Adverse Events Associated with Semaglutide: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Implications for Clinical Practice
View through CrossRef
Background: The clinical use of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist authorized for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, is quickly growing.. However, concerns have emerged regarding its potential psychiatric adverse effects, including depression, suicidal ideation, and self-harm, prompting an ongoing safety review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Despite these concerns, systematic evidence on psychiatric outcomes associated with semaglutide remains limited.Objectives: In order to guide clinical practice and regulatory decision-making, this systematic review sought to compile the existing data on mental adverse events linked to semaglutide, assess their timing, severity, and resolution, identify relevant risk factors, and investigate underlying processes.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was analyzed in PubMed using the search string ((Psychiatric) OR (Adverse Events)) AND (Semaglutide), restricted to the last five years. Studies were included if they reported psychiatric adverse events associated with semaglutide in the form of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or case reports. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias instrument (RoB 2) were used to evaluate the quality of the study. Because of the variation among investigations, a narrative synthesis was carried out.Results: 12 studies were included, comprising 11 randomized controlled trials and one post-hoc analysis, with sample sizes ranging from 48 to 17,604 participants and follow-up durations from 9 weeks to 4 years. The overall findings did not support an association between semaglutide and increased psychiatric adverse events. A post-hoc analysis of the STEP 1–5 trials demonstrated a small but significant reduction in depressive symptoms compared to placebo (PHQ-9 difference −0.56, P<0.001). The SELECT cardiovascular outcomes trial found serious psychiatric adverse events and suicidal ideation rates to be virtually identical between semaglutide and placebo groups (0.7% vs 0.6% and 0.11% vs 0.11%, respectively). The STEP 4 trial showed lower psychiatric event rates with continued semaglutide versus placebo following discontinuation. Semaglutide was also associated with fewer psychiatric events than liraglutide in the STEP 8 trial, and no worsening of psychotic symptoms was observed in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.Conclusion: Current evidence does not support a causal link between semaglutide and increased psychiatric adverse events at the population level, with several studies suggesting modest mental health benefits. However, the systematic exclusion of patients with active psychiatric disorders from clinical trials, combined with published case reports of semaglutide-associated depression and ongoing regulatory scrutiny, highlights a critical evidence gap. Clinicians should maintain individualized psychiatric monitoring, particularly in patients with a prior psychiatric history, and future research should prioritize psychiatric populations with standardized assessment tools.
Title: Psychiatric Adverse Events Associated with Semaglutide: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Implications for Clinical Practice
Description:
Background: The clinical use of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist authorized for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, is quickly growing.
However, concerns have emerged regarding its potential psychiatric adverse effects, including depression, suicidal ideation, and self-harm, prompting an ongoing safety review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Despite these concerns, systematic evidence on psychiatric outcomes associated with semaglutide remains limited.
Objectives: In order to guide clinical practice and regulatory decision-making, this systematic review sought to compile the existing data on mental adverse events linked to semaglutide, assess their timing, severity, and resolution, identify relevant risk factors, and investigate underlying processes.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was analyzed in PubMed using the search string ((Psychiatric) OR (Adverse Events)) AND (Semaglutide), restricted to the last five years.
Studies were included if they reported psychiatric adverse events associated with semaglutide in the form of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or case reports.
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias instrument (RoB 2) were used to evaluate the quality of the study.
Because of the variation among investigations, a narrative synthesis was carried out.
Results: 12 studies were included, comprising 11 randomized controlled trials and one post-hoc analysis, with sample sizes ranging from 48 to 17,604 participants and follow-up durations from 9 weeks to 4 years.
The overall findings did not support an association between semaglutide and increased psychiatric adverse events.
A post-hoc analysis of the STEP 1–5 trials demonstrated a small but significant reduction in depressive symptoms compared to placebo (PHQ-9 difference −0.
56, P<0.
001).
The SELECT cardiovascular outcomes trial found serious psychiatric adverse events and suicidal ideation rates to be virtually identical between semaglutide and placebo groups (0.
7% vs 0.
6% and 0.
11% vs 0.
11%, respectively).
The STEP 4 trial showed lower psychiatric event rates with continued semaglutide versus placebo following discontinuation.
Semaglutide was also associated with fewer psychiatric events than liraglutide in the STEP 8 trial, and no worsening of psychotic symptoms was observed in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.
Conclusion: Current evidence does not support a causal link between semaglutide and increased psychiatric adverse events at the population level, with several studies suggesting modest mental health benefits.
However, the systematic exclusion of patients with active psychiatric disorders from clinical trials, combined with published case reports of semaglutide-associated depression and ongoing regulatory scrutiny, highlights a critical evidence gap.
Clinicians should maintain individualized psychiatric monitoring, particularly in patients with a prior psychiatric history, and future research should prioritize psychiatric populations with standardized assessment tools.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Safety of Semaglutide
Safety of Semaglutide
The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) semaglutide is the most recently approved agent of this drug class, and the only GLP-1RA currently available as both subcutan...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Effect of High‑Fat-Diet and Semaglutide on Bladder Cancer in Mice
Effect of High‑Fat-Diet and Semaglutide on Bladder Cancer in Mice
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to examine the proteomics of adipose tissue in mice with obesity induced by a high-fat diet, in order to investigate how obesity...
Impact of Semaglutide as Weight Management Medication on Clinical Parameters and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Single-Center Study from Saudi Arabia
Impact of Semaglutide as Weight Management Medication on Clinical Parameters and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Single-Center Study from Saudi Arabia
Background: Despite the cardiometabolic benefit of semaglutide, its impact on quality of life and whether patients’ characteristics influence clinical outcomes and health-related q...
A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide Compared to Injectables in Controlling Diabetes and Weight Reduction
A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide Compared to Injectables in Controlling Diabetes and Weight Reduction
Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety, weight reduction and treatment adherence of oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide in adults with uncontrolled T2DM and obesity. Methods: ...

