Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Plural Predication

View through CrossRef
AbstractPlural predication is a pervasive part of ordinary language. We can say that some people are fifty in number, are surrounding a building, come from many countries, and are classmates. These predicates can be true of some people without being true of any one of them; they are non-distributive predications. Yet the apparatus of predication and quantification in standard modern logic does not allow a place for such non-distributive predicates. This book explores the enrichment of modern logic with plural predication and quantification. We can have genuinely non-distributive predication without relying on singularizing procedures from set theory and mereology. The fundamental ‘among’ relation can be understood in a way that does not generate any hierarchy of plurals analogous to a hierarchy of types or a hierarchy of higher-order logics. Singular quantification can be understood as a special case, with the general type being quantifiers that allow both singular and plural quantification. The ‘among’ relation is formally similar to a ‘part of’ relation, but the relations are distinct, so that mass quantification and plural quantification cannot be united in the same way that plural and singular are united. Analysis of singular and plural definite descriptions follows, with a defence of a fundamentally Russellian analysis, but coupled with some new ideas about how to be sensitive to the role of context. This facilitates an analysis of some central features of the use of pronouns, both singular and plural.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Plural Predication
Description:
AbstractPlural predication is a pervasive part of ordinary language.
We can say that some people are fifty in number, are surrounding a building, come from many countries, and are classmates.
These predicates can be true of some people without being true of any one of them; they are non-distributive predications.
Yet the apparatus of predication and quantification in standard modern logic does not allow a place for such non-distributive predicates.
This book explores the enrichment of modern logic with plural predication and quantification.
We can have genuinely non-distributive predication without relying on singularizing procedures from set theory and mereology.
The fundamental ‘among’ relation can be understood in a way that does not generate any hierarchy of plurals analogous to a hierarchy of types or a hierarchy of higher-order logics.
Singular quantification can be understood as a special case, with the general type being quantifiers that allow both singular and plural quantification.
The ‘among’ relation is formally similar to a ‘part of’ relation, but the relations are distinct, so that mass quantification and plural quantification cannot be united in the same way that plural and singular are united.
Analysis of singular and plural definite descriptions follows, with a defence of a fundamentally Russellian analysis, but coupled with some new ideas about how to be sensitive to the role of context.
This facilitates an analysis of some central features of the use of pronouns, both singular and plural.

Related Results

The Puzzle of the Sophist
The Puzzle of the Sophist
Abstract The many definitions of sophistry at the beginning of Plato’s Sophist have puzzled scholars just as much as they puzzled the dialogue’s main speakers: the V...
La experiencia boliviana y la organización comunitaria cooperativa en el marco de la economía plural
La experiencia boliviana y la organización comunitaria cooperativa en el marco de la economía plural
<p>El autor sostiene que, a diferencia de lo que postula el Modelo de Economía Plural, el proceso de avance en la realidad boliviana es desigual, dado que, por una parte, se ...
The syntax and morphology of nominal modification in Ògè
The syntax and morphology of nominal modification in Ògè
This dissertation investigates several aspects of nominal modification in Ògè, an understudied language of Benue-congo spoken in Àkókó Northwest in Nigeria. The study focuses on tw...
Cumulation Across Attitudes and Plural Projection
Cumulation Across Attitudes and Plural Projection
AbstractThis paper investigates cumulative readings of sentences in which some, but not all of the plural expressions have a de dicto reading, i.e. sentences where the lower plural...
Accommodating number neutrality in Alasha Mongolian: markedness and semantic interpretation
Accommodating number neutrality in Alasha Mongolian: markedness and semantic interpretation
Abstract Morpho-syntactic markedness for number does not always seem to align with a singular or plural semantics. I show that in Alasha Mongolian (Mongolic) unmarke...
O possessivo de 2a pessoa em PB dialetal
O possessivo de 2a pessoa em PB dialetal
Resumo: Em português padrão, assim como em outras línguas românicas, os pronomes possessivos carregam traços não interpretáveis de número, que são valorados via concordância nomina...
In Defense of Plural Marriage
In Defense of Plural Marriage
With over half of Americans now in favor of marriage equality, it is clear that societal norms of marriage are being quickly redefined. The growing belief that the state may not di...
Postjugoslavenska književnost i njezin plural – između privida revolucije i straha od restauracije
Postjugoslavenska književnost i njezin plural – između privida revolucije i straha od restauracije
This paper analyses the phrase post ­Yugoslav literature in relation to the plural form of post ­Yugoslav literatures, which is then followed by a prescriptivist practice that pr...

Back to Top