Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions without ROSE: a prospec
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background and aims
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition, including both fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has been frequently performed to acquire samples from both pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Still, the impact of the diagnostic yield between FNA and FNB is uncertain. We conducted this study to compare the diagnostic performance and accuracy of the 22-gauge FNA needles with the 22-gauge FNB needles in sampling solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions.
Methods
This is a prospective multicenter study conducted on 465 cases presented with solid pancreatic or non-pancreatic lesions.
Results
Patients were 275 male and 190 females with a mean age of 59 years. Three-hundred twenty-seven patients had solid pancreatic lesions, while 138 had non-pancreatic lesions; 245 cases underwent EUS-FNA, and the remaining 211 cases underwent EUS-FNB. The presence of intact tissue core and sample adequacy was significantly higher in the FNB cases in solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Blood contamination was significantly more in cell blocks and smears of EUS-FNA compared to that of EUS-FNB in solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Based on histologic assessment of cell block only, EUS-FNB had more diagnostic accuracy (99%) than FNA (61%) (
P
-value < 0.005). However, cytological diagnosis by smears only showed no significant difference. The combined cytological and histological evaluation had 100% sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
Conclusion
EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB have comparable accuracy in diagnosing solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions without ROSE. EUS-FNB is superior to EUS-FNA in acquiring intact tissue core and adequate samples with little blood contamination. Based on histological assessment (cell block/tissue core) only, EUS-FNA has less accuracy than EUS-FNB in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions.
Title: Comparative diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions without ROSE: a prospec
Description:
Abstract
Background and aims
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition, including both fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has been frequently performed to acquire samples from both pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions.
Still, the impact of the diagnostic yield between FNA and FNB is uncertain.
We conducted this study to compare the diagnostic performance and accuracy of the 22-gauge FNA needles with the 22-gauge FNB needles in sampling solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions.
Methods
This is a prospective multicenter study conducted on 465 cases presented with solid pancreatic or non-pancreatic lesions.
Results
Patients were 275 male and 190 females with a mean age of 59 years.
Three-hundred twenty-seven patients had solid pancreatic lesions, while 138 had non-pancreatic lesions; 245 cases underwent EUS-FNA, and the remaining 211 cases underwent EUS-FNB.
The presence of intact tissue core and sample adequacy was significantly higher in the FNB cases in solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions.
Blood contamination was significantly more in cell blocks and smears of EUS-FNA compared to that of EUS-FNB in solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions.
Based on histologic assessment of cell block only, EUS-FNB had more diagnostic accuracy (99%) than FNA (61%) (
P
-value < 0.
005).
However, cytological diagnosis by smears only showed no significant difference.
The combined cytological and histological evaluation had 100% sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
Conclusion
EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB have comparable accuracy in diagnosing solid pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions without ROSE.
EUS-FNB is superior to EUS-FNA in acquiring intact tissue core and adequate samples with little blood contamination.
Based on histological assessment (cell block/tissue core) only, EUS-FNA has less accuracy than EUS-FNB in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions.
Related Results
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next‐generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound–guided FNA and FNB
Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next‐generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound–guided FNA and FNB
BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound–guided tissue acquisition (EUS‐TA), especially endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine‐needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA), is the mainstay of tissue acquisition ...
Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study
Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study
Abstract
Background and study aims Recently, a new Franseen design endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) needle was developed with the goal of providi...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Tissue Sampling Adequacy for Molecular Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Tissue Sampling Adequacy for Molecular Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Background and Aims: There is limited literature on sample adequacy for molecular testing in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma obtained via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle a...
Application of endoscopic ultrasound guided needle biopsy in patients with pancreatic tumor
Application of endoscopic ultrasound guided needle biopsy in patients with pancreatic tumor
Background: Pancreatic cancer is a rapidly progressive disease, low 5-year survival rate (less than 11%). However, if pancreatic tumors detected and treated early, the 5-year survi...
Diagnostic impact of EUS(b)-FNA in diagnostics of sarcoidosis
Diagnostic impact of EUS(b)-FNA in diagnostics of sarcoidosis
RATIONALE. Endosonography with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) became a promising method of choice for sarcoidosis, but still data regarding the contribution of EUS-FNA on final e...
925 Incremental Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Detecting Pancreatic Lesions in Patients With MEN1
925 Incremental Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Detecting Pancreatic Lesions in Patients With MEN1
INTRODUCTION:
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is an inherited disorder that affects the endocrine glands caused by a mutation in the MEN1 gene. MEN1 is associated w...

