Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundWomen experience adverse drug reactions, ADRs, nearly twice as often as men, yet the role of sex as a biological factor in the generation of ADRs is poorly understood. Most drugs currently in use were approved based on clinical trials conducted on men, so women may be overmedicated. We determined whether sex differences in drug pharmacokinetics, PKs, predict sex differences in ADRs.MethodsSearches of the ISI Web of Science and PubMed databases were conducted with combinations of the terms: drugs, sex or gender, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug safety, drug dose, and adverse drug reaction, which yielded over 5000 articles with considerable overlap. We obtained information from each relevant article on significant sex differences in PK measures, predominantly area under the curve, peak/maximum concentrations, and clearance/elimination rates. ADRs were identified from every relevant article and recorded categorically as female-biased, male-biased, or not sex-biased.ResultsFor most of the FDA-approved drugs examined, elevated blood concentrations and longer elimination times were manifested by women, and these PKs were strongly linked to sex differences in ADRs. Of the 86 drugs evaluated, 76 had higher PK values in women; for 59 drugs with clinically identifiable ADRs, sex-biased PKs predicted the direction of sex-biased ADRs in 88% of cases. Ninety-six percent of drugs with female-biased PK values were associated with a higher incidence of ADRs in women than men, but only 29% of male-biased PKs predicted male-biased ADRs. Accessible PK information is available for only a small fraction of all drugsConclusionsSex differences in pharmacokinetics strongly predict sex-specific ADRs for women but not men. This sex difference was not explained by sex differences in body weight. The absence of sex-stratified PK information in public records for hundreds of drugs raises the concern that sex differences in PK values are widespread and of clinical significance. The common practice of prescribing equal drug doses to women and men neglects sex differences in pharmacokinetics and dimorphisms in body weight, risks overmedication of women, and contributes to female-biased adverse drug reactions. We recommend evidence-based dose reductions for women to counteract this sex bias.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women
Description:
AbstractBackgroundWomen experience adverse drug reactions, ADRs, nearly twice as often as men, yet the role of sex as a biological factor in the generation of ADRs is poorly understood.
Most drugs currently in use were approved based on clinical trials conducted on men, so women may be overmedicated.
We determined whether sex differences in drug pharmacokinetics, PKs, predict sex differences in ADRs.
MethodsSearches of the ISI Web of Science and PubMed databases were conducted with combinations of the terms: drugs, sex or gender, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug safety, drug dose, and adverse drug reaction, which yielded over 5000 articles with considerable overlap.
We obtained information from each relevant article on significant sex differences in PK measures, predominantly area under the curve, peak/maximum concentrations, and clearance/elimination rates.
ADRs were identified from every relevant article and recorded categorically as female-biased, male-biased, or not sex-biased.
ResultsFor most of the FDA-approved drugs examined, elevated blood concentrations and longer elimination times were manifested by women, and these PKs were strongly linked to sex differences in ADRs.
Of the 86 drugs evaluated, 76 had higher PK values in women; for 59 drugs with clinically identifiable ADRs, sex-biased PKs predicted the direction of sex-biased ADRs in 88% of cases.
Ninety-six percent of drugs with female-biased PK values were associated with a higher incidence of ADRs in women than men, but only 29% of male-biased PKs predicted male-biased ADRs.
Accessible PK information is available for only a small fraction of all drugsConclusionsSex differences in pharmacokinetics strongly predict sex-specific ADRs for women but not men.
This sex difference was not explained by sex differences in body weight.
The absence of sex-stratified PK information in public records for hundreds of drugs raises the concern that sex differences in PK values are widespread and of clinical significance.
The common practice of prescribing equal drug doses to women and men neglects sex differences in pharmacokinetics and dimorphisms in body weight, risks overmedication of women, and contributes to female-biased adverse drug reactions.
We recommend evidence-based dose reductions for women to counteract this sex bias.
Related Results
Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender
Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender
Abstract
Background
Evidence from clinical research indicates that men and women can differ in response to drug treatment. The knowledge database Ja...
Integrated analysis of robust sex-biased gene signatures in human brain
Integrated analysis of robust sex-biased gene signatures in human brain
Abstract
Background
Sexual dimorphism is highly prominent in mammals with many physiological and behavioral differences between male and female form...
Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains
Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains
AbstractIn this systematic review, we highlight the differences between the male and female zebrafish brains to understand their differentiation and their use in studying sex-speci...
Are Men Who Buy Sex Different from Men Who Do Not?: Exploring Sex Life Characteristics Based on a Randomized Population Survey in Sweden
Are Men Who Buy Sex Different from Men Who Do Not?: Exploring Sex Life Characteristics Based on a Randomized Population Survey in Sweden
AbstractThe buying and selling of sex is a topic of frequent discussion and a relevant public health issue. Studies of sex workers are available, while studies addressing the deman...
In search of sex-related mediators of affective illness
In search of sex-related mediators of affective illness
AbstractSex differences in the rates of affective disorders have been recognized for decades. Studies of physiologic sex-related differences in animals and humans, however, have ge...
Mephedrone, assassin of youth: The rhetoric of fear in contemporary drug scares
Mephedrone, assassin of youth: The rhetoric of fear in contemporary drug scares
This article examines how mephedrone, the most popular legal high sold freely in the United Kingdom until its classification as a high-risk drug, in April 2010, was constructed by ...
VIII. Captured in terminology: Sex, sex categories, and sex differences
VIII. Captured in terminology: Sex, sex categories, and sex differences
Swayed by the clear distinction between male and female genitalia, the question of how far these categories extend into human biology has attracted humans for centuries. This quest...
The impact of sex and gender on immunotherapy outcomes
The impact of sex and gender on immunotherapy outcomes
AbstractImmunotherapies are often used for the treatment, remission, and possible cure of autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, and cancers. Empirical evidence illustrates that...