Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Integrated analysis of robust sex-biased gene signatures in human brain
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Sexual dimorphism is highly prominent in mammals with many physiological and behavioral differences between male and female form of the species. Accordingly, the fundamental social and cultural stratification factors for humans is sex. The sex differences are thought to emerge from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. It distinguishes individuals most prominently on the reproductive traits, but also affects many of the other related traits and manifest in different disease susceptibilities and treatment responses across sexes. Sex differences in brain have raised a lot of controversy due to small and sometimes contradictory sex-specific effects. Many studies have been published to identify sex-biased genes in one or several brain regions, but the assessment of the robustness of these studies is missing. We therefore collected huge amount of publicly available transcriptomic data to first estimate whether consistent sex differences exist and further explore their likely origin and functional significance.
Results and conclusion
In order to systematically characterise sex-specific differences across human brain regions, we collected transcription profiles for more than 16,000 samples from 46 datasets across 11 brain regions. By systematic integration of the data from multiple studies, we identified robust transcription level differences in human brain across to identify male-biased and female-biased genes in each brain region. Firstly, both male and female-biased genes were highly conserved across primates and showed a high overlap with sex-biased genes in other species. Female-biased genes were enriched for neuron-associated processes while male-biased genes were enriched for membranes and nuclear structures. Male-biased genes were enriched on the Y chromosome while female-biased genes were enriched on the X chromosome, which included X chromosome inactivation escapees explaining the origins of some sex differences. Male-biased genes were enriched for mitotic processes while female-biased genes were enriched for synaptic membrane and lumen. Finally, sex-biased genes were enriched for drug-targets and more female-biased genes were affected by adverse drug reactions than male-biased genes. In summary, by building a comprehensive resource of sex differences across human brain regions at gene expression level, we explored their likely origin and functional significance. We have also developed a web resource to make the entire analysis available for the scientific community for further exploration, available at https://joshiapps.cbu.uib.no/SRB_app/
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Integrated analysis of robust sex-biased gene signatures in human brain
Description:
Abstract
Background
Sexual dimorphism is highly prominent in mammals with many physiological and behavioral differences between male and female form of the species.
Accordingly, the fundamental social and cultural stratification factors for humans is sex.
The sex differences are thought to emerge from a combination of genetic and environmental factors.
It distinguishes individuals most prominently on the reproductive traits, but also affects many of the other related traits and manifest in different disease susceptibilities and treatment responses across sexes.
Sex differences in brain have raised a lot of controversy due to small and sometimes contradictory sex-specific effects.
Many studies have been published to identify sex-biased genes in one or several brain regions, but the assessment of the robustness of these studies is missing.
We therefore collected huge amount of publicly available transcriptomic data to first estimate whether consistent sex differences exist and further explore their likely origin and functional significance.
Results and conclusion
In order to systematically characterise sex-specific differences across human brain regions, we collected transcription profiles for more than 16,000 samples from 46 datasets across 11 brain regions.
By systematic integration of the data from multiple studies, we identified robust transcription level differences in human brain across to identify male-biased and female-biased genes in each brain region.
Firstly, both male and female-biased genes were highly conserved across primates and showed a high overlap with sex-biased genes in other species.
Female-biased genes were enriched for neuron-associated processes while male-biased genes were enriched for membranes and nuclear structures.
Male-biased genes were enriched on the Y chromosome while female-biased genes were enriched on the X chromosome, which included X chromosome inactivation escapees explaining the origins of some sex differences.
Male-biased genes were enriched for mitotic processes while female-biased genes were enriched for synaptic membrane and lumen.
Finally, sex-biased genes were enriched for drug-targets and more female-biased genes were affected by adverse drug reactions than male-biased genes.
In summary, by building a comprehensive resource of sex differences across human brain regions at gene expression level, we explored their likely origin and functional significance.
We have also developed a web resource to make the entire analysis available for the scientific community for further exploration, available at https://joshiapps.
cbu.
uib.
no/SRB_app/.
Related Results
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women
AbstractBackgroundWomen experience adverse drug reactions, ADRs, nearly twice as often as men, yet the role of sex as a biological factor in the generation of ADRs is poorly unders...
Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains
Sex-specific differences in zebrafish brains
AbstractIn this systematic review, we highlight the differences between the male and female zebrafish brains to understand their differentiation and their use in studying sex-speci...
Are Men Who Buy Sex Different from Men Who Do Not?: Exploring Sex Life Characteristics Based on a Randomized Population Survey in Sweden
Are Men Who Buy Sex Different from Men Who Do Not?: Exploring Sex Life Characteristics Based on a Randomized Population Survey in Sweden
AbstractThe buying and selling of sex is a topic of frequent discussion and a relevant public health issue. Studies of sex workers are available, while studies addressing the deman...
Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender
Sex and gender differences in drug treatment: experiences from the knowledge database Janusmed Sex and Gender
Abstract
Background
Evidence from clinical research indicates that men and women can differ in response to drug treatment. The knowledge database Ja...
VIII. Captured in terminology: Sex, sex categories, and sex differences
VIII. Captured in terminology: Sex, sex categories, and sex differences
Swayed by the clear distinction between male and female genitalia, the question of how far these categories extend into human biology has attracted humans for centuries. This quest...
The colored-brain thesis
The colored-brain thesis
The “colored-brain thesis”, or strong qualitative physicalism, is discussed from historical and philosophical perspectives. This thesis was proposed by Thomas Case (1888), in a non...
In search of sex-related mediators of affective illness
In search of sex-related mediators of affective illness
AbstractSex differences in the rates of affective disorders have been recognized for decades. Studies of physiologic sex-related differences in animals and humans, however, have ge...
Plastic fantastic: Sex robots and/as sexual fantasy
Plastic fantastic: Sex robots and/as sexual fantasy
This article provides an interdisciplinary and intersectional analysis of sex robots and/as sexual fantasy. I demonstrate that sexual fantasy is a highly complex and salient vector...