Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The emphasis given to evolution in state science standards: A lever for change in evolution education?
View through CrossRef
AbstractThis study analyzed the science frameworks of 49 states and the District of Colombia to determine the emphasis given to evolution in these documents at the middle and secondary levels. These concepts were species evolve over time, speciation, diversity of life, descent with modification from common ancestry, evidence of evolution, natural selection, pace and direction of evolution, and human evolution. Collectively, the 50 science frameworks emphasized evolution in a manner that suggests that if the public's support for standards‐based curricula is a reality, the study of evolution will be emphasized in an unprecedented manner in the nation's schools in the near future. However, all concepts were not emphasized equally in these documents. For example, human evolution was included in only seven documents. The word evolution is absent from some standards. Despite these negatives, recent actions to improve existing standards or to adopt new standards that emphasize evolution have occurred. The metaphor “lever of change” is often used in the context of school reform. This metaphor suggests a simple system where one change can result in a desired outcome. However, in classrooms where curriculum decisions evolve constantly, multiple factors interact and reinforce one another in response to both internal and external contingencies that emerge. Educational change can not be reduced to a simple linear cause/effect situation. The change process involved is nonlinear where what goes in is not proportional to what comes out because of feedback loops and other factors that complicate results. This nonlinearity is reflected in the varied responses of teachers to specific contingencies. Yet, systems can be changed and nudged towards a structure where desired outcomes will emerge. Judicial rulings indicating that the teaching of evolution cannot be prohibited or equal time for creationism mandated, improved coverage of evolution in secondary school biology textbooks, the negative response of many leaders, scientists, organizations, and editorial writers to the 1999 decision of the Kansas State Board of Education to deemphasize and misrepresent evolution in the state's science standards, and the emphasis given to evolution in the standards reviewed for this study, all coalesce to provide needed support for administrators and teachers who are striving to create science curricula that emphasize evolution in a manner commensurate with its importance in understanding the natural world and our place within it. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 86:445–462, 2002; Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10014
Title: The emphasis given to evolution in state science standards: A lever for change in evolution education?
Description:
AbstractThis study analyzed the science frameworks of 49 states and the District of Colombia to determine the emphasis given to evolution in these documents at the middle and secondary levels.
These concepts were species evolve over time, speciation, diversity of life, descent with modification from common ancestry, evidence of evolution, natural selection, pace and direction of evolution, and human evolution.
Collectively, the 50 science frameworks emphasized evolution in a manner that suggests that if the public's support for standards‐based curricula is a reality, the study of evolution will be emphasized in an unprecedented manner in the nation's schools in the near future.
However, all concepts were not emphasized equally in these documents.
For example, human evolution was included in only seven documents.
The word evolution is absent from some standards.
Despite these negatives, recent actions to improve existing standards or to adopt new standards that emphasize evolution have occurred.
The metaphor “lever of change” is often used in the context of school reform.
This metaphor suggests a simple system where one change can result in a desired outcome.
However, in classrooms where curriculum decisions evolve constantly, multiple factors interact and reinforce one another in response to both internal and external contingencies that emerge.
Educational change can not be reduced to a simple linear cause/effect situation.
The change process involved is nonlinear where what goes in is not proportional to what comes out because of feedback loops and other factors that complicate results.
This nonlinearity is reflected in the varied responses of teachers to specific contingencies.
Yet, systems can be changed and nudged towards a structure where desired outcomes will emerge.
Judicial rulings indicating that the teaching of evolution cannot be prohibited or equal time for creationism mandated, improved coverage of evolution in secondary school biology textbooks, the negative response of many leaders, scientists, organizations, and editorial writers to the 1999 decision of the Kansas State Board of Education to deemphasize and misrepresent evolution in the state's science standards, and the emphasis given to evolution in the standards reviewed for this study, all coalesce to provide needed support for administrators and teachers who are striving to create science curricula that emphasize evolution in a manner commensurate with its importance in understanding the natural world and our place within it.
© 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Sci Ed 86:445–462, 2002; Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.
interscience.
wiley.
com).
DOI 10.
1002/sce.
10014.
Related Results
International Perspectives on Standards and Benchmarking in Teacher Education
International Perspectives on Standards and Benchmarking in Teacher Education
Ensuring quality teachers and quality teacher education programmes have been fundamental global concerns over the decades. High quality teachers are critical to the future developm...
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
Climate Change and Children
Australian children are uniquely situated in a vast landscape that varies drastically across locations. Spanning multiple climatic zones—from cool tempe...
Kinematics of the Lever Arm Swing in Myosin VI
Kinematics of the Lever Arm Swing in Myosin VI
Abstract
Myosin VI (MVI) is the only known member of the myosin superfamily that, upon dimerization, walks processively towards the pointed end of the actin filamen...
Lever arm Flexibility Controls the extent of (Un)coupling to the Motor Domain in Myosin Motors
Lever arm Flexibility Controls the extent of (Un)coupling to the Motor Domain in Myosin Motors
Abstract
Dimeric myosin motors, with both heads simultaneously bound to filamentous actin, are in a frustrated conformation. The lever arm of each head would prefer...
API Offshore Structures Standards: Changing Times
API Offshore Structures Standards: Changing Times
Abstract
Two instrumental series of events in the past several years have provided the impetus for API Subcommittee 2 (SC 2) to action a new strategy for the API ...
Simple muscle-lever systems are not so simple: The need for dynamic analyses to predict lever mechanics that maximize speed
Simple muscle-lever systems are not so simple: The need for dynamic analyses to predict lever mechanics that maximize speed
Abstract
Here we argue that quasi-static analyses are insufficient to predict the speed of an organism from its skeletal mechanics alone (i.e. lever arm mechanics)....
Marine Control Cable Connection—Engine Throttle Lever
Marine Control Cable Connection—Engine Throttle Lever
<div class="section abstract">
<div class="htmlview paragraph">The purpose of this SAE Recommended Practice is to provide guides toward standard conditions for operat...
Synthesis of a ten-link tooth-lever differential roller transmission mechanism
Synthesis of a ten-link tooth-lever differential roller transmission mechanism
This article deals with the synthesis of a ten-link tooth-lever differential transmission mechanism. The article contains an analytical review of modern scientific research on the ...

