Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The shaping ability of WaveOne Gold, TRUShape and XP‐endo Shaper systems in oval‐shaped distal canals of mandibular molars: A microcomputed tomographic analysis

View through CrossRef
AbstractAimTo compare the shaping ability of a heat‐treated centric reciprocating file system (WaveOne Gold), a heat‐treated eccentric rotary multifile system (TRUShape 3D Conforming Files), and a heat‐treated expandable one‐file rotary system (XP‐endo Shaper) extending its activation time, in preparing oval‐shaped root canals in extracted mandibular molars by means of microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT) analysis.MethodologyThirty moderately curved oval‐shaped distal roots of mandibular molars were selected. The normality of canal length, curvature angle, volume, surface area, structure model index, and aspect ratio were confirmed. The samples were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10). Micro‐CT scans were taken before and after canals were instrumented using WaveOne Gold (size 35, .06 taper), or TRUShape (size 30, .06v taper), both following the manufacturer's instructions, or XP‐endo Shaper following a new protocol with extended activation time. The mechanical preparation time for each sample was recorded. Pre‐ and postoperative images were analysed for the percentage of unprepared canal areas and the percentage of removed dentine. Data were compared between groups using the statistical analyses one‐way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < .05).ResultsThe percentage of unprepared canal areas was significantly higher with WaveOne Gold (% 11.5 ± 4.0) and TRUShape (% 12.4 ± 5.8) compared with XP‐endo Shaper (% 5.2 ± 2.6) (p < .05). XP‐endo Shaper removed significantly more dentine (3.3 ± 1.5 mm3) than WaveOne Gold (1.8 ± 0.8 mm3) and TRUShape (1.9 ± 0.8 mm3) (p < .05). No significant differences were seen for mechanical preparation time between WaveOne Gold (79 ± 31 s), TRUShape (104 ± 41 s) and XP‐endo Shaper (71 ± 23 s) (p > .05).ConclusionsThe comparison of three recognized root canal filing systems has shown that with similar preparation times, the XP‐endo Shaper removed more dentine (mm3) leaving less unprepared canal wall area (%) than WaveOne Gold and TRUShape when preparing oval‐shaped root canals of extracted mandibular molars.
Title: The shaping ability of WaveOne Gold, TRUShape and XP‐endo Shaper systems in oval‐shaped distal canals of mandibular molars: A microcomputed tomographic analysis
Description:
AbstractAimTo compare the shaping ability of a heat‐treated centric reciprocating file system (WaveOne Gold), a heat‐treated eccentric rotary multifile system (TRUShape 3D Conforming Files), and a heat‐treated expandable one‐file rotary system (XP‐endo Shaper) extending its activation time, in preparing oval‐shaped root canals in extracted mandibular molars by means of microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT) analysis.
MethodologyThirty moderately curved oval‐shaped distal roots of mandibular molars were selected.
The normality of canal length, curvature angle, volume, surface area, structure model index, and aspect ratio were confirmed.
The samples were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10).
Micro‐CT scans were taken before and after canals were instrumented using WaveOne Gold (size 35, .
06 taper), or TRUShape (size 30, .
06v taper), both following the manufacturer's instructions, or XP‐endo Shaper following a new protocol with extended activation time.
The mechanical preparation time for each sample was recorded.
Pre‐ and postoperative images were analysed for the percentage of unprepared canal areas and the percentage of removed dentine.
Data were compared between groups using the statistical analyses one‐way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < .
05).
ResultsThe percentage of unprepared canal areas was significantly higher with WaveOne Gold (% 11.
5 ± 4.
0) and TRUShape (% 12.
4 ± 5.
8) compared with XP‐endo Shaper (% 5.
2 ± 2.
6) (p < .
05).
XP‐endo Shaper removed significantly more dentine (3.
3 ± 1.
5 mm3) than WaveOne Gold (1.
8 ± 0.
8 mm3) and TRUShape (1.
9 ± 0.
8 mm3) (p < .
05).
No significant differences were seen for mechanical preparation time between WaveOne Gold (79 ± 31 s), TRUShape (104 ± 41 s) and XP‐endo Shaper (71 ± 23 s) (p > .
05).
ConclusionsThe comparison of three recognized root canal filing systems has shown that with similar preparation times, the XP‐endo Shaper removed more dentine (mm3) leaving less unprepared canal wall area (%) than WaveOne Gold and TRUShape when preparing oval‐shaped root canals of extracted mandibular molars.

Related Results

Avaliação do preparo de canais mesiais curvos por diferentes sistemas de instrumento único: estudo por microtomografia computadorizada
Avaliação do preparo de canais mesiais curvos por diferentes sistemas de instrumento único: estudo por microtomografia computadorizada
Este estudo, por meio de microtomografia computadorizada, avaliou a eficácia de três diferentes instrumentos endodônticos de uso único, quanto ao preparo de canais mesiais curvos d...
In vitro study of the morphology of internal lower second molars
In vitro study of the morphology of internal lower second molars
The mandibular molars are a group of teeth that have a complex internal morphology, and its fundamental knowledge is necessary. The second molar has two roots, one mesial and dista...
Centering ability of waveone gold and protaper next rotary file systems in stimulated resin root canals
Centering ability of waveone gold and protaper next rotary file systems in stimulated resin root canals
Background: The combination of NiTi alloy with rotary instrument is a turning point in clinical endodontics that helps to keep the original shape of the canal, reduce the errors su...
Differences in the confluence of mesial canals in mandibular molar teeth with three or four root canals
Differences in the confluence of mesial canals in mandibular molar teeth with three or four root canals
AbstractAim  To investigate the correlation between number of root canals and their confluence in mandibular molar teeth.Methodology  A total of 553 first and 383 second mandibular...
Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the root canal morphology of primary molars
Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the root canal morphology of primary molars
Abstract Background: This study aimed to assess the root canal morphology of primary molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: This cross-sectional study ...
Prevalence of C-shaped canal morphology of first and second mandibular molars using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Prevalence of C-shaped canal morphology of first and second mandibular molars using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Introduction: Due to the importance of familiarity with root canal morphology in order to completely clear the canal and achieve treatment success, the aim of this study was to use...
Evaluation of endo-perio lesions according to different specific classifications
Evaluation of endo-perio lesions according to different specific classifications
Abstract Introduction: Endo-perio lesions, beyond the clinical examination, are also assessed by means of radiographs. It is important that the radiographs used for diagnos...
Impact of mandibular third molars on angle fractures: A retrospective study
Impact of mandibular third molars on angle fractures: A retrospective study
AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies have shown that the position and presence of mandibular third molars is associated with a high risk of mandibular angle fractures. The aim of thi...

Back to Top