Javascript must be enabled to continue!
“The Narod in the Historiography and History of Ivan IV’s Reign”
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Historians investigating the reign of Ivan IV frequently employ the word narod (“people”) in their exposition. Indeed that word does occur in sources about Ivan IV’s reign. However, no one has ever compared the meaning projected onto that term by historians to the meaning it had during the sixteenth century. While it is true that both the historiographic and historical narod can be used inclusively, for all Muscovites, or exclusively, to denote a segment of the population on social, geographic, or simply coincidental criteria, there is a major distinction between its inclusive meaning in historiography versus history. In the historiography the narod sometimes thinks and acts collectively, whereas in the history the narod does neither. The historiographic narod exercises a group agency which the historical narod conspicuously lacks. It would behoove historians referring to the narod during Ivan IV’s reign to acknowledge this disparity between “the People” and “people.”
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: “The Narod in the Historiography and History of Ivan IV’s Reign”
Description:
Abstract
Historians investigating the reign of Ivan IV frequently employ the word narod (“people”) in their exposition.
Indeed that word does occur in sources about Ivan IV’s reign.
However, no one has ever compared the meaning projected onto that term by historians to the meaning it had during the sixteenth century.
While it is true that both the historiographic and historical narod can be used inclusively, for all Muscovites, or exclusively, to denote a segment of the population on social, geographic, or simply coincidental criteria, there is a major distinction between its inclusive meaning in historiography versus history.
In the historiography the narod sometimes thinks and acts collectively, whereas in the history the narod does neither.
The historiographic narod exercises a group agency which the historical narod conspicuously lacks.
It would behoove historians referring to the narod during Ivan IV’s reign to acknowledge this disparity between “the People” and “people.
”.
Related Results
Ivan IV the Terrible, Tsar of Russia
Ivan IV the Terrible, Tsar of Russia
Ivan IV (Ivan Vasil’evich, Ivan the Terrible, Ivan Groznyi [the Awe-Inspiring]) was born in 1530 and ruled from 1533 to 1547 as Grand Prince of Moscow and All Russia and from 1547 ...
Perkembangan Historiografi Indonesia
Perkembangan Historiografi Indonesia
The development of historiography in Indonesia cannot be separated from the historical background of the Indonesian nation. In the development of historical writing in Indonesia, s...
Historiography of European Art
Historiography of European Art
The visual arts and architecture have been discussed in Europe since classical Antiquity. While several earlier Greek authors are known to have written on these subjects, the first...
Kontribusi Badri Yatim dalam Historiografi Islam
Kontribusi Badri Yatim dalam Historiografi Islam
History is past responsibility. In essence history cannot be separated from human life as the most perfect living creature in form and behavior. Writing history is an attempt to re...
Reign Symbols as a Source on Chinese History (Part 1)
Reign Symbols as a Source on Chinese History (Part 1)
This paper focuses on exploring the symbolical side of the Chinas emperors reign names as the highest sacral generalizations. Reign symbol is pair of characters, which defines a re...
Features of Ivan Ohiienko's language style
Features of Ivan Ohiienko's language style
The article analyzes the peculiarities of the language style of the outstanding Ukrainian scientist, Professor Ivan Ohiienko. Ivan Ohiienko is known to have made a great contributi...
Ivan the Terrible as a problem of Russian Philosophy of History
Ivan the Terrible as a problem of Russian Philosophy of History
The purpose of the article is to consider the historiosophical ideas about the personality of Ivan IV the Terrible and his role in the history of the Russian state. To achieve this...
Ivan the Terrible in Russian Historiography
Ivan the Terrible in Russian Historiography
Russian historians have taken a livelier interest in Ivan the Terrible than in any other Tsar except Peter the Great. But they have always been seriously handicapped in their treat...

