Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Charcoal Production Systems from Smallholder Plantation implications on Carbon Emission and Sustainable Livelihood Benefits in North Western Ethiopia

View through CrossRef
Abstract Charcoal production from Eucalyptus camaldulensis small-scale plantations has considerable socioeconomic benefits and improves livelihoods in Ethiopia. Nonetheless, charcoal is produced using traditional earth mound kilns, resulting in poor efficiency, lower charcoal income, and pollution of the environment. This research evaluates the charcoal conversion efficiency, cost-benefit analysis, and emission of gases from improved charcoal-making kilns from Eucalyptus camaldulensis small-scale plantations compared to traditional earth mound kilns. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with a level of significance of t 0.05. The result of the study shows significant (P < 0.001) variation in charcoal conversion efficiency among the different tested kilns, with the order of green mad retort kiln (33.7%) > Casamance kiln (32.09%) > MRV steel kiln (28.25%) > traditional earth mound kilns (23.55%). Improved charcoal-making kilns increased the efficiency of wood-to-charcoal conversion by 20–43% compared to the traditional earth mound kilns. The financial profitability analysis revealed that Casamance improved kilns generate the highest equivalent annual charcoal income (117126.9 ETB year-1) followed by Green Mad Retort (82893.8 ETB year-1) and MRV steel kilns (58495.9 ETB year-1) respectively. As was expected, the lowest net present value was found from traditional earth mound kilns (47304.3 ETB year-1). The carbonization time of traditional earth mound kilns was significantly (P < 0.001) the longest, with 3.6 times in the Mark V kiln and 2 times in the Casamance kiln. Furthermore, statistical analysis shows that improved charcoal-making technology reduces the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) by 36.1–50.7%, carbon monoxide (CO) by 39.2–54.3%, and methane (CH4) by 29.6–47%. In general, a shift from traditional to cleaner, renewable, and environmentally friendly charcoal kilns is needed.
Title: Charcoal Production Systems from Smallholder Plantation implications on Carbon Emission and Sustainable Livelihood Benefits in North Western Ethiopia
Description:
Abstract Charcoal production from Eucalyptus camaldulensis small-scale plantations has considerable socioeconomic benefits and improves livelihoods in Ethiopia.
Nonetheless, charcoal is produced using traditional earth mound kilns, resulting in poor efficiency, lower charcoal income, and pollution of the environment.
This research evaluates the charcoal conversion efficiency, cost-benefit analysis, and emission of gases from improved charcoal-making kilns from Eucalyptus camaldulensis small-scale plantations compared to traditional earth mound kilns.
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with a level of significance of t 0.
05.
The result of the study shows significant (P < 0.
001) variation in charcoal conversion efficiency among the different tested kilns, with the order of green mad retort kiln (33.
7%) > Casamance kiln (32.
09%) > MRV steel kiln (28.
25%) > traditional earth mound kilns (23.
55%).
Improved charcoal-making kilns increased the efficiency of wood-to-charcoal conversion by 20–43% compared to the traditional earth mound kilns.
The financial profitability analysis revealed that Casamance improved kilns generate the highest equivalent annual charcoal income (117126.
9 ETB year-1) followed by Green Mad Retort (82893.
8 ETB year-1) and MRV steel kilns (58495.
9 ETB year-1) respectively.
As was expected, the lowest net present value was found from traditional earth mound kilns (47304.
3 ETB year-1).
The carbonization time of traditional earth mound kilns was significantly (P < 0.
001) the longest, with 3.
6 times in the Mark V kiln and 2 times in the Casamance kiln.
Furthermore, statistical analysis shows that improved charcoal-making technology reduces the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) by 36.
1–50.
7%, carbon monoxide (CO) by 39.
2–54.
3%, and methane (CH4) by 29.
6–47%.
In general, a shift from traditional to cleaner, renewable, and environmentally friendly charcoal kilns is needed.

Related Results

Effects of charcoal production on carbon cycling in African tropical forests
Effects of charcoal production on carbon cycling in African tropical forests
&lt;p&gt;The increasing demand for charcoal in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is a growing threat to tropical ecosystems as more forest areas get cleared to meet the high energy ...
How Livelihood Assets Contribute to Sustainable Development of Smallholder Farmers
How Livelihood Assets Contribute to Sustainable Development of Smallholder Farmers
AbstractThere is a knowledge gap and practical demand to understand the relationship between capitals for developing sustainable livelihoods to realize poverty reduction and sustai...
Zero to hero
Zero to hero
Western images of Japan tell a seemingly incongruous story of love, sex and marriage – one full of contradictions and conflicting moral codes. We sometimes hear intriguing stories ...
Understanding Variability in Carbon Foot Prints of Smallholder Dairy Farm, in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia.
Understanding Variability in Carbon Foot Prints of Smallholder Dairy Farm, in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia.
Abstract Smallholder dairy farms face enormous challenges of increasing milk production while also mitigating associated GHG emission, thereby increasing climate resilience...
Analysis of Maize Commercialization among Smallholder Farmers: Empirical Evidence from North Western Ethiopia
Analysis of Maize Commercialization among Smallholder Farmers: Empirical Evidence from North Western Ethiopia
Abstract Agricultural commercialization is a process of transformation from subsistence farming system to market oriented production system. Promoting smallholder farmers t...
Comparing Timber and Lumber from Plantation and Natural Stands of Ponderosa Pine
Comparing Timber and Lumber from Plantation and Natural Stands of Ponderosa Pine
Abstract Data derived from empirical studies, coupled with modeling and simulation techniques, were used to compare tree and product quality from two stands of small...

Back to Top