Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Publication Count of Matched Dermatology Applicants Reported in Literature: A Systematic Review

View through CrossRef
Abstract BACKGROUND Competitive medical residency specialties, such as Dermatology, have historically placed lofty demands on applicants. We focus on the ever-increasing demands on applicants to publish, as well as discuss and quantify the delivery of these expectations in literature. OBJECTIVE To systematically review evidence regarding the number of publications possessed by successful applicants to a dermatology residency program. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was conducted between April and May 2023. PubMed, Google Scholar, and OVID were with no lower limit of the year. Our summary included 41 publications that specifically cited the number of publications by NRMP applicants successfully matching to US dermatology programs. We extracted additional applicant details (demographics, publication type) as available. RESULTS We found two major categories of cumulative publications reported in the literature: NRMP scholarly works and peer-reviewed indexed publications. Summarizing reports from 21 papers between 2011 and 2022, NRMP showed the overall mean amongst matched applicants to be 14.77 publications, with an upward trend over time. Throughout the literature, the mean was 3.23 peer-reviewed indexed publications for successful dermatology applicants. CONCLUSION Multiple studies cited and reported NRMP scholarly work numbers as “publications'', potentially contributing to discrepancies in the literature. NRMP encompasses other research endeavors in addition to peer-reviewed indexed publications in publication count. In the future, there should be greater clarification when defining and quantifying the publications of a successful dermatology applicant.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Publication Count of Matched Dermatology Applicants Reported in Literature: A Systematic Review
Description:
Abstract BACKGROUND Competitive medical residency specialties, such as Dermatology, have historically placed lofty demands on applicants.
We focus on the ever-increasing demands on applicants to publish, as well as discuss and quantify the delivery of these expectations in literature.
OBJECTIVE To systematically review evidence regarding the number of publications possessed by successful applicants to a dermatology residency program.
METHODS A systematic review of the literature was conducted between April and May 2023.
PubMed, Google Scholar, and OVID were with no lower limit of the year.
Our summary included 41 publications that specifically cited the number of publications by NRMP applicants successfully matching to US dermatology programs.
We extracted additional applicant details (demographics, publication type) as available.
RESULTS We found two major categories of cumulative publications reported in the literature: NRMP scholarly works and peer-reviewed indexed publications.
Summarizing reports from 21 papers between 2011 and 2022, NRMP showed the overall mean amongst matched applicants to be 14.
77 publications, with an upward trend over time.
Throughout the literature, the mean was 3.
23 peer-reviewed indexed publications for successful dermatology applicants.
CONCLUSION Multiple studies cited and reported NRMP scholarly work numbers as “publications'', potentially contributing to discrepancies in the literature.
NRMP encompasses other research endeavors in addition to peer-reviewed indexed publications in publication count.
In the future, there should be greater clarification when defining and quantifying the publications of a successful dermatology applicant.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Increasing lengths of rank order lists of applicants and programs of US medical residencies
Increasing lengths of rank order lists of applicants and programs of US medical residencies
Background To match medical students into residency training programs, both the program and student create rank order lists (ROLs). We aim to investigate temporal trends in ROL len...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Poster 154: Top Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Programs as Perceived by Applicants
Poster 154: Top Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Programs as Perceived by Applicants
Objectives: Despite the high volume of orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship applicants and growing interest in the field, fellowship applicants’ attitudes and preferences towards...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Assessment of publication time in Campbell Systematic Reviews: A cross‐sectional survey
Assessment of publication time in Campbell Systematic Reviews: A cross‐sectional survey
AbstractDelayed publication of systematic reviews increases the risk of presenting outdated data. To date, no studies have examined the time and review process from title registrat...

Back to Top