Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Temporary Replacement of Production Facilities by a Dynamic Positioned FPSO
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This paper describes the successful modification and mobilization of the FPSO Munin to the West River Field, offshore China, to allow continued Field production while the incumbent FPSO is removed for essential dry docking and maintenance.
This paper lists the specific characteristics of the Munin and details the required studies and modifications that were required to achieve a production target of 80,000 BOPD whilst operating in a Dynamic Positioning System mode.
These goals were achieved within 12 months of contract award in an area known for its challenging environmental conditions. This has clearly demonstrated the flexibility and advantages of the Munin FPSO and that such a vessel could be of major interest for other offshore development scenarios.
Introduction
In October 2004, the original FPSO (the NHKT) was due in dry dock for its 5-year class survey and extensive maintenance activities, scheduled to last 160 up to 190 days. To prevent a production shutdown of approximately half a year the field operator searched the market for temporary production facilities capable to replace the FPSO. The main criteria for the replacement facilities were:Easy connection possibilities to the existing mooring system in order to minimize installation time and associated "non-production" time.A disconnectable mooring system, due to the fact that the area is frequently visited by severe typhoons.A production capacity of approximately 70,000 barrels oil per day (BOPD).Sufficient storage capacity and reliable offloading arrangement to guarantee uninterrupted production. When the field operator started to investigate the market for the replacement facilities, Bluewater was operating the Munin FPSO at the Lufeng Field, located in the South China Sea and licensed to Statoil Orient Inc (SOI). Contractually the Munin FPSO was obliged to remain on the Lufeng Field till February 15 2004. Bluewater offered the Munin FPSO to the field operator as temporary replacement for the NHKT on the West River Field on contract completion. Assuming production shutdown at February 15 Bluewater would have 7.5 months to modify the Munin FPSO and make it suitable for the West River Field. However, due to the high oil price and the higher than expected production on Lufeng, SOI and Bluewater agreed to keep the Munin FPSO as long as possible on the Lufeng Field.
In order to maximize production time, the Bluewater project team was challenged to minimize the yard modification period of the Munin FPSO. Initially a yard period of three weeks was planned, in which all modifications required for production on West River Field would have to be completed.
Studies carried out by SOI indicated un-recovered reserves on the Lufeng Field and the potential for field extensions. These events drew SOI and Bluewater together and Bluewater managed to secure a follow-up contract on the Lufeng Field after completing their obligations on the West River Field. This contract would secure several more years of production for the Munin FPSO on the Lufeng Field.
Title: Temporary Replacement of Production Facilities by a Dynamic Positioned FPSO
Description:
Abstract
This paper describes the successful modification and mobilization of the FPSO Munin to the West River Field, offshore China, to allow continued Field production while the incumbent FPSO is removed for essential dry docking and maintenance.
This paper lists the specific characteristics of the Munin and details the required studies and modifications that were required to achieve a production target of 80,000 BOPD whilst operating in a Dynamic Positioning System mode.
These goals were achieved within 12 months of contract award in an area known for its challenging environmental conditions.
This has clearly demonstrated the flexibility and advantages of the Munin FPSO and that such a vessel could be of major interest for other offshore development scenarios.
Introduction
In October 2004, the original FPSO (the NHKT) was due in dry dock for its 5-year class survey and extensive maintenance activities, scheduled to last 160 up to 190 days.
To prevent a production shutdown of approximately half a year the field operator searched the market for temporary production facilities capable to replace the FPSO.
The main criteria for the replacement facilities were:Easy connection possibilities to the existing mooring system in order to minimize installation time and associated "non-production" time.
A disconnectable mooring system, due to the fact that the area is frequently visited by severe typhoons.
A production capacity of approximately 70,000 barrels oil per day (BOPD).
Sufficient storage capacity and reliable offloading arrangement to guarantee uninterrupted production.
When the field operator started to investigate the market for the replacement facilities, Bluewater was operating the Munin FPSO at the Lufeng Field, located in the South China Sea and licensed to Statoil Orient Inc (SOI).
Contractually the Munin FPSO was obliged to remain on the Lufeng Field till February 15 2004.
Bluewater offered the Munin FPSO to the field operator as temporary replacement for the NHKT on the West River Field on contract completion.
Assuming production shutdown at February 15 Bluewater would have 7.
5 months to modify the Munin FPSO and make it suitable for the West River Field.
However, due to the high oil price and the higher than expected production on Lufeng, SOI and Bluewater agreed to keep the Munin FPSO as long as possible on the Lufeng Field.
In order to maximize production time, the Bluewater project team was challenged to minimize the yard modification period of the Munin FPSO.
Initially a yard period of three weeks was planned, in which all modifications required for production on West River Field would have to be completed.
Studies carried out by SOI indicated un-recovered reserves on the Lufeng Field and the potential for field extensions.
These events drew SOI and Bluewater together and Bluewater managed to secure a follow-up contract on the Lufeng Field after completing their obligations on the West River Field.
This contract would secure several more years of production for the Munin FPSO on the Lufeng Field.
Related Results
Competitive CVAR-FPSO concepts with Dry trees in ultra-deepwater; Weathervaning CVAR-FPSO for Brazil and Indonesia vs. Non-weathervaning for West Africa
Competitive CVAR-FPSO concepts with Dry trees in ultra-deepwater; Weathervaning CVAR-FPSO for Brazil and Indonesia vs. Non-weathervaning for West Africa
Abstract
A new FPSO concept termed CVAR-FPSO is under development by a JNOC headed Joint Industry Project (JIP). The concept, using Compliant Vertical Access Rise...
FPSO EIS Results and Record of Decision
FPSO EIS Results and Record of Decision
Abstract
The United States Department of the Interior (DOI), Minerals Management Service (MMS) prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS)1 to evaluate poten...
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
ABSTRACT
FPSO technology over the past years has rapidly evolved from tanker based units with classical mooring systems to purpose-shaped new built vessels equipp...
The Challenges and Opportunities of FPSO Relocations
The Challenges and Opportunities of FPSO Relocations
Abstract
The first FPSO relocation project was completed 18 years ago (SBM's FPSO II), and since that time there has been a steady rise in the number and complexi...
The Sanha LPG FPSO
The Sanha LPG FPSO
Abstract
The FPSO industry will soon have the first LPG FPSO in operation. The SANHA LPG FPSO is the first gas related FPSO. With the installation of the LPG FPSO...
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
Potable Water Sources, Household Hygiene, and Sanitation Practices in Ikpoba Okha LGA, Edo State: Implications for Public Health and Sustainable Water Management
Omoregie, Andrew Edosa.1 Omoregie Abieyuwa Peace2 Okoro, Enyinnaya Okoro.3
1 College of Medi
BACKGROUND
Access to potable drinking water and sufficient sanitation continues to be an urgent global concern, particularly in developing regions where con...
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading Systems in the Gulf of Mexico OCS: A Regulatory Perspective
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading Systems in the Gulf of Mexico OCS: A Regulatory Perspective
Abstract
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) systems represent an untested technology in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Outer Continental Shelf. Th...
ROSA: New Challenges in West Africa Deepwater Developments
ROSA: New Challenges in West Africa Deepwater Developments
Abstract
Discovered in 1998, the Rosa field is located offshore Angola in the prolific Block 17, at a distance of 16 kilometers from the spread-moored Girassol FP...

