Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS AND MEDICAL OFFICERS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

View through CrossRef
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, including the field of rehabilitation, where it supports clinical decision-making, enhances diagnostic precision, and automates therapeutic processes. As AI technologies such as machine learning and robotics gain traction in medical settings, understanding the perceptions and readiness of healthcare professionals is crucial. This study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes of physical therapists (PTs) and medical officers (MOs) toward the integration of AI into rehabilitation practice. Objective: To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and readiness of physical therapists and medical officers toward artificial intelligence in rehabilitation, and to determine their willingness to adopt AI technologies in clinical practice. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered, web-based survey distributed via Google Forms. A total of 308 participants, including licensed physical therapists and medical officers across various clinical and academic settings, were recruited through convenience sampling. The survey consisted of 20 structured questions covering demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and ethical considerations regarding AI. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with descriptive and inferential statistics applied to assess associations between variables. Results: The mean age of participants was 30.04 ± 4.77 years (range: 23–47). Of the 308 respondents, 176 (57.1%) were female and 132 (42.9%) were male. A majority, 215 (69.9%), reported moderate knowledge of AI, while 32 (10.4%) indicated no awareness. Participants with less than 10 years of experience (193; 62.7%) were significantly more inclined to believe AI would impact their clinical roles. Moreover, 145 (47.1%) strongly supported integrating AI into medical practice, and 221 (71.9%) favored including AI education in curricula. Conclusion: The study reveals a generally positive attitude and moderate knowledge about AI among physical therapists and medical officers. These findings highlight the need to enhance AI education and training, particularly for experienced practitioners and those in academic roles, to facilitate the effective integration of AI into rehabilitation practice.
Title: KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS AND MEDICAL OFFICERS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTH CARE AND REHABILITATION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Description:
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, including the field of rehabilitation, where it supports clinical decision-making, enhances diagnostic precision, and automates therapeutic processes.
As AI technologies such as machine learning and robotics gain traction in medical settings, understanding the perceptions and readiness of healthcare professionals is crucial.
This study aims to assess the knowledge and attitudes of physical therapists (PTs) and medical officers (MOs) toward the integration of AI into rehabilitation practice.
Objective: To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and readiness of physical therapists and medical officers toward artificial intelligence in rehabilitation, and to determine their willingness to adopt AI technologies in clinical practice.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered, web-based survey distributed via Google Forms.
A total of 308 participants, including licensed physical therapists and medical officers across various clinical and academic settings, were recruited through convenience sampling.
The survey consisted of 20 structured questions covering demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and ethical considerations regarding AI.
Data were analyzed using SPSS, with descriptive and inferential statistics applied to assess associations between variables.
Results: The mean age of participants was 30.
04 ± 4.
77 years (range: 23–47).
Of the 308 respondents, 176 (57.
1%) were female and 132 (42.
9%) were male.
A majority, 215 (69.
9%), reported moderate knowledge of AI, while 32 (10.
4%) indicated no awareness.
Participants with less than 10 years of experience (193; 62.
7%) were significantly more inclined to believe AI would impact their clinical roles.
Moreover, 145 (47.
1%) strongly supported integrating AI into medical practice, and 221 (71.
9%) favored including AI education in curricula.
Conclusion: The study reveals a generally positive attitude and moderate knowledge about AI among physical therapists and medical officers.
These findings highlight the need to enhance AI education and training, particularly for experienced practitioners and those in academic roles, to facilitate the effective integration of AI into rehabilitation practice.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash ABSTRACT Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Attitudes of speech and language therapists towards stammering: 1985 and 2000
Attitudes of speech and language therapists towards stammering: 1985 and 2000
AbstractBackground: Past research has indicated that speech and language therapists hold some negative attitudes towards people who stammer, their parents and the treatment of stam...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
Photo by Hédi Benyounes on Unsplash ABSTRACT The current incarceration facilities for the growing number of women are depriving expecting mothers of adequate care cruci...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

Back to Top